Evaluating the cost-consequence of a standardized strategy for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis (ULISSE study)

Main objectiveTo prospectively assess the cost-consequence of a standardized diagnostic strategy as to compared to an open one for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis. DesignThis was a prospective, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. MethodsWe included all consecutive patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-02, Vol.15
Main Authors: de Parisot, Audrey, Jamilloux, Yvan, Kodjikian, Laurent, Errera, Marie-Hélène, Sedira, Neila, Heron, Emmanuel, Pérard, Laurent, Cornut, Pierre-Loïc, Schneider, Christelle, Rivière, Sophie, Ollé, Priscille, Pugnet, Grégory, Cathébras, Pascal, Manoli, Pierre, Bodaghi, Bahram, Saadoun, David, Baillif, Stéphanie, Tieulie, Nathalie, André, Marc, Chiambaretta, Frédéric, Bonin, Nicolas, Bielefeld, Philip, Bron, Alain, Mouriaux, Frédéric, Bienvenu, Boris, Amamra, Nassira, Guerre, Pascale, Decullier, Evelyne, Sève, Pascal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Life Sciences
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Main objectiveTo prospectively assess the cost-consequence of a standardized diagnostic strategy as to compared to an open one for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis. DesignThis was a prospective, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. MethodsWe included all consecutive patients with uveitis who had visited at least one of the Departments of Ophthalmology. In the standardized group, patients had a minimal work-up
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0228918