Loading…
Prevention of Injuries Among Male Soccer Players
Background: This study was conducted to investigate whether the most common injuries in soccer could be prevented, and to determine if a simple questionnaire could identify players at increased risk. Hypothesis: Introduction of targeted exercise programs to male soccer players with a history of prev...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1052 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: This study was conducted to investigate whether the most common injuries in soccer could be prevented, and to determine if
a simple questionnaire could identify players at increased risk.
Hypothesis: Introduction of targeted exercise programs to male soccer players with a history of previous injury or reduced function in
the ankle, knee, hamstring, or groin will prevent injuries.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: A total of 508 players representing 31 teams were included in the study. A questionnaire indicating previous injury and/or
reduced function as inclusion criteria was used to divide the players into high-risk (HR) (76%) and low-risk (LR) groups.
The HR players were randomized individually into an HR intervention group or HR control group.
Results: A total of 505 injuries were reported, sustained by 56% of the players. The total injury incidence was a mean of 3.2 (95%
confidence interval [CI], 2.5â3.9) in the LR control group, 5.3 (95% CI, 4.6â6.0) in the HR control group ( P = .0001 vs the LR control group), and 4.9 (95% CI, 4.3â5.6) in the HR intervention group ( P = .50 vs the HR control group). For the main outcome measure, the sum of injuries to the ankle, knee, hamstring, and groin,
there was also a significantly lower injury risk in the LR control group compared with the 2 other groups, but no difference
between the HR intervention group and the HR control group. Compliance with the training programs in the HR intervention group
was poor, with only 27.5% in the ankle group, 29.2% in the knee group, 21.1% in the hamstring group, and 19.4% in the groin
defined as having carried out the minimum recommended training volume.
Conclusion: The players with a significantly increased risk of injury were able to be identified through the use of a questionnaire,
but player compliance with the training programs prescribed was low and any effect of the intervention on injury risk could
not be detected.
Keywords:
football
injury prevention
ankle injuries
knee injuries
hamstring injuries
groin injuries
risk factors
randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0363546508314432 |