Loading…

Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease

Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) has become a major public health issue. Hydroxyurea and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion are the cornerstone treatments. Erythrocytapheresis (ECP) is an automated method for transfusion exchange. Given that ECP requires more blood than conventional transfusion, t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.357-363
Main Authors: Michot, Jean-Marie, Driss, Françoise, Guitton, Corinne, Moh Klaren, Julia, Lefebvre, François, Chamillard, Xavier, Gallon, Philippe, Fourn, Erwan, Pela, Alain M., Tertian, Gérard, Le Bras, Philippe, Chantalat-Auger, Christelle, Delfraissy, Jean-François, Goujard, Cécile, Lambotte, Olivier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373
container_end_page 363
container_issue 2
container_start_page 357
container_title Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 55
creator Michot, Jean-Marie
Driss, Françoise
Guitton, Corinne
Moh Klaren, Julia
Lefebvre, François
Chamillard, Xavier
Gallon, Philippe
Fourn, Erwan
Pela, Alain M.
Tertian, Gérard
Le Bras, Philippe
Chantalat-Auger, Christelle
Delfraissy, Jean-François
Goujard, Cécile
Lambotte, Olivier
description Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) has become a major public health issue. Hydroxyurea and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion are the cornerstone treatments. Erythrocytapheresis (ECP) is an automated method for transfusion exchange. Given that ECP requires more blood than conventional transfusion, there is concern about alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion reactions. We evaluate the incidence of hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunization rates in patients receiving conventional blood transfusions and in patients participating in long‐term blood exchange programs with ECP. Study Design and Methods All hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunizations in SCD patients were recorded over the period 2006 to 2011. Conventional transfusions and ECP were compared. Results The cohort consisted of 188 SCD patients. The median (±SD) age was 23 (±14) years. The ECP and conventional transfusion groups comprised 49 and 139 patients, respectively. The prevalence of alloimmunization was 33% in the ECP group and 22% in the conventional transfusion group (p = 0.1797). The alloimmunization/RBC unit (RBCU) ratio was lower in the ECP group than in the conventional transfusion group (1.6 and 11.6 per 1000, respectively; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/trf.12875
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_01995062v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3589367861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EosuWA38AWeICEmn9kdjJsdp-wtJKqKgSF8vrTBq3ib3YCe3-e7yk3QMScxlp9Myrd-ZF6B0lBzTV4RCaA8pKWbxAM1pwmbGqKl6iGSE5zSjlbA-9ifGOEMIqQl-jPVawgspczFB30fej8y30evCdv7UGpw5BOwPYN9i0wbvtME1iM0brHYZH02p3CxE_2KHFEDZDosxm0OsWAkQbsXU4WnPfATbQdbi2EXSEffSq0V2Et099jn6cnlwvzrPl1dnF4miZmZyVRQYVo0ABaskNFaSWwDivV7yksoZVTsq6lCJvNCshZ0DqmheMNWXZEKmN4JLP0edJt9WdWgfb67BRXlt1frRU1kUIvSI0_YgI9psm_OOEr4P_NUIcVG_j1rd24MeoqCgKybgQVUI__IPe-TG4dMyWyisuquR1jj5NlAk-xgDNzgQlapuYSompv4kl9v2T4rjqod6RzxEl4HACHmwHm_8rqevvp8-S2bRh4wCPuw0d7pWQPJE3l2fq29fqcvHzy7G64X8AS2qwKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654936923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Michot, Jean-Marie ; Driss, Françoise ; Guitton, Corinne ; Moh Klaren, Julia ; Lefebvre, François ; Chamillard, Xavier ; Gallon, Philippe ; Fourn, Erwan ; Pela, Alain M. ; Tertian, Gérard ; Le Bras, Philippe ; Chantalat-Auger, Christelle ; Delfraissy, Jean-François ; Goujard, Cécile ; Lambotte, Olivier</creator><creatorcontrib>Michot, Jean-Marie ; Driss, Françoise ; Guitton, Corinne ; Moh Klaren, Julia ; Lefebvre, François ; Chamillard, Xavier ; Gallon, Philippe ; Fourn, Erwan ; Pela, Alain M. ; Tertian, Gérard ; Le Bras, Philippe ; Chantalat-Auger, Christelle ; Delfraissy, Jean-François ; Goujard, Cécile ; Lambotte, Olivier</creatorcontrib><description>Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) has become a major public health issue. Hydroxyurea and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion are the cornerstone treatments. Erythrocytapheresis (ECP) is an automated method for transfusion exchange. Given that ECP requires more blood than conventional transfusion, there is concern about alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion reactions. We evaluate the incidence of hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunization rates in patients receiving conventional blood transfusions and in patients participating in long‐term blood exchange programs with ECP. Study Design and Methods All hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunizations in SCD patients were recorded over the period 2006 to 2011. Conventional transfusions and ECP were compared. Results The cohort consisted of 188 SCD patients. The median (±SD) age was 23 (±14) years. The ECP and conventional transfusion groups comprised 49 and 139 patients, respectively. The prevalence of alloimmunization was 33% in the ECP group and 22% in the conventional transfusion group (p = 0.1797). The alloimmunization/RBC unit (RBCU) ratio was lower in the ECP group than in the conventional transfusion group (1.6 and 11.6 per 1000, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). Although patients in the ECP group received more than 10 times more RBCUs than patients in the conventional transfusion group (206 vs. 19 RBCUs per patient, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001), none of the four recorded hemolytic transfusion reactions (n = 4) occurred. Conclusion Regarding alloimmunization, ECP exhibits a good immunohematologic safety profile relative to conventional transfusion in a large SCD mainly adult cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.12875</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25251746</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRANAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anemia, Sickle Cell - therapy ; Child ; Cytapheresis ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Female ; Hemolysis ; Humans ; Immune Tolerance ; Immunology ; Incidence ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.357-363</ispartof><rights>2014 AABB</rights><rights>2014 AABB.</rights><rights>2015 AABB</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25251746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01995062$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michot, Jean-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driss, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitton, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moh Klaren, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamillard, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallon, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourn, Erwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pela, Alain M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tertian, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Bras, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantalat-Auger, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delfraissy, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goujard, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambotte, Olivier</creatorcontrib><title>Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) has become a major public health issue. Hydroxyurea and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion are the cornerstone treatments. Erythrocytapheresis (ECP) is an automated method for transfusion exchange. Given that ECP requires more blood than conventional transfusion, there is concern about alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion reactions. We evaluate the incidence of hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunization rates in patients receiving conventional blood transfusions and in patients participating in long‐term blood exchange programs with ECP. Study Design and Methods All hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunizations in SCD patients were recorded over the period 2006 to 2011. Conventional transfusions and ECP were compared. Results The cohort consisted of 188 SCD patients. The median (±SD) age was 23 (±14) years. The ECP and conventional transfusion groups comprised 49 and 139 patients, respectively. The prevalence of alloimmunization was 33% in the ECP group and 22% in the conventional transfusion group (p = 0.1797). The alloimmunization/RBC unit (RBCU) ratio was lower in the ECP group than in the conventional transfusion group (1.6 and 11.6 per 1000, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). Although patients in the ECP group received more than 10 times more RBCUs than patients in the conventional transfusion group (206 vs. 19 RBCUs per patient, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001), none of the four recorded hemolytic transfusion reactions (n = 4) occurred. Conclusion Regarding alloimmunization, ECP exhibits a good immunohematologic safety profile relative to conventional transfusion in a large SCD mainly adult cohort.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anemia, Sickle Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cytapheresis</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune Tolerance</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EosuWA38AWeICEmn9kdjJsdp-wtJKqKgSF8vrTBq3ib3YCe3-e7yk3QMScxlp9Myrd-ZF6B0lBzTV4RCaA8pKWbxAM1pwmbGqKl6iGSE5zSjlbA-9ifGOEMIqQl-jPVawgspczFB30fej8y30evCdv7UGpw5BOwPYN9i0wbvtME1iM0brHYZH02p3CxE_2KHFEDZDosxm0OsWAkQbsXU4WnPfATbQdbi2EXSEffSq0V2Et099jn6cnlwvzrPl1dnF4miZmZyVRQYVo0ABaskNFaSWwDivV7yksoZVTsq6lCJvNCshZ0DqmheMNWXZEKmN4JLP0edJt9WdWgfb67BRXlt1frRU1kUIvSI0_YgI9psm_OOEr4P_NUIcVG_j1rd24MeoqCgKybgQVUI__IPe-TG4dMyWyisuquR1jj5NlAk-xgDNzgQlapuYSompv4kl9v2T4rjqod6RzxEl4HACHmwHm_8rqevvp8-S2bRh4wCPuw0d7pWQPJE3l2fq29fqcvHzy7G64X8AS2qwKg</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Michot, Jean-Marie</creator><creator>Driss, Françoise</creator><creator>Guitton, Corinne</creator><creator>Moh Klaren, Julia</creator><creator>Lefebvre, François</creator><creator>Chamillard, Xavier</creator><creator>Gallon, Philippe</creator><creator>Fourn, Erwan</creator><creator>Pela, Alain M.