Loading…
A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses
A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce aerosols from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. Using compositional analysis, the dust produced was compared to (i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.1-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Qu, Z. Trabelsi, A. Losno, R. Monna, F. Nowak, S. Masmoudi, M. Quisefit, J.‐P. |
description | A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce aerosols from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. Using compositional analysis, the dust produced was compared to (i) dust generated in a wind tunnel by the same soils, (ii) fine sieved and (iii) original bulk soils, and (iv) naturally occurring aerosol samples collected in the same area. The relative quartz content strongly decreases from bulk to fine soils, and again from fine soils to both wind tunnel and vibration‐generated aerosols. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) clearly shows (i) a silica dilution effect in bulk soils, and (ii) that if silica is removed from the composition, the elemental compositions of fine soils and generated aerosols are similar but differ from bulk soils. Both aerosol generation methods produce material with chemical compositions that are also close to those measured in field‐sampled aerosols, and the fine soil composition is much closer to that of field and laboratory aerosols than to the parent soil. Aerosols generated from soils in the laboratory, either using a vibrating system or a wind tunnel, can be used as surrogates of the particles collected directly in the field.
Plain Language Summary
A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce particles from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. The chemical composition of the dust produced was compared to another dust generator (a wind tunnel), fine‐sieved soil, original bulk soils, and finally naturally occurring dust found in the same area. Both dust generators produce similar samples which look very different from bulk soils.
Key Points
Compositional analysis using biplots and Aitchison distance is a valuable tool for chemical variation comparisons
Dust aerosol can be extracted from soil using vibrations as well as wind friction
Figures of merit of a new small size dust generator system for fast extraction of dust from parent soil |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JD032224 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_03584796v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388907791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhoMoWLQ3f8CCN7G638l6C622lohgVbwtu-2mbkmzcTdR8u9NrBRPzmE-Xp55GZgoOkPwCkEsrjFEYj6BBGNMD6IBRlyMEiH44b6P346jYQgb2EUCCWV0EG1TkCntvKqdb8GkCTWYmtL8zCCtqqK15Rq8Wt0p1pWgdmDhbAEWalsV5gY82B4u3NouVafWzaoFqlyBsdtWLth-p9PTLrXBhNPoKFdFMMPfehK93N0-j2ej7HF6P06zkaKQiBEXMV5qiigWiiNCE85yqI0gsc5jrSlkOV5RTpRmjEOq8UoIuCTMIMxjQgQ5iS52vu-qkJW3W-Vb6ZSVszSTtgyNhIQlNBb8E3Xw-Q6uvPtoTKjlxjW-uzhITJJEwDgWPXW5o5beheBNvvdFUPYPkH8f0OFkh3_ZwrT_snI-fZowjpgg38y3hTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388907791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Qu, Z. ; Trabelsi, A. ; Losno, R. ; Monna, F. ; Nowak, S. ; Masmoudi, M. ; Quisefit, J.‐P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Qu, Z. ; Trabelsi, A. ; Losno, R. ; Monna, F. ; Nowak, S. ; Masmoudi, M. ; Quisefit, J.‐P.</creatorcontrib><description>A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce aerosols from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. Using compositional analysis, the dust produced was compared to (i) dust generated in a wind tunnel by the same soils, (ii) fine sieved and (iii) original bulk soils, and (iv) naturally occurring aerosol samples collected in the same area. The relative quartz content strongly decreases from bulk to fine soils, and again from fine soils to both wind tunnel and vibration‐generated aerosols. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) clearly shows (i) a silica dilution effect in bulk soils, and (ii) that if silica is removed from the composition, the elemental compositions of fine soils and generated aerosols are similar but differ from bulk soils. Both aerosol generation methods produce material with chemical compositions that are also close to those measured in field‐sampled aerosols, and the fine soil composition is much closer to that of field and laboratory aerosols than to the parent soil. Aerosols generated from soils in the laboratory, either using a vibrating system or a wind tunnel, can be used as surrogates of the particles collected directly in the field.
