Impact of susceptible wheat cultivars on epidemiological parameters involved in the introduction and spread of wheat dwarf disease

• Published in: Plant pathology 2024-09, Vol.73 (7), p.1912-1921
• Main Authors: Armand, Thomas, Souquet, Marlène, Pichon, Elodie, Jacquot, Emmanuel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cereals; Control methods; Cultivars; Disease; Disease control; Disease transmission; Dwarf disease; Epidemiology; Fecundity; Genetic resources; Genotypes; Host plants; Host selection; Insects; leafhopper; Life Sciences; management of viral disease; Mastrevirus; Parameters; Phytopathology and phytopharmacy; Pipunculus alienus; Plant breeding; Plant diseases; Plant viruses; quantitative resistance; Vegetal Biology; Viral diseases; Viruses; Wheat
• ISSN: 0032-0862; 1365-3059
• DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13913

Defence mechanisms in plants have been naturally or artificially selected to cope with virus infection and/or insect colonization. This creates a range of host susceptibility to viruses and/or insects that can impact the epidemiology of insect‐borne viral diseases. Wheat dwarf disease (WDD), one of the most important viral diseases on small‐grain cereals, is caused by wheat dwarf virus (WDV), which is transmitted by the leafhopper Psammotettix alienus. In the current context of the unavailability of either WDV‐resistant/tolerant wheat cultivars or effective methods to control WDD in French cereal fields, the accurate characterization of WDV‐susceptible genotypes must be considered to improve management strategies against this viral disease. In this study, the impact of 12 wheat cultivars on epidemiological parameters related to the introduction (host selection and virus infection) and spread (insect performance and virus transmission) of WDD was evaluated. Results showed no differences between the tested cultivars for host selection made by P. alienus, whereas four tested cultivars (Complice, Filon, Hyking and Nemo) reduced survival and/or fecundity of the leafhopper. Characterization of virus–host interactions highlights the lower host and source quality of cv. Filon for WDV. Finally, multivariate analyses allowed the identification of cvs Filon, Boregar, Solindo CS, Complice and Hyking as less suitable hosts for WDV and/or P. alienus, suggesting that these cultivars could present interesting genetic resource(s) that should be considered for future breeding programmes against WDD. Variation in host quality of WDV‐susceptible wheat cultivars for isolate WDV‐w1 and Psammotettix alienus, and identification of the negative effect of cv. Filon on epidemiological process of wheat dwarf disease.