Loading…

Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species

Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of forensic sciences 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274
Main Authors: Clua, Eric E., DeMarchi, Simon, Reid, Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3
container_end_page 2274
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2270
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 69
creator Clua, Eric E.
DeMarchi, Simon
Reid, Dennis
description Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1556-4029.15594
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04793374v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123009195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtv1UAQhVcIRC6Bmg6tREMKJ_vyY8soIgnoSmlIvdpdj2Nf_GLHTuSG3846DregYZoZHX1zNJpDyEfOznmsC56mWaKY0Odx0uoV2R2V12THmBAJ57o4Ie8QD4yxjGf8LTmRmvNCpMWO_L5HoENFxwAIvQf6iNS6bYwyLt1YLwi2pRPAVNOmpwf7hLQaAp1qWDv02Hhqe9su2OC65ZoJkLqFtjY8AJ2CnTs7DQ_QRxBrG35SHME3gO_Jm8q2CB9e-im5v_764-o22d_dfLu63CdeFFoluWOuTEud-VwBFN6WknkQKs11wctMguOFcpVzjjErhGLSM18KBqIAWalSnpKzzbe2rRlD09mwmME25vZyb1aNqVxLmatHHtkvGzuG4dcMOJmuQQ9ta3sYZjSSaaZVnuo0op__QQ_DHOInIsWFZEzzZ-pio3wYEANUxws4M2uMZg3NrKGZ5xjjxqcX39l1UB75v7lFIN2Ap6aF5X9-5vv13Wb8ByW8pyc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123009195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39118258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal biology ; Animals ; Bites and Stings - pathology ; bull shark ; Forensic Dentistry - methods ; Humans ; Jaw - anatomy &amp; histology ; Jaw - pathology ; Life Sciences ; Male ; marine predator identification ; shark bites ; Sharks ; Sharks - anatomy &amp; histology ; Species Specificity ; symphyseal teeth ; Teeth ; tiger shark ; Tooth ; white shark</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.</rights><rights>2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39118258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-perp.hal.science/hal-04793374$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMarchi, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</description><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - pathology</subject><subject>bull shark</subject><subject>Forensic Dentistry - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Jaw - pathology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>marine predator identification</subject><subject>shark bites</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Sharks - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>symphyseal teeth</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>tiger shark</subject><subject>Tooth</subject><subject>white shark</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkTtv1UAQhVcIRC6Bmg6tREMKJ_vyY8soIgnoSmlIvdpdj2Nf_GLHTuSG3846DregYZoZHX1zNJpDyEfOznmsC56mWaKY0Odx0uoV2R2V12THmBAJ57o4Ie8QD4yxjGf8LTmRmvNCpMWO_L5HoENFxwAIvQf6iNS6bYwyLt1YLwi2pRPAVNOmpwf7hLQaAp1qWDv02Hhqe9su2OC65ZoJkLqFtjY8AJ2CnTs7DQ_QRxBrG35SHME3gO_Jm8q2CB9e-im5v_764-o22d_dfLu63CdeFFoluWOuTEud-VwBFN6WknkQKs11wctMguOFcpVzjjErhGLSM18KBqIAWalSnpKzzbe2rRlD09mwmME25vZyb1aNqVxLmatHHtkvGzuG4dcMOJmuQQ9ta3sYZjSSaaZVnuo0op__QQ_DHOInIsWFZEzzZ-pio3wYEANUxws4M2uMZg3NrKGZ5xjjxqcX39l1UB75v7lFIN2Ap6aF5X9-5vv13Wb8ByW8pyc</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Clua, Eric E.</creator><creator>DeMarchi, Simon</creator><creator>Reid, Dennis</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><author>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - pathology</topic><topic>bull shark</topic><topic>Forensic Dentistry - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Jaw - pathology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>marine predator identification</topic><topic>shark bites</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Sharks - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>symphyseal teeth</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>tiger shark</topic><topic>Tooth</topic><topic>white shark</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMarchi, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clua, Eric E.</au><au>DeMarchi, Simon</au><au>Reid, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2270</spage><epage>2274</epage><pages>2270-2274</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><abstract>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39118258</pmid><doi>10.1111/1556-4029.15594</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04793374v1
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal biology
Animals
Bites and Stings - pathology
bull shark
Forensic Dentistry - methods
Humans
Jaw - anatomy & histology
Jaw - pathology
Life Sciences
Male
marine predator identification
shark bites
Sharks
Sharks - anatomy & histology
Species Specificity
symphyseal teeth
Teeth
tiger shark
Tooth
white shark
title Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20presence%20vs%20absence%20of%20symphyseal%20teeth%20in%20jaws%20for%20the%20forensic%20analysis%20of%20bites%20by%20large%20traumatogenic%20shark%20species&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Clua,%20Eric%20E.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2270&rft.epage=2274&rft.pages=2270-2274&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3123009195%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123009195&rft_id=info:pmid/39118258&rfr_iscdi=true