Loading…

Comparison of 14C and 210Pb - 137Cs - 241Am dating methods of a recent bat guano deposit (Lot, SW France)

Bat guano deposits are increasingly used as records of past environmental changes, an approach that requires a precise chronology of the guano layers. This paper presents a comparison between the well-established 14C dating method and methods based on natural 210Pb excesses, (210Pb)ex, and artificia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary geochronology 2022-11, Vol.73, p.101400, Article 101400
Main Authors: Condomines, Michel, Bentaleb, Ilham, Filaiti, Eleni, Robert, Aloïs, Milhas, Claude
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Bat guano deposits are increasingly used as records of past environmental changes, an approach that requires a precise chronology of the guano layers. This paper presents a comparison between the well-established 14C dating method and methods based on natural 210Pb excesses, (210Pb)ex, and artificial radionuclides 137Cs and 241Am. The studied example is a bat guano deposit from a cave in SW France (the Brantites III cave), which is currently investigated for paleo-environmental reconstructions using stable isotopes. 14C data show that the upper part of the guano deposit accumulated during the last 150 years with a marked increase in accumulation rates after around 1960 AD. While the incorporation of atmospheric 14C in guano is a well-understood process, the origin of 210Pb excesses is more complex. Based on consideration of 137Cs and (210Pb)ex inventories recorded in undisturbed soils in France, and the measured inventories in the guano deposit, we suggest that most of the 210Pb excess is produced by 222Rn decay in the cave air and then adsorbed onto the guano. As Radon concentrations in caves can vary significantly on both short and long-term timescales, one needs to be cautious before applying the often-used CRS (constant rate of supply of 210Pb excess) model to guano dating. Our (210Pb)ex data are best interpreted by two successive periods of roughly constant, but widely different accumulation rates (0.3 cm/y and 2.6 cm/y before and after 1960, respectively) and (210Pb)ex fluxes. We suggest that these relatively abrupt variations result from a change in cave ventilation leading to a more favourable shelter for bats after 1960. The upper 40 cm of the deposit shows evidence of 210Pb mobility, adding a further complexity to the interpretation of (210Pb)ex profiles in guano deposits. However, the existence of well-defined 137Cs and 241Am peaks allows a precise identification of the year of maximum atmospheric fallouts (∼1963–1964). When the ages provided by artificial radionuclides are combined with the 210Pb-derived accumulation rates, an age model can be built, which is in good agreement with the 14C age model. This example shows that the (210Pb)ex method, when associated with 137Cs (241Am) data, can be used to date recent guano deposit, although its application is not as straightforward as the 14C method.
ISSN:1871-1014
1878-0350
DOI:10.1016/j.quageo.2022.101400