Loading…
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats
Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0526 Snyder, Russell L., Maike Vollmer, Charlotte M. Moore, Stephen J. Rebscher, Patricia A. Leake, and Ralph E. Beitel. Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in De...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623 |
container_end_page | 183 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Journal of neurophysiology |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Snyder, Russell L Vollmer, Maike Moore, Charlotte M Rebscher, Stephen J Leake, Patricia A Beitel, Ralph E |
description | Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco,
California 94143-0526
Snyder, Russell L.,
Maike Vollmer,
Charlotte M. Moore,
Stephen J. Rebscher,
Patricia A. Leake, and
Ralph E. Beitel.
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated
Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear
prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic
signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus
(IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the
maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the
maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent
with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all
low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was
104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC
neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates
when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these
neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the
remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz,
respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated
frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses.
These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were
uncorrelated ( r 2 = 0.101). Several
parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of
modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and
modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit
responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to
1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit
ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and
signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_84_1_166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71255372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0Eomlhzwp5xW4G2xOPx8sq9CUVWkH3luO5bhw548EPQf49jlLUbhCra12d813JH0IfKGkp5ezzdmoZIaQdli1tad-_Qou6Zg3lcniNFoTUd0eEOEGnKW0rKThhb9EJJYOUVC4XyH-HNIcpQcLB4pvJQnQh4lXw3pniS8LfoMQK4Bzw-W72LpcRmq9hLF5nGKuSozbBbDzoiC88mByd0R7fF39IdRP-Atrilc7pHXpjdd2-f5pn6MflxcPqurm9u7pZnd82ZklIbno7WJBCM8rJ2kph-zUzwAYYNddCGmGF7piGykktQVJYSzOMBiixPevO0Kdj6hzDzwIpq51LBrzXE4SSlKCM8078H6SC86Hv-gqSI2hiSCmCVXN0Ox33ihJ1KEJtJ3UoQg1LRVUtoiofn7LLegfjC-H488_HN-5x88tFUPNmn1zw4XF_iHuRxP4NXhbvH-B3rsZfQc2j7f4AWdymPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17558636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><source>American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish & Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list)</source><source>American Physiological Society Free</source><creator>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><description>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco,
California 94143-0526
Snyder, Russell L.,
Maike Vollmer,
Charlotte M. Moore,
Stephen J. Rebscher,
Patricia A. Leake, and
Ralph E. Beitel.
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated
Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear
prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic
signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus
(IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the
maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the
maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent
with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all
low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was
104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC
neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates
when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these
neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the
remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz,
respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated
frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses.
These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were
uncorrelated ( r 2 = 0.101). Several
parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of
modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and
modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit
responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to
1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit
ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and
signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10899194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cats ; Cochlea - physiology ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - physiopathology ; Deafness - therapy ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrophysiology ; Inferior Colliculi - cytology ; Inferior Colliculi - physiology ; Neurons - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10899194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebscher, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leake, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco,
California 94143-0526
Snyder, Russell L.,
Maike Vollmer,
Charlotte M. Moore,
Stephen J. Rebscher,
Patricia A. Leake, and
Ralph E. Beitel.
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated
Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear
prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic
signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus
(IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the
maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the
maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent
with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all
low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was
104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC
neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates
when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these
neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the
remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz,
respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated
frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses.
