Loading…
How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context
Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03 |
container_end_page | 142 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Fasse, Léonor Sultan, Serge Flahault, Cécile MacKinnon, Christopher J. Dolbeault, Sylvie Brédart, Anne |
description | Background
Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context.
Methods
Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’.
Results
Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following:
Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief.
Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions.
A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context.
Conclusions
Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pon.3412 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04595686v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1523398782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v0zAchiMEYmMg8QmQJS5wyPCfOI5PqFRsRaq2HYZ6tBznZ5qRxMVO2uWj7NviqKWISUg72bIfP_ZrvUnyluBzgjH9tHHdOcsIfZacEixlSnJCnk9zLlJJM3mSvArhDuMIy_xlckIzQngm5WnysHA7VDnkIYD2Zg0-IOM6A_UWkLMobNwQdIN--Bos0rYHj4yO-_4zmqEwhh5a3dcmCrY17KYjraugCWgIUKFy_MfcOxT6oRofaesO9Ws4eKfre7jvXycvrG4CvDmMZ8n3i6-380W6vL78Np8tU5MVgqbMVsAFp5jFsLLEhOJCSFrQqijLkggAbAssTFnGfWItNZZxy3LLjMykwews-bj3rnWjNr5utR-V07VazJZqWsMZlzwv8i2J7Ic9u_Hu1wChV20dDDSN7iAGUoRTxmQhCvoUFDMan_wEayaxEDTnRUTfP0Lv3OC7-D8TRYSMUcVfofEuBA_2mItgNRVGxcKoqTARfXcQDmUL1RH805AIpHtgVzcw_lekbq6vDsIDX8dq3B957X-qXDDB1erqUvHb5Wq1nH9RN-w3qATYIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491798077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context.
Methods
Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’.
Results
Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following:
Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief.
Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions.
A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context.
Conclusions
Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.3412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24115499</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Bereavement ; Cancer ; Carers ; Evidence based research ; Grief ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; literature review ; Models, Psychological ; Neoplasms ; Oncology ; Personal relationships ; Psychology ; spousal loss ; Spouses ; Spouses - psychology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Feb 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24115499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04595686$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flahault, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Background
Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context.
Methods
Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’.
Results
Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following:
Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief.
Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions.
A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context.
Conclusions
Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>literature review</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>spousal loss</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Spouses - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v0zAchiMEYmMg8QmQJS5wyPCfOI5PqFRsRaq2HYZ6tBznZ5qRxMVO2uWj7NviqKWISUg72bIfP_ZrvUnyluBzgjH9tHHdOcsIfZacEixlSnJCnk9zLlJJM3mSvArhDuMIy_xlckIzQngm5WnysHA7VDnkIYD2Zg0-IOM6A_UWkLMobNwQdIN--Bos0rYHj4yO-_4zmqEwhh5a3dcmCrY17KYjraugCWgIUKFy_MfcOxT6oRofaesO9Ws4eKfre7jvXycvrG4CvDmMZ8n3i6-380W6vL78Np8tU5MVgqbMVsAFp5jFsLLEhOJCSFrQqijLkggAbAssTFnGfWItNZZxy3LLjMykwews-bj3rnWjNr5utR-V07VazJZqWsMZlzwv8i2J7Ic9u_Hu1wChV20dDDSN7iAGUoRTxmQhCvoUFDMan_wEayaxEDTnRUTfP0Lv3OC7-D8TRYSMUcVfofEuBA_2mItgNRVGxcKoqTARfXcQDmUL1RH805AIpHtgVzcw_lekbq6vDsIDX8dq3B957X-qXDDB1erqUvHb5Wq1nH9RN-w3qATYIQ</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Fasse, Léonor</creator><creator>Sultan, Serge</creator><creator>Flahault, Cécile</creator><creator>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creator><creator>Brédart, Anne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><author>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>literature review</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>spousal loss</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Spouses - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flahault, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fasse, Léonor</au><au>Sultan, Serge</au><au>Flahault, Cécile</au><au>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</au><au>Dolbeault, Sylvie</au><au>Brédart, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>131-142</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Background
Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context.
Methods
Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’.
Results
Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following:
Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief.
Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions.
A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context.
Conclusions
Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24115499</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.3412</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9249 |
ispartof | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142 |
issn | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04595686v1 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Bereavement Cancer Carers Evidence based research Grief Humanities and Social Sciences Humans literature review Models, Psychological Neoplasms Oncology Personal relationships Psychology spousal loss Spouses Spouses - psychology Systematic review |
title | How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20researchers%20conceive%20of%20spousal%20grief%20after%20cancer?%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20models%20used%20by%20researchers%20to%20study%20spousal%20grief%20in%20the%20cancer%20context&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Fasse,%20L%C3%A9onor&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=131-142&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.3412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1523398782%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491798077&rft_id=info:pmid/24115499&rfr_iscdi=true |