</creator><creator>Tertian, Gérard</creator><creator>Le Bras, Philippe</creator><creator>Chantalat-Auger, Christelle</creator><creator>Delfraissy, Jean-François</creator><creator>Goujard, Cécile</creator><creator>Lambotte, Olivier</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease</title><author>Michot, Jean-Marie ; Driss, Françoise ; Guitton, Corinne ; Moh Klaren, Julia ; Lefebvre, François ; Chamillard, Xavier ; Gallon, Philippe ; Fourn, Erwan ; Pela, Alain M. ; Tertian, Gérard ; Le Bras, Philippe ; Chantalat-Auger, Christelle ; Delfraissy, Jean-François ; Goujard, Cécile ; Lambotte, Olivier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anemia, Sickle Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cytapheresis</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune Tolerance</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michot, Jean-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driss, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitton, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moh Klaren, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamillard, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallon, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourn, Erwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pela, Alain M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tertian, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Bras, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantalat-Auger, Christelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delfraissy, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goujard, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambotte, Olivier</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michot, Jean-Marie</au><au>Driss, Françoise</au><au>Guitton, Corinne</au><au>Moh Klaren, Julia</au><au>Lefebvre, François</au><au>Chamillard, Xavier</au><au>Gallon, Philippe</au><au>Fourn, Erwan</au><au>Pela, Alain M.</au><au>Tertian, Gérard</au><au>Le Bras, Philippe</au><au>Chantalat-Auger, Christelle</au><au>Delfraissy, Jean-François</au><au>Goujard, Cécile</au><au>Lambotte, Olivier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>357-363</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><coden>TRANAT</coden><abstract>Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) has become a major public health issue. Hydroxyurea and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion are the cornerstone treatments. Erythrocytapheresis (ECP) is an automated method for transfusion exchange. Given that ECP requires more blood than conventional transfusion, there is concern about alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion reactions. We evaluate the incidence of hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunization rates in patients receiving conventional blood transfusions and in patients participating in long‐term blood exchange programs with ECP. Study Design and Methods All hemolytic transfusion reactions and alloimmunizations in SCD patients were recorded over the period 2006 to 2011. Conventional transfusions and ECP were compared. Results The cohort consisted of 188 SCD patients. The median (±SD) age was 23 (±14) years. The ECP and conventional transfusion groups comprised 49 and 139 patients, respectively. The prevalence of alloimmunization was 33% in the ECP group and 22% in the conventional transfusion group (p = 0.1797). The alloimmunization/RBC unit (RBCU) ratio was lower in the ECP group than in the conventional transfusion group (1.6 and 11.6 per 1000, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001). Although patients in the ECP group received more than 10 times more RBCUs than patients in the conventional transfusion group (206 vs. 19 RBCUs per patient, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001), none of the four recorded hemolytic transfusion reactions (n = 4) occurred. Conclusion Regarding alloimmunization, ECP exhibits a good immunohematologic safety profile relative to conventional transfusion in a large SCD mainly adult cohort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25251746</pmid><doi>10.1111/trf.12875</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1132
ispartof Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015-02, Vol.55 (2), p.357-363
issn 0041-1132
1537-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_01995062v1
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anemia, Sickle Cell - therapy
Child
Cytapheresis
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Female
Hemolysis
Humans
Immune Tolerance
Immunology
Incidence
Life Sciences
Male
Santé publique et épidémiologie
title Immunohematologic tolerance of chronic transfusion exchanges with erythrocytapheresis in sickle cell disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immunohematologic%20tolerance%20of%20chronic%20transfusion%20exchanges%20with%20erythrocytapheresis%20in%20sickle%20cell%20disease&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Michot,%20Jean-Marie&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=357-363&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft.coden=TRANAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.12875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3589367861%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4285-e921e1eed73c160d7e233db3817deb408d8764fa28e42e0dd3522f88f07ac6373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654936923&rft_id=info:pmid/25251746&rfr_iscdi=true