Loading…

Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats

Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in De...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurophysiology 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183
Main Authors: Snyder, Russell L, Vollmer, Maike, Moore, Charlotte M, Rebscher, Stephen J, Leake, Patricia A, Beitel, Ralph E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623
container_end_page 183
container_issue 1
container_start_page 166
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 84
creator Snyder, Russell L
Vollmer, Maike
Moore, Charlotte M
Rebscher, Stephen J
Leake, Patricia A
Beitel, Ralph E
description Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated ( r 2  = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_84_1_166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71255372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0Eomlhzwp5xW4G2xOPx8sq9CUVWkH3luO5bhw548EPQf49jlLUbhCra12d813JH0IfKGkp5ezzdmoZIaQdli1tad-_Qou6Zg3lcniNFoTUd0eEOEGnKW0rKThhb9EJJYOUVC4XyH-HNIcpQcLB4pvJQnQh4lXw3pniS8LfoMQK4Bzw-W72LpcRmq9hLF5nGKuSozbBbDzoiC88mByd0R7fF39IdRP-Atrilc7pHXpjdd2-f5pn6MflxcPqurm9u7pZnd82ZklIbno7WJBCM8rJ2kph-zUzwAYYNddCGmGF7piGykktQVJYSzOMBiixPevO0Kdj6hzDzwIpq51LBrzXE4SSlKCM8078H6SC86Hv-gqSI2hiSCmCVXN0Ox33ihJ1KEJtJ3UoQg1LRVUtoiofn7LLegfjC-H488_HN-5x88tFUPNmn1zw4XF_iHuRxP4NXhbvH-B3rsZfQc2j7f4AWdymPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17558636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><source>American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish &amp; Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list)</source><source>American Physiological Society Free</source><creator>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><description>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated ( r 2  = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10899194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cats ; Cochlea - physiology ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - physiopathology ; Deafness - therapy ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrophysiology ; Inferior Colliculi - cytology ; Inferior Colliculi - physiology ; Neurons - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10899194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebscher, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leake, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated ( r 2  = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Cochlea - physiology</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - physiopathology</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Inferior Colliculi - cytology</subject><subject>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0Eomlhzwp5xW4G2xOPx8sq9CUVWkH3luO5bhw548EPQf49jlLUbhCra12d813JH0IfKGkp5ezzdmoZIaQdli1tad-_Qou6Zg3lcniNFoTUd0eEOEGnKW0rKThhb9EJJYOUVC4XyH-HNIcpQcLB4pvJQnQh4lXw3pniS8LfoMQK4Bzw-W72LpcRmq9hLF5nGKuSozbBbDzoiC88mByd0R7fF39IdRP-Atrilc7pHXpjdd2-f5pn6MflxcPqurm9u7pZnd82ZklIbno7WJBCM8rJ2kph-zUzwAYYNddCGmGF7piGykktQVJYSzOMBiixPevO0Kdj6hzDzwIpq51LBrzXE4SSlKCM8078H6SC86Hv-gqSI2hiSCmCVXN0Ox33ihJ1KEJtJ3UoQg1LRVUtoiofn7LLegfjC-H488_HN-5x88tFUPNmn1zw4XF_iHuRxP4NXhbvH-B3rsZfQc2j7f4AWdymPQ</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Snyder, Russell L</creator><creator>Vollmer, Maike</creator><creator>Moore, Charlotte M</creator><creator>Rebscher, Stephen J</creator><creator>Leake, Patricia A</creator><creator>Beitel, Ralph E</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><author>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Cochlea - physiology</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - physiopathology</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Inferior Colliculi - cytology</topic><topic>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebscher, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leake, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Russell L</au><au>Vollmer, Maike</au><au>Moore, Charlotte M</au><au>Rebscher, Stephen J</au><au>Leake, Patricia A</au><au>Beitel, Ralph E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>166-183</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was 104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz, respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses. These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were uncorrelated ( r 2  = 0.101). Several parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to 1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>10899194</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_84_1_166
source American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish & Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list); American Physiological Society Free
subjects Animals
Cats
Cochlea - physiology
Cochlear Implants
Deafness - physiopathology
Deafness - therapy
Electric Stimulation
Electrophysiology
Inferior Colliculi - cytology
Inferior Colliculi - physiology
Neurons - physiology
title Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20of%20Inferior%20Colliculus%20Neurons%20to%20Amplitude-Modulated%20Intracochlear%20Electrical%20Pulses%20in%20Deaf%20Cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Snyder,%20Russell%20L&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=166-183&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E71255372%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17558636&rft_id=info:pmid/10899194&rfr_iscdi=true