These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were
uncorrelated ( r 2 = 0.101). Several
parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of
modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and
modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit
responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to
1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit
ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and
signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Cochlea - physiology</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - physiopathology</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Inferior Colliculi - cytology</subject><subject>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEURi0Eomlhzwp5xW4G2xOPx8sq9CUVWkH3luO5bhw548EPQf49jlLUbhCra12d813JH0IfKGkp5ezzdmoZIaQdli1tad-_Qou6Zg3lcniNFoTUd0eEOEGnKW0rKThhb9EJJYOUVC4XyH-HNIcpQcLB4pvJQnQh4lXw3pniS8LfoMQK4Bzw-W72LpcRmq9hLF5nGKuSozbBbDzoiC88mByd0R7fF39IdRP-Atrilc7pHXpjdd2-f5pn6MflxcPqurm9u7pZnd82ZklIbno7WJBCM8rJ2kph-zUzwAYYNddCGmGF7piGykktQVJYSzOMBiixPevO0Kdj6hzDzwIpq51LBrzXE4SSlKCM8078H6SC86Hv-gqSI2hiSCmCVXN0Ox33ihJ1KEJtJ3UoQg1LRVUtoiofn7LLegfjC-H488_HN-5x88tFUPNmn1zw4XF_iHuRxP4NXhbvH-B3rsZfQc2j7f4AWdymPQ</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Snyder, Russell L</creator><creator>Vollmer, Maike</creator><creator>Moore, Charlotte M</creator><creator>Rebscher, Stephen J</creator><creator>Leake, Patricia A</creator><creator>Beitel, Ralph E</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</title><author>Snyder, Russell L ; Vollmer, Maike ; Moore, Charlotte M ; Rebscher, Stephen J ; Leake, Patricia A ; Beitel, Ralph E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Cochlea - physiology</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - physiopathology</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Inferior Colliculi - cytology</topic><topic>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Russell L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmer, Maike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Charlotte M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebscher, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leake, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitel, Ralph E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Russell L</au><au>Vollmer, Maike</au><au>Moore, Charlotte M</au><au>Rebscher, Stephen J</au><au>Leake, Patricia A</au><au>Beitel, Ralph E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>166-183</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>Epstein Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco,
California 94143-0526
Snyder, Russell L.,
Maike Vollmer,
Charlotte M. Moore,
Stephen J. Rebscher,
Patricia A. Leake, and
Ralph E. Beitel.
Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated
Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 166-183, 2000. Current cochlear
prostheses use amplitude-modulated pulse trains to encode acoustic
signals. In this study we examined the responses of inferior colliculus
(IC) neurons to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated pulses and compared the
maximum unmodulated pulse rate (Fmax) to which they responded with the
maximum modulation frequency (maxFm) that they followed. Consistent
with previous results, responses to unmodulated pulses were all
low-pass functions of pulse rate. Mean Fmax to unmodulated pulses was
104 pulses per second (pps) and modal Fmax was 60 pps. Above Fmax IC
neurons ceased responding except for an onset burst at the beginning of the stimulus. However, IC neurons responded to much higher pulse rates
when these pulses were amplitude modulated; 74% were relatively insensitive to carrier rate and responded to all modulated carriers including those exceeding 600 pps. In contrast, the responses of these
neurons (70%) were low-pass functions of modulation frequency, and the
remaining (30%) had band-pass functions with a maxFm of 42 and 34 Hz,
respectively. Thus temporal resolution of IC neurons for modulated
frequencies is significantly lower than that for unmodulated pulses.
These two measures of temporal resolution (Fmax and maxFm) were
uncorrelated ( r 2 = 0.101). Several
parameters influenced the amplitude and temporal structure of
modulation responses including modulation depth, overall intensity and
modulation-to-carrier rate ratio. We observed distortions in unit
responses to amplitude-modulated signals when this ratio was 1/4 to
1/6. Since most current cochlear implant speech processors permit
ratios that are significantly greater than this, severe distortion and
signal degradation may occur frequently in these devices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>10899194</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3077 |
ispartof | Journal of neurophysiology, 2000-07, Vol.84 (1), p.166-183 |
issn | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_84_1_166 |
source | American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish & Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list); American Physiological Society Free |
subjects | Animals Cats Cochlea - physiology Cochlear Implants Deafness - physiopathology Deafness - therapy Electric Stimulation Electrophysiology Inferior Colliculi - cytology Inferior Colliculi - physiology Neurons - physiology |
title | Responses of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Amplitude-Modulated Intracochlear Electrical Pulses in Deaf Cats |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20of%20Inferior%20Colliculus%20Neurons%20to%20Amplitude-Modulated%20Intracochlear%20Electrical%20Pulses%20in%20Deaf%20Cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Snyder,%20Russell%20L&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=166-183&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E71255372%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-6f8fe97a2150bf97f6b2ce28eda5a79c7f7a32ae6f89a9e91eb9c8dce10f623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17558636&rft_id=info:pmid/10899194&rfr_iscdi=true |