Plain Language Summary
A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce particles from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. The chemical composition of the dust produced was compared to another dust generator (a wind tunnel), fine‐sieved soil, original bulk soils, and finally naturally occurring dust found in the same area. Both dust generators produce similar samples which look very different from bulk soils.
Key Points
Compositional analysis using biplots and Aitchison distance is a valuable tool for chemical variation comparisons
Dust aerosol can be extracted from soil using vibrations as well as wind friction
Figures of merit of a new small size dust generator system for fast extraction of dust from parent soil</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JD032224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Archaeology and Prehistory ; Atmospheric particulates ; Chemical composition ; CoDA ; compositional analysis ; Data analysis ; Dilution ; Dust ; dust characterization ; Dust emission ; dust generation ; Dust storms ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Geophysics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Laboratories ; laboratory aerosol ; Production methods ; Sciences of the Universe ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Soil ; Soil composition ; Soil erosion ; Soils ; Vibration ; Vibration analysis ; Wind erosion ; Wind tunnels</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0246-862X ; 0000-0001-7771-2434</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://insu.hal.science/insu-03584796$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qu, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trabelsi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Losno, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monna, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masmoudi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quisefit, J.‐P.</creatorcontrib><title>A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce aerosols from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. Using compositional analysis, the dust produced was compared to (i) dust generated in a wind tunnel by the same soils, (ii) fine sieved and (iii) original bulk soils, and (iv) naturally occurring aerosol samples collected in the same area. The relative quartz content strongly decreases from bulk to fine soils, and again from fine soils to both wind tunnel and vibration‐generated aerosols. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) clearly shows (i) a silica dilution effect in bulk soils, and (ii) that if silica is removed from the composition, the elemental compositions of fine soils and generated aerosols are similar but differ from bulk soils. Both aerosol generation methods produce material with chemical compositions that are also close to those measured in field‐sampled aerosols, and the fine soil composition is much closer to that of field and laboratory aerosols than to the parent soil. Aerosols generated from soils in the laboratory, either using a vibrating system or a wind tunnel, can be used as surrogates of the particles collected directly in the field.
Plain Language Summary
A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce particles from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. The chemical composition of the dust produced was compared to another dust generator (a wind tunnel), fine‐sieved soil, original bulk soils, and finally naturally occurring dust found in the same area. Both dust generators produce similar samples which look very different from bulk soils.
Key Points
Compositional analysis using biplots and Aitchison distance is a valuable tool for chemical variation comparisons
Dust aerosol can be extracted from soil using vibrations as well as wind friction
Figures of merit of a new small size dust generator system for fast extraction of dust from parent soil</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Archaeology and Prehistory</subject><subject>Atmospheric particulates</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>CoDA</subject><subject>compositional analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>dust characterization</subject><subject>Dust emission</subject><subject>dust generation</subject><subject>Dust storms</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>laboratory aerosol</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil composition</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Vibration analysis</subject><subject>Wind erosion</subject><subject>Wind tunnels</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhoMoWLQ3f8CCN7G638l6C622lohgVbwtu-2mbkmzcTdR8u9NrBRPzmE-Xp55GZgoOkPwCkEsrjFEYj6BBGNMD6IBRlyMEiH44b6P346jYQgb2EUCCWV0EG1TkCntvKqdb8GkCTWYmtL8zCCtqqK15Rq8Wt0p1pWgdmDhbAEWalsV5gY82B4u3NouVafWzaoFqlyBsdtWLth-p9PTLrXBhNPoKFdFMMPfehK93N0-j2ej7HF6P06zkaKQiBEXMV5qiigWiiNCE85yqI0gsc5jrSlkOV5RTpRmjEOq8UoIuCTMIMxjQgQ5iS52vu-qkJW3W-Vb6ZSVszSTtgyNhIQlNBb8E3Xw-Q6uvPtoTKjlxjW-uzhITJJEwDgWPXW5o5beheBNvvdFUPYPkH8f0OFkh3_ZwrT_snI-fZowjpgg38y3hTM</recordid><startdate>20200416</startdate><enddate>20200416</enddate><creator>Qu, Z.</creator><creator>Trabelsi, A.</creator><creator>Losno, R.</creator><creator>Monna, F.</creator><creator>Nowak, S.