Loading…

The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan

This paper shows that the causative *s- prefix and the nominalizing *-s suffix are both present in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. (1) In particular, it shows that Old Chinese voicing alternation in intransitive/transitive verbs, e.g. 敗 *brads ‘ruined, defeated’ /敗 *prads ‘to ruin, to defeat’, is due to the dev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:語言暨語言學 2012-01, Vol.13 (1), p.001-028
Main Author: 梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)
Format: Article
Language:Chinese
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 028
container_issue 1
container_start_page 001
container_title 語言暨語言學
container_volume 13
creator 梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)
description This paper shows that the causative *s- prefix and the nominalizing *-s suffix are both present in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. (1) In particular, it shows that Old Chinese voicing alternation in intransitive/transitive verbs, e.g. 敗 *brads ‘ruined, defeated’ /敗 *prads ‘to ruin, to defeat’, is due to the devoicing effect of the causative *sprefix:*s-brads > *prads. (2) The *-s suffix generally had a nominalizing function,where the derived noun is the patient of the action represented by the verb. In Modern Chinese this suffix is now reflected in the ‘departing’ tone, which confirms Haudricourt’s theory that the ‘departing’ tone came from the *-s suffix. For example OC *grjang 量平 ‘to measure’ : *grangs 量去 ‘a measure’ :: WT ‘grang-ba ‘to number, to count’ : grangs ‘a number’. (3) It is well known that the reflexes of the *-s suffix mark the perfective in many Tibeto-Burman languages, including Written Tibetan. In Old Chinese the pair 張平 *trjang ‘to stretch, extend’ / 脹去*trjangs ‘to be stretched, distended’ illustrates t
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_hyread_00173254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00173254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hyweb_hyread_001732543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFissKgkAUQGdRkJR_0OL-wMA4prmXok0PykWbkCve8sI0gjMV9vWFtG914JwzEkGUqlRmWp8nInSOKxV9TaYTFYhL0RDk-HDo-UngJKCtYdfe2aLhN9sbSAdsYW9qyBu25GhYjmTQUw1b9J66YTl0rW_liW0rC67Io52J8RWNo_DHqZivV0W-kU3_oqps-o6wLpWKlrFOFvGf_AGlBjzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</creator><creatorcontrib>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</creatorcontrib><description>This paper shows that the causative *s- prefix and the nominalizing *-s suffix are both present in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. (1) In particular, it shows that Old Chinese voicing alternation in intransitive/transitive verbs, e.g. 敗 *brads ‘ruined, defeated’ /敗 *prads ‘to ruin, to defeat’, is due to the devoicing effect of the causative *sprefix:*s-brads > *prads. (2) The *-s suffix generally had a nominalizing function,where the derived noun is the patient of the action represented by the verb. In Modern Chinese this suffix is now reflected in the ‘departing’ tone, which confirms Haudricourt’s theory that the ‘departing’ tone came from the *-s suffix. For example OC *grjang 量平 ‘to measure’ : *grangs 量去 ‘a measure’ :: WT ‘grang-ba ‘to number, to count’ : grangs ‘a number’. (3) It is well known that the reflexes of the *-s suffix mark the perfective in many Tibeto-Burman languages, including Written Tibetan. In Old Chinese the pair 張平 *trjang ‘to stretch, extend’ / 脹去*trjangs ‘to be stretched, distended’ illustrates t</description><identifier>ISSN: 1606-822X</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>台灣: 中央研究院語言學研究所</publisher><subject>A&HCI ; causative s- prefix ; MEDLINE ; nominalizing -s suffix ; perfective -s suffix ; Scopus ; Sino-Tibetan morphology ; SSCI ; THCI ; 使動化 s- 前綴 ; 原始漢藏語的形態 ; 名物化 -s 後綴 ; 既事式 -s 後綴</subject><ispartof>語言暨語言學, 2012-01, Vol.13 (1), p.001-028</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</creatorcontrib><title>The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan</title><title>語言暨語言學</title><description>This paper shows that the causative *s- prefix and the nominalizing *-s suffix are both present in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. (1) In particular, it shows that Old Chinese voicing alternation in intransitive/transitive verbs, e.g. 