The Value of Aortic Volume and Intraluminal Thrombus Quantification for Predicting Aortic Events after Endovascular Thoracic Aneurysm Repair

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine 2024-05, Vol.13 (10), p.2981
• Main Authors: De Masi, Mariangela, Guivier-Curien, Carine, Cortaredona, Sébastien, Omnes, Virgile, Bal, Laurence, Muselier, Baptiste, Bartoli, Axel, Gaudry, Marine, Piquet, Philippe, Deplano, Valérie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Aortic aneurysms; Aortic dissection; Aortic valve; Bacteriology; Blood clot; Blood clots; Cardiology and cardiovascular system; Coronary vessels; Emerging diseases; Human health and pathology; Infectious diseases; Life Sciences; Medical imaging; Microbiology and Parasitology; Migration; Morphology; Parasitology; Patients; Software; Surgery; Thrombosis; Tomography; Virology; Volumetric analysis
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102981

To assess the ability of the aortic aneurysm volume (AAV), aneurysmal lumen volume (ALV), and aneurysmal thrombus volume (ATV) to predict the need for aortic reintervention when using the maximal aortic diameter as a reference. This monocentric retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients who underwent successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat an atheromatous thoracic aortic aneurysm. All patients underwent clinical and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for 3 years after TEVAR. The patients were categorized into group 0 if no aortic reintervention was required during the follow-up period and categorized into group 1 if they experienced a type I or III endoleak or aneurysm diameter increase requiring intervention. The maximum aneurysm sac diameter and the AAV, ALV, and ATV were calculated using CTA images obtained preoperatively (T0) and at 6-12 months (T1), 24 months (T2), and 36 months (T3) postoperatively, and their changes over time were analyzed. Correlations between diameter and changes in AAV, ALV, and ATV were assessed, and the association between diameter and volume changes and reintervetion was examined. The cutoff values for predicting the need for reintervention was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The accuracy of volume change versus diameter change for predicting the need for reintervention was analyzed. There were no significant differences in terms of the mean aneurysm diameter or AAV, ALV or ATV between the groups at preoperative CTA or after one year of follow-up imaging. The mean ATV was higher in group 1 than in group 0 at 2 years (187.6 ± 86.3 mL vs. 114.7 ± 64.7 mL; = 0.057) and after 3 years (195.0 ± 86.7 mL vs. 82.1 ± 39.9 mL; = 0.013). The maximal diameter was greater in group 1 than in group 0 at 3 years (67.3 ± 9.5 mm vs. 55.3 ± 12.6 mm; = 0.044). The rate of AAV change between T0 and T1 was significantly higher in group 1 (7 ± 4.5%) than in group 0 (-6 ± 6.8%; < 0.001). The rate of ATV change between T1-T3 was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 0 (34 ± 40.9% vs. -13 ± 14.4% ( = 0.041)); similar results were observed for the rate of ATV change between T2 and T3 (27 ± 50.1% for group 1 vs. -8 ± 49.5% in group 0 ( < 0.001)). According to our multivariate analysis, the annual growth rate for AAV between T0 and T1 was the only independent factor that was significantly associated with aortic reintervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.84, OR = 1.57, = 0.02