Loading…

Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism

The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “pres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical perspectives on accounting 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743
Main Authors: Hottegindre, Géraldine, Loison, Marie-Claire, Belze, Loïc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102743
container_title Critical perspectives on accounting
container_volume 100
creator Hottegindre, Géraldine
Loison, Marie-Claire
Belze, Loïc
description The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04665205v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S104523542400042X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S104523542400042X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLvcetGZpEmb6tWYHxMGguitIU1OtoyuHUk36b-3teKlV-eD9zlwHoSuKZlRQrPb7czs9YwRxvuZ5Tw9QRNKCpEUhRCnQ89FwlLBz9FFjFtCKOVFNkGfD12td95E3Djsa1cdoDaAv3y78TVuN4D1wfoWB1gfKt02ocNxrw3c4bemgmRf6c7Xa6xr-xMOPsJwyXS1Nz7uLtGZ01WEq986RR9Pj--LZbJ6fX5ZzFeJYTRtE1dKKQ03MssZI5oLYvKyZABlzgppiUltaSnI3IGTgkmbUeFKVkJuBSVplk7RzXh3oyu1D36nQ6ca7dVyvlLDjvAsE4yII-2zdMya0MQYwP0BlKhBptqqXqYaZKpRZs_cjwz0Txw9BBWNH0xZH8C0yjb-H_ob1MB8xQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</creator><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><description>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Audit ; Backstage ; Big 4 ; Business administration ; Economics and Finance ; European Commission ; Frontstage ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Strategic responses</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04665205$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</description><subject>Audit</subject><subject>Backstage</subject><subject>Big 4</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>European Commission</subject><subject>Frontstage</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strategic responses</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLvcetGZpEmb6tWYHxMGguitIU1OtoyuHUk36b-3teKlV-eD9zlwHoSuKZlRQrPb7czs9YwRxvuZ5Tw9QRNKCpEUhRCnQ89FwlLBz9FFjFtCKOVFNkGfD12td95E3Djsa1cdoDaAv3y78TVuN4D1wfoWB1gfKt02ocNxrw3c4bemgmRf6c7Xa6xr-xMOPsJwyXS1Nz7uLtGZ01WEq986RR9Pj--LZbJ6fX5ZzFeJYTRtE1dKKQ03MssZI5oLYvKyZABlzgppiUltaSnI3IGTgkmbUeFKVkJuBSVplk7RzXh3oyu1D36nQ6ca7dVyvlLDjvAsE4yII-2zdMya0MQYwP0BlKhBptqqXqYaZKpRZs_cjwz0Txw9BBWNH0xZH8C0yjb-H_ob1MB8xQ</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creator><creator>Loison, Marie-Claire</creator><creator>Belze, Loïc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><author>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audit</topic><topic>Backstage</topic><topic>Big 4</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>European Commission</topic><topic>Frontstage</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strategic responses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hottegindre, Géraldine</au><au>Loison, Marie-Claire</au><au>Belze, Loïc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>102743</spage><pages>102743-</pages><artnum>102743</artnum><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2354
ispartof Critical perspectives on accounting, 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743
issn 1045-2354
1095-9955
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04665205v1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Audit
Backstage
Big 4
Business administration
Economics and Finance
European Commission
Frontstage
Humanities and Social Sciences
Strategic responses
title Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamics%20of%20influence%20within%20the%20audit%20regulatory%20space:%20Role-playing%20and%20the%20rise%20of%20cynicism&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Hottegindre,%20G%C3%A9raldine&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=102743&rft.pages=102743-&rft.artnum=102743&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES104523542400042X%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true