敗 *brads ‘ruined, defeated’ /敗 *prads ‘to ruin, to defeat’, is due to the devoicing effect of the causative *sprefix:*s-brads > *prads. (2) The *-s suffix generally had a nominalizing function,where the derived noun is the patient of the action represented by the verb. In Modern Chinese this suffix is now reflected in the ‘departing’ tone, which confirms Haudricourt’s theory that the ‘departing’ tone came from the *-s suffix. For example OC *grjang 量平 ‘to measure’ : *grangs 量去 ‘a measure’ :: WT ‘grang-ba ‘to number, to count’ : grangs ‘a number’. (3) It is well known that the reflexes of the *-s suffix mark the perfective in many Tibeto-Burman languages, including Written Tibetan. In Old Chinese the pair 張平 *trjang ‘to stretch, extend’ / 脹去*trjangs ‘to be stretched, distended’ illustrates t</description><subject>A&HCI</subject><subject>causative s- prefix</subject><subject>MEDLINE</subject><subject>nominalizing -s suffix</subject><subject>perfective -s suffix</subject><subject>Scopus</subject><subject>Sino-Tibetan morphology</subject><subject>SSCI</subject><subject>THCI</subject><subject>使動化 s- 前綴</subject><subject>原始漢藏語的形態</subject><subject>名物化 -s 後綴</subject><subject>既事式 -s 後綴</subject><issn>1606-822X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFissKgkAUQGdRkJR_0OL-wMA4prmXok0PykWbkCve8sI0gjMV9vWFtG914JwzEkGUqlRmWp8nInSOKxV9TaYTFYhL0RDk-HDo-UngJKCtYdfe2aLhN9sbSAdsYW9qyBu25GhYjmTQUw1b9J66YTl0rW_liW0rC67Io52J8RWNo_DHqZivV0W-kU3_oqps-o6wLpWKlrFOFvGf_AGlBjzg</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</creator><general>中央研究院語言學研究所</general><scope>9RA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan</title><author>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hyweb_hyread_001732543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>A&HCI</topic><topic>causative s- prefix</topic><topic>MEDLINE</topic><topic>nominalizing -s suffix</topic><topic>perfective -s suffix</topic><topic>Scopus</topic><topic>Sino-Tibetan morphology</topic><topic>SSCI</topic><topic>THCI</topic><topic>使動化 s- 前綴</topic><topic>原始漢藏語的形態</topic><topic>名物化 -s 後綴</topic><topic>既事式 -s 後綴</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</creatorcontrib><collection>HyRead台灣全文資料庫</collection><jtitle>語言暨語言學</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>梅祖麟(Mei, Tsu-lin)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan</atitle><jtitle>語言暨語言學</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>001</spage><epage>028</epage><pages>001-028</pages><issn>1606-822X</issn><abstract>This paper shows that the causative *s- prefix and the nominalizing *-s suffix are both present in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. (1) In particular, it shows that Old Chinese voicing alternation in intransitive/transitive verbs, e.g. 敗 *brads ‘ruined, defeated’ /敗 *prads ‘to ruin, to defeat’, is due to the devoicing effect of the causative *sprefix:*s-brads > *prads. (2) The *-s suffix generally had a nominalizing function,where the derived noun is the patient of the action represented by the verb. In Modern Chinese this suffix is now reflected in the ‘departing’ tone, which confirms Haudricourt’s theory that the ‘departing’ tone came from the *-s suffix. For example OC *grjang 量平 ‘to measure’ : *grangs 量去 ‘a measure’ :: WT ‘grang-ba ‘to number, to count’ : grangs ‘a number’. (3) It is well known that the reflexes of the *-s suffix mark the perfective in many Tibeto-Burman languages, including Written Tibetan. In Old Chinese the pair 張平 *trjang ‘to stretch, extend’ / 脹去*trjangs ‘to be stretched, distended’ illustrates t</abstract><cop>台灣</cop><pub>中央研究院語言學研究所</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1606-822X
ispartof 語言暨語言學, 2012-01, Vol.13 (1), p.001-028
issn 1606-822X
language chi
recordid cdi_hyweb_hyread_00173254
source Social Science Premium Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects A&HCI
causative s- prefix
MEDLINE
nominalizing -s suffix
perfective -s suffix
Scopus
Sino-Tibetan morphology
SSCI
THCI
使動化 s- 前綴
原始漢藏語的形態
名物化 -s 後綴
既事式 -s 後綴
title The Causative s- and Nominalizing -s in Old Chinese and Related Matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A36%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Causative%20s-%20and%20Nominalizing%20-s%20in%20Old%20Chinese%20and%20Related%20Matters%20in%20Proto-Sino-Tibetan&rft.jtitle=%E8%AA%9E%E8%A8%80%E6%9A%A8%E8%AA%9E%E8%A8%80%E5%AD%B8&rft.au=%E6%A2%85%E7%A5%96%E9%BA%9F(Mei,%20Tsu-lin)&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=001&rft.epage=028&rft.pages=001-028&rft.issn=1606-822X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Chyweb%3E00173254%3C/hyweb%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-hyweb_hyread_001732543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true