</creator><creator>Masmoudi, M.</creator><creator>Quisefit, J.‐P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-862X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-2434</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200416</creationdate><title>A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses</title><author>Qu, Z. ; Trabelsi, A. ; Losno, R. ; Monna, F. ; Nowak, S. ; Masmoudi, M. ; Quisefit, J.‐P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Archaeology and Prehistory</topic><topic>Atmospheric particulates</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>CoDA</topic><topic>compositional analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>dust characterization</topic><topic>Dust emission</topic><topic>dust generation</topic><topic>Dust storms</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>laboratory aerosol</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil composition</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Vibration analysis</topic><topic>Wind erosion</topic><topic>Wind tunnels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qu, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trabelsi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Losno, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monna, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masmoudi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quisefit, J.‐P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qu, Z.</au><au>Trabelsi, A.</au><au>Losno, R.</au><au>Monna, F.</au><au>Nowak, S.</au><au>Masmoudi, M.</au><au>Quisefit, J.‐P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2020-04-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce aerosols from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. Using compositional analysis, the dust produced was compared to (i) dust generated in a wind tunnel by the same soils, (ii) fine sieved and (iii) original bulk soils, and (iv) naturally occurring aerosol samples collected in the same area. The relative quartz content strongly decreases from bulk to fine soils, and again from fine soils to both wind tunnel and vibration‐generated aerosols. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) clearly shows (i) a silica dilution effect in bulk soils, and (ii) that if silica is removed from the composition, the elemental compositions of fine soils and generated aerosols are similar but differ from bulk soils. Both aerosol generation methods produce material with chemical compositions that are also close to those measured in field‐sampled aerosols, and the fine soil composition is much closer to that of field and laboratory aerosols than to the parent soil. Aerosols generated from soils in the laboratory, either using a vibrating system or a wind tunnel, can be used as surrogates of the particles collected directly in the field.
Plain Language Summary
A laboratory study was carried out using a vibrating system (SyGAVib) to produce particles from four soils collected in the central Tunisian region around Sfax. The aim of this device is to mimic dust emission by natural wind erosion. The chemical composition of the dust produced was compared to another dust generator (a wind tunnel), fine‐sieved soil, original bulk soils, and finally naturally occurring dust found in the same area. Both dust generators produce similar samples which look very different from bulk soils.
Key Points
Compositional analysis using biplots and Aitchison distance is a valuable tool for chemical variation comparisons
Dust aerosol can be extracted from soil using vibrations as well as wind friction
Figures of merit of a new small size dust generator system for fast extraction of dust from parent soil</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JD032224</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-862X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-2434</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2020-04, Vol.125 (7), p.1-n/a |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_03584796v1 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerosols Archaeology and Prehistory Atmospheric particulates Chemical composition CoDA compositional analysis Data analysis Dilution Dust dust characterization Dust emission dust generation Dust storms Emission analysis Emissions Geophysics Humanities and Social Sciences Laboratories laboratory aerosol Production methods Sciences of the Universe Silica Silicon dioxide Soil Soil composition Soil erosion Soils Vibration Vibration analysis Wind erosion Wind tunnels |
title | A Laboratory Dust Generator Applying Vibration to Soil Sample: Mineralogical Study and Compositional Analyses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Laboratory%20Dust%20Generator%20Applying%20Vibration%20to%20Soil%20Sample:%20Mineralogical%20Study%20and%20Compositional%20Analyses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Qu,%20Z.&rft.date=2020-04-16&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JD032224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2388907791%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4039-6972cb41429a6134865f0be937bf7bb405f2d463ab55604b2d990c35e12673393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388907791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |