Loading…

How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context

Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142
Main Authors: Fasse, Léonor, Sultan, Serge, Flahault, Cécile, MacKinnon, Christopher J., Dolbeault, Sylvie, Brédart, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 23
creator Fasse, Léonor
Sultan, Serge
Flahault, Cécile
MacKinnon, Christopher J.
Dolbeault, Sylvie
Brédart, Anne
description Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’. Results Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following: Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief. Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions. A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context. Conclusions Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.3412
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04595686v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1523398782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v0zAchiMEYmMg8QmQJS5wyPCfOI5PqFRsRaq2HYZ6tBznZ5qRxMVO2uWj7NviqKWISUg72bIfP_ZrvUnyluBzgjH9tHHdOcsIfZacEixlSnJCnk9zLlJJM3mSvArhDuMIy_xlckIzQngm5WnysHA7VDnkIYD2Zg0-IOM6A_UWkLMobNwQdIN--Bos0rYHj4yO-_4zmqEwhh5a3dcmCrY17KYjraugCWgIUKFy_MfcOxT6oRofaesO9Ws4eKfre7jvXycvrG4CvDmMZ8n3i6-380W6vL78Np8tU5MVgqbMVsAFp5jFsLLEhOJCSFrQqijLkggAbAssTFnGfWItNZZxy3LLjMykwews-bj3rnWjNr5utR-V07VazJZqWsMZlzwv8i2J7Ic9u_Hu1wChV20dDDSN7iAGUoRTxmQhCvoUFDMan_wEayaxEDTnRUTfP0Lv3OC7-D8TRYSMUcVfofEuBA_2mItgNRVGxcKoqTARfXcQDmUL1RH805AIpHtgVzcw_lekbq6vDsIDX8dq3B957X-qXDDB1erqUvHb5Wq1nH9RN-w3qATYIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491798077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’. Results Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following: Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief. Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions. A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context. Conclusions Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.3412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24115499</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Bereavement ; Cancer ; Carers ; Evidence based research ; Grief ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; literature review ; Models, Psychological ; Neoplasms ; Oncology ; Personal relationships ; Psychology ; spousal loss ; Spouses ; Spouses - psychology ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Feb 2014</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,30980,30981</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24115499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04595686$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flahault, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’. Results Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following: Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief. Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions. A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context. Conclusions Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>literature review</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>spousal loss</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Spouses - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v0zAchiMEYmMg8QmQJS5wyPCfOI5PqFRsRaq2HYZ6tBznZ5qRxMVO2uWj7NviqKWISUg72bIfP_ZrvUnyluBzgjH9tHHdOcsIfZacEixlSnJCnk9zLlJJM3mSvArhDuMIy_xlckIzQngm5WnysHA7VDnkIYD2Zg0-IOM6A_UWkLMobNwQdIN--Bos0rYHj4yO-_4zmqEwhh5a3dcmCrY17KYjraugCWgIUKFy_MfcOxT6oRofaesO9Ws4eKfre7jvXycvrG4CvDmMZ8n3i6-380W6vL78Np8tU5MVgqbMVsAFp5jFsLLEhOJCSFrQqijLkggAbAssTFnGfWItNZZxy3LLjMykwews-bj3rnWjNr5utR-V07VazJZqWsMZlzwv8i2J7Ic9u_Hu1wChV20dDDSN7iAGUoRTxmQhCvoUFDMan_wEayaxEDTnRUTfP0Lv3OC7-D8TRYSMUcVfofEuBA_2mItgNRVGxcKoqTARfXcQDmUL1RH805AIpHtgVzcw_lekbq6vDsIDX8dq3B957X-qXDDB1erqUvHb5Wq1nH9RN-w3qATYIQ</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Fasse, Léonor</creator><creator>Sultan, Serge</creator><creator>Flahault, Cécile</creator><creator>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creator><creator>Brédart, Anne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</title><author>Fasse, Léonor ; Sultan, Serge ; Flahault, Cécile ; MacKinnon, Christopher J. ; Dolbeault, Sylvie ; Brédart, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>literature review</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>spousal loss</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Spouses - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fasse, Léonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultan, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flahault, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolbeault, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brédart, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fasse, Léonor</au><au>Sultan, Serge</au><au>Flahault, Cécile</au><au>MacKinnon, Christopher J.</au><au>Dolbeault, Sylvie</au><au>Brédart, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>131-142</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Background Although spouses bereaved after cancer are considered vulnerable people, there have been few empirical studies to explore grief specifically in this context. Methods Using PsycINFO, Medline, and the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched the literature by intersecting ‘cancer’ and ‘grie*’, ‘cancer’ and ‘bereave*’, and ‘cancer’ and ‘mourn*’. Results Gathering 76 studies (2000–2013) that met the inclusion criteria for bereavement in adulthood, bereavement of an adult loved one and evidence‐based research, we found the following: Spousal relationships are not systematically examined in the current dominant models of grief. Theoretically derived determinants of spousal grief after cancer and empirically derived ones converge toward the necessity to include the caregiving experience as determining grief reactions. A growing body of literature concerning prolonged grief disorders now provides integrative reflections regarding the characteristics of spousal loss, predictors, and associated therapeutic interventions in the cancer context. Conclusions Few empirical studies (20 of 76) target spousal bereavement specifically after cancer. The process of adaptation to loss is usually decontextualized, removing any consideration of the relationship to the deceased or the experience of caregiving and dying. Our findings suggest that this topic warrants more studies that use both prospective and mixed methodologies, as well as explore typical grief needs and experiences of bereaved spouses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24115499</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.3412</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2014-02, Vol.23 (2), p.131-142
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04595686v1
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Bereavement
Cancer
Carers
Evidence based research
Grief
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
literature review
Models, Psychological
Neoplasms
Oncology
Personal relationships
Psychology
spousal loss
Spouses
Spouses - psychology
Systematic review
title How do researchers conceive of spousal grief after cancer? A systematic review of models used by researchers to study spousal grief in the cancer context
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20researchers%20conceive%20of%20spousal%20grief%20after%20cancer?%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20models%20used%20by%20researchers%20to%20study%20spousal%20grief%20in%20the%20cancer%20context&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Fasse,%20L%C3%A9onor&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=131-142&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.3412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1523398782%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4872-3fde5752030579b0120879282d8bbb17ee0f807cbb0571ff2cf35f36f3c949c03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491798077&rft_id=info:pmid/24115499&rfr_iscdi=true