Loading…
Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species
Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of forensic sciences 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3 |
container_end_page | 2274 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2270 |
container_title | Journal of forensic sciences |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Clua, Eric E. DeMarchi, Simon Reid, Dennis |
description | Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1556-4029.15594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04793374v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123009195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtv1UAQhVcIRC6Bmg6tREMKJ_vyY8soIgnoSmlIvdpdj2Nf_GLHTuSG3846DregYZoZHX1zNJpDyEfOznmsC56mWaKY0Odx0uoV2R2V12THmBAJ57o4Ie8QD4yxjGf8LTmRmvNCpMWO_L5HoENFxwAIvQf6iNS6bYwyLt1YLwi2pRPAVNOmpwf7hLQaAp1qWDv02Hhqe9su2OC65ZoJkLqFtjY8AJ2CnTs7DQ_QRxBrG35SHME3gO_Jm8q2CB9e-im5v_764-o22d_dfLu63CdeFFoluWOuTEud-VwBFN6WknkQKs11wctMguOFcpVzjjErhGLSM18KBqIAWalSnpKzzbe2rRlD09mwmME25vZyb1aNqVxLmatHHtkvGzuG4dcMOJmuQQ9ta3sYZjSSaaZVnuo0op__QQ_DHOInIsWFZEzzZ-pio3wYEANUxws4M2uMZg3NrKGZ5xjjxqcX39l1UB75v7lFIN2Ap6aF5X9-5vv13Wb8ByW8pyc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123009195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39118258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal biology ; Animals ; Bites and Stings - pathology ; bull shark ; Forensic Dentistry - methods ; Humans ; Jaw - anatomy & histology ; Jaw - pathology ; Life Sciences ; Male ; marine predator identification ; shark bites ; Sharks ; Sharks - anatomy & histology ; Species Specificity ; symphyseal teeth ; Teeth ; tiger shark ; Tooth ; white shark</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.</rights><rights>2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39118258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-perp.hal.science/hal-04793374$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMarchi, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</description><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bites and Stings - pathology</subject><subject>bull shark</subject><subject>Forensic Dentistry - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Jaw - pathology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>marine predator identification</subject><subject>shark bites</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Sharks - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>symphyseal teeth</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>tiger shark</subject><subject>Tooth</subject><subject>white shark</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkTtv1UAQhVcIRC6Bmg6tREMKJ_vyY8soIgnoSmlIvdpdj2Nf_GLHTuSG3846DregYZoZHX1zNJpDyEfOznmsC56mWaKY0Odx0uoV2R2V12THmBAJ57o4Ie8QD4yxjGf8LTmRmvNCpMWO_L5HoENFxwAIvQf6iNS6bYwyLt1YLwi2pRPAVNOmpwf7hLQaAp1qWDv02Hhqe9su2OC65ZoJkLqFtjY8AJ2CnTs7DQ_QRxBrG35SHME3gO_Jm8q2CB9e-im5v_764-o22d_dfLu63CdeFFoluWOuTEud-VwBFN6WknkQKs11wctMguOFcpVzjjErhGLSM18KBqIAWalSnpKzzbe2rRlD09mwmME25vZyb1aNqVxLmatHHtkvGzuG4dcMOJmuQQ9ta3sYZjSSaaZVnuo0op__QQ_DHOInIsWFZEzzZ-pio3wYEANUxws4M2uMZg3NrKGZ5xjjxqcX39l1UB75v7lFIN2Ap6aF5X9-5vv13Wb8ByW8pyc</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Clua, Eric E.</creator><creator>DeMarchi, Simon</creator><creator>Reid, Dennis</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</title><author>Clua, Eric E. ; DeMarchi, Simon ; Reid, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bites and Stings - pathology</topic><topic>bull shark</topic><topic>Forensic Dentistry - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Jaw - pathology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>marine predator identification</topic><topic>shark bites</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Sharks - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>symphyseal teeth</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>tiger shark</topic><topic>Tooth</topic><topic>white shark</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clua, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMarchi, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clua, Eric E.</au><au>DeMarchi, Simon</au><au>Reid, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2270</spage><epage>2274</epage><pages>2270-2274</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><abstract>Identifying the species of shark responsible for a bite on humans is both complex and important for understanding and managing the shark risk. Depending on the species, tiny teeth may or may not be present in the symphyseal space at the junction of the upper and lower half‐jaws. In the case of bites, these tiny teeth (if present) often leave specific marks that may enable species to be quickly and reliably distinguished. We first present the anatomo‐morphological characteristics of the jaws of the three most traumatogenic species for humans which are the white, tiger, and bull sharks. The white shark has no symphyseal teeth, while the tiger and bull sharks do. On the basis of three confirmed real case studies involving those species, we then show that for the white shark, the wide symphyseal space between the first two teeth of each jaw usually leads to wounds including the presence of (quite) large flesh flaps, without any tooth imprint. Conversely, wounds following bites made by the tiger and bull sharks will generally leave characteristic small imprints of symphyseal teeth, especially in the case of incomplete or superficial bites. Although not systematic, this diagnostic approach provides fast, reliable, and clean results. The discrimination between two species with symphyseal teeth can then be made on the basis of complementary anatomic information such as jaw curvature and details linked to the anatomy of the teeth themselves, as well as the ecological context.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39118258</pmid><doi>10.1111/1556-4029.15594</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-2685</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1198 |
ispartof | Journal of forensic sciences, 2024-11, Vol.69 (6), p.2270-2274 |
issn | 0022-1198 1556-4029 1556-4029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04793374v1 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animal biology Animals Bites and Stings - pathology bull shark Forensic Dentistry - methods Humans Jaw - anatomy & histology Jaw - pathology Life Sciences Male marine predator identification shark bites Sharks Sharks - anatomy & histology Species Specificity symphyseal teeth Teeth tiger shark Tooth white shark |
title | Use of presence vs absence of symphyseal teeth in jaws for the forensic analysis of bites by large traumatogenic shark species |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20presence%20vs%20absence%20of%20symphyseal%20teeth%20in%20jaws%20for%20the%20forensic%20analysis%20of%20bites%20by%20large%20traumatogenic%20shark%20species&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Clua,%20Eric%20E.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2270&rft.epage=2274&rft.pages=2270-2274&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3123009195%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-7b0bd5d96c74ee8cad30ce2457981d63eb184bfbbb00a22403c0cd20e28e3f4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123009195&rft_id=info:pmid/39118258&rfr_iscdi=true |