Loading…
Early Versus Late Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
We investigated the clinical and laxity testing results at 5 years' followup in patients who had early or late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Twenty-three patients (Group I) were treated within 15 days of injury. Fifty-nine patients (Group II) were treated more than 3 months after i...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of sports medicine 1995-12, Vol.23 (6), p.690 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; jpn |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We investigated the clinical and laxity testing results at 5 years' followup in patients who had early or late anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Twenty-three patients (Group I) were treated within 15 days of injury. Fifty-nine patients (Group
II) were treated more than 3 months after injury. Patellar tendon reconstruction and fascia lata graft augmented with a ligament
augmentation device were the techniques used in both groups. According to the Inter national Knee Documentation Committee
rating scale, 17 patients in Group I and 38 patients in Group II had satis factory results. The Lysholm score was good in
all Group I patients and in 55 Group II patients. Flexion-extension deficits were comparable for both groups. Eighteen pa
tients (78%) in Group I demonstrated satisfactory results according to the KT-2000 arthrometer testing, compared with 44 (75%)
in Group II. No associated lesions were present in 12 (52%) cases in Group I, compared with 26 (44%) cases in Group II. Return
to sports at the preop erative level was obtained by 21 (91 %) patients in Group I, compared with 42 (71 %) in Group II. The
patients who had reconstruction during the early phase returned to sports activities sooner and had better clinical and laxity
testing results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/036354659502300610 |