Loading…
Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism
The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “pres...
Saved in:
Published in: | Critical perspectives on accounting 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102743 |
container_title | Critical perspectives on accounting |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Hottegindre, Géraldine Loison, Marie-Claire Belze, Loïc |
description | The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04665205v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S104523542400042X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S104523542400042X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLvcetGZpEmb6tWYHxMGguitIU1OtoyuHUk36b-3teKlV-eD9zlwHoSuKZlRQrPb7czs9YwRxvuZ5Tw9QRNKCpEUhRCnQ89FwlLBz9FFjFtCKOVFNkGfD12td95E3Djsa1cdoDaAv3y78TVuN4D1wfoWB1gfKt02ocNxrw3c4bemgmRf6c7Xa6xr-xMOPsJwyXS1Nz7uLtGZ01WEq986RR9Pj--LZbJ6fX5ZzFeJYTRtE1dKKQ03MssZI5oLYvKyZABlzgppiUltaSnI3IGTgkmbUeFKVkJuBSVplk7RzXh3oyu1D36nQ6ca7dVyvlLDjvAsE4yII-2zdMya0MQYwP0BlKhBptqqXqYaZKpRZs_cjwz0Txw9BBWNH0xZH8C0yjb-H_ob1MB8xQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</creator><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><description>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Audit ; Backstage ; Big 4 ; Business administration ; Economics and Finance ; European Commission ; Frontstage ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Strategic responses</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04665205$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</description><subject>Audit</subject><subject>Backstage</subject><subject>Big 4</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>European Commission</subject><subject>Frontstage</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Strategic responses</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLvcetGZpEmb6tWYHxMGguitIU1OtoyuHUk36b-3teKlV-eD9zlwHoSuKZlRQrPb7czs9YwRxvuZ5Tw9QRNKCpEUhRCnQ89FwlLBz9FFjFtCKOVFNkGfD12td95E3Djsa1cdoDaAv3y78TVuN4D1wfoWB1gfKt02ocNxrw3c4bemgmRf6c7Xa6xr-xMOPsJwyXS1Nz7uLtGZ01WEq986RR9Pj--LZbJ6fX5ZzFeJYTRtE1dKKQ03MssZI5oLYvKyZABlzgppiUltaSnI3IGTgkmbUeFKVkJuBSVplk7RzXh3oyu1D36nQ6ca7dVyvlLDjvAsE4yII-2zdMya0MQYwP0BlKhBptqqXqYaZKpRZs_cjwz0Txw9BBWNH0xZH8C0yjb-H_ob1MB8xQ</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creator><creator>Loison, Marie-Claire</creator><creator>Belze, Loïc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</title><author>Hottegindre, Géraldine ; Loison, Marie-Claire ; Belze, Loïc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audit</topic><topic>Backstage</topic><topic>Big 4</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>European Commission</topic><topic>Frontstage</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Strategic responses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hottegindre, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belze, Loïc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hottegindre, Géraldine</au><au>Loison, Marie-Claire</au><au>Belze, Loïc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>102743</spage><pages>102743-</pages><artnum>102743</artnum><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>The European Commission (EC) conducted a major reform of statutory audit between 2010 and 2014, with the primary aim of improving competition in the market. The Big 4, who were targeted by this reform, were strongly opposed to it. The present study employs the typology of Oliver (1991) and the “presentation of self” theory developed by Goffman (1956) to identify the strategic responses employed, frontstage and backstage, by the regulator (EC) and the regulatees (Big 4) to influence the outcome of the reform. The results reveal that passive strategic responses tend to take place frontstage, while active and aggressive strategies generally take place backstage. This work also reveals the incursion of the neoliberal model into the European regulatory arena, and allows us to characterize the Big 4 as cynical actors defending a commercial logic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9463</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-2354 |
ispartof | Critical perspectives on accounting, 2024-12, Vol.100, p.102743, Article 102743 |
issn | 1045-2354 1095-9955 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04665205v1 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Audit Backstage Big 4 Business administration Economics and Finance European Commission Frontstage Humanities and Social Sciences Strategic responses |
title | Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamics%20of%20influence%20within%20the%20audit%20regulatory%20space:%20Role-playing%20and%20the%20rise%20of%20cynicism&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Hottegindre,%20G%C3%A9raldine&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=102743&rft.pages=102743-&rft.artnum=102743&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102743&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES104523542400042X%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fb888c4c867220a450c7bb2eeb7298d0c3dbd1e87fef8528d615fb2be7d510363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |