Loading…
Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments
BACKGROUND:Few articles in the literature identify and describe the instruments that are regularly used by scholars to measure cultural competence in healthcare providers. PURPOSE:This study reviews the psychometric properties of the several instruments that are used regularly to assess the cultural...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of Nursing Research 2017-06, Vol.25 (3), p.174-186 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4683-f542da5dcc7eb502c484f639f3c0324f41059149e9e6fe824721be3706457a903 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 186 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | The Journal of Nursing Research |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Lin, Chia-Jung Lee, Chia-Kuei Huang, Mei-Chih |
description | BACKGROUND:Few articles in the literature identify and describe the instruments that are regularly used by scholars to measure cultural competence in healthcare providers.
PURPOSE:This study reviews the psychometric properties of the several instruments that are used regularly to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers.
METHODS:Researchers conducted a systematic review of the relevant articles that were published between 1983 and 2013 and listed on academic and government Web sites or on one or more of the following databasesCINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, Psyc ARTICLES, PubMed, Cochrane, Pro Quest, Google Scholar, CNKI (China), and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Taiwan).
RESULTS:This study included 57 articles. Ten instruments from these articles were identified and analyzed. These instruments included five that were presented in English and five that were presented in Chinese. All were self-administered and based on respondent perceptions. Five of the 10 instruments were designed to measure cultural competence, two were designed to measure cultural sensitivity, two were designed to measure transcultural self-efficacy, and one was designed to measure cultural awareness. The six cultural dimensions addressed by these instruments were attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviors, desires, and encounters. An expert panel validated the content of the 10 instruments. The subscales explained 33%–90% of the variance in scores for eight of the instruments. The reliability of the 10 instruments was estimated based on the internal consistency, which ranged from .57 to .97.
CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review may assist researchers to choose appropriate instruments to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers. The findings of this review indicate that no single instrument is adequate to evaluate cultural competence in all contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000153 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_hyread_00454958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>16823141_201706_201706050001_201706050001_174_186</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>1896888596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4683-f542da5dcc7eb502c484f639f3c0324f41059149e9e6fe824721be3706457a903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UttuEzEQtRCIlsIfVGgfedni-4W3KALSqgJUQEK8WI53Vtmwl9T2Nsrf18uGChDCLzPWnHPGPjMInRN8QbBRr7d9uMC_HyLYI3RKDNelkeLb45xLTUtGODlBz2LcYkyZZOopOqGKESyxOkXfl2ObxuDaYjl0O0jQeyiGuliBa9PGuwDFpzDcNRWE-KZYFJ8PMUHnUuOLG7hrYD-BFzFCjB30qbjsYwrjlMbn6Ent2ggvjvEMfX339styVV5_fH-5XFyXjkvNylpwWjlRea9gLTD1XPNaMlMzjxnlNSdYGMINGJA1aMoVJWtgCksulDOYnaFXs-4uDLcjxGS7JnpoW9fDMEZLtJFaa2FkhvIZ6sMQY4Da7kLTuXCwBNvJVXv14cb-7WqmvTx2GNcdVA-kXzZmgJ4B-6FN2akf7biHYDc_TXzQzhP7lzb_DzVjGGeKlhST_OPMKScizbTzmbY57GFtN4cArspwLrgROpdXc9k1oUmN3Q5j6PMQ7LQS00bYWfAYsJhe8-eFKJ6tk-weJVuv1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1896888596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments</title><source>ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources</source><creator>Lin, Chia-Jung ; Lee, Chia-Kuei ; Huang, Mei-Chih</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chia-Jung ; Lee, Chia-Kuei ; Huang, Mei-Chih</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Few articles in the literature identify and describe the instruments that are regularly used by scholars to measure cultural competence in healthcare providers.
PURPOSE:This study reviews the psychometric properties of the several instruments that are used regularly to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers.
METHODS:Researchers conducted a systematic review of the relevant articles that were published between 1983 and 2013 and listed on academic and government Web sites or on one or more of the following databasesCINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, Psyc ARTICLES, PubMed, Cochrane, Pro Quest, Google Scholar, CNKI (China), and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Taiwan).
RESULTS:This study included 57 articles. Ten instruments from these articles were identified and analyzed. These instruments included five that were presented in English and five that were presented in Chinese. All were self-administered and based on respondent perceptions. Five of the 10 instruments were designed to measure cultural competence, two were designed to measure cultural sensitivity, two were designed to measure transcultural self-efficacy, and one was designed to measure cultural awareness. The six cultural dimensions addressed by these instruments were attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviors, desires, and encounters. An expert panel validated the content of the 10 instruments. The subscales explained 33%–90% of the variance in scores for eight of the instruments. The reliability of the 10 instruments was estimated based on the internal consistency, which ranged from .57 to .97.
CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review may assist researchers to choose appropriate instruments to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers. The findings of this review indicate that no single instrument is adequate to evaluate cultural competence in all contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1682-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-965X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000153</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27310607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>台灣: 台灣護理學會</publisher><subject>cultural competence ; healthcare providers ; instrument ; MEDLINE ; Nursing ; SCIE ; Scopus ; SSCI ; systematic review ; TSCI ; TSSCI</subject><ispartof>The Journal of Nursing Research, 2017-06, Vol.25 (3), p.174-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the Taiwan Nurses Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the Taiwan Nurses Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4683-f542da5dcc7eb502c484f639f3c0324f41059149e9e6fe824721be3706457a903</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27310607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chia-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chia-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Mei-Chih</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments</title><title>The Journal of Nursing Research</title><addtitle>J Nurs Res</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Few articles in the literature identify and describe the instruments that are regularly used by scholars to measure cultural competence in healthcare providers.
PURPOSE:This study reviews the psychometric properties of the several instruments that are used regularly to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers.
METHODS:Researchers conducted a systematic review of the relevant articles that were published between 1983 and 2013 and listed on academic and government Web sites or on one or more of the following databasesCINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, Psyc ARTICLES, PubMed, Cochrane, Pro Quest, Google Scholar, CNKI (China), and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Taiwan).
RESULTS:This study included 57 articles. Ten instruments from these articles were identified and analyzed. These instruments included five that were presented in English and five that were presented in Chinese. All were self-administered and based on respondent perceptions. Five of the 10 instruments were designed to measure cultural competence, two were designed to measure cultural sensitivity, two were designed to measure transcultural self-efficacy, and one was designed to measure cultural awareness. The six cultural dimensions addressed by these instruments were attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviors, desires, and encounters. An expert panel validated the content of the 10 instruments. The subscales explained 33%–90% of the variance in scores for eight of the instruments. The reliability of the 10 instruments was estimated based on the internal consistency, which ranged from .57 to .97.
CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review may assist researchers to choose appropriate instruments to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers. The findings of this review indicate that no single instrument is adequate to evaluate cultural competence in all contexts.</description><subject>cultural competence</subject><subject>healthcare providers</subject><subject>instrument</subject><subject>MEDLINE</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>SCIE</subject><subject>Scopus</subject><subject>SSCI</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>TSCI</subject><subject>TSSCI</subject><issn>1682-3141</issn><issn>1948-965X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UttuEzEQtRCIlsIfVGgfedni-4W3KALSqgJUQEK8WI53Vtmwl9T2Nsrf18uGChDCLzPWnHPGPjMInRN8QbBRr7d9uMC_HyLYI3RKDNelkeLb45xLTUtGODlBz2LcYkyZZOopOqGKESyxOkXfl2ObxuDaYjl0O0jQeyiGuliBa9PGuwDFpzDcNRWE-KZYFJ8PMUHnUuOLG7hrYD-BFzFCjB30qbjsYwrjlMbn6Ent2ggvjvEMfX339styVV5_fH-5XFyXjkvNylpwWjlRea9gLTD1XPNaMlMzjxnlNSdYGMINGJA1aMoVJWtgCksulDOYnaFXs-4uDLcjxGS7JnpoW9fDMEZLtJFaa2FkhvIZ6sMQY4Da7kLTuXCwBNvJVXv14cb-7WqmvTx2GNcdVA-kXzZmgJ4B-6FN2akf7biHYDc_TXzQzhP7lzb_DzVjGGeKlhST_OPMKScizbTzmbY57GFtN4cArspwLrgROpdXc9k1oUmN3Q5j6PMQ7LQS00bYWfAYsJhe8-eFKJ6tk-weJVuv1g</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Lin, Chia-Jung</creator><creator>Lee, Chia-Kuei</creator><creator>Huang, Mei-Chih</creator><general>台灣護理學會</general><general>臺灣護理學會</general><general>Copyright by the Taiwan Nurses Association</general><scope>188</scope><scope>9RA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments</title><author>Lin, Chia-Jung ; Lee, Chia-Kuei ; Huang, Mei-Chih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4683-f542da5dcc7eb502c484f639f3c0324f41059149e9e6fe824721be3706457a903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>cultural competence</topic><topic>healthcare providers</topic><topic>instrument</topic><topic>MEDLINE</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>SCIE</topic><topic>Scopus</topic><topic>SSCI</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>TSCI</topic><topic>TSSCI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chia-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chia-Kuei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Mei-Chih</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>HyRead台灣全文資料庫</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Nursing Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Chia-Jung</au><au>Lee, Chia-Kuei</au><au>Huang, Mei-Chih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Nursing Research</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Res</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>174-186</pages><issn>1682-3141</issn><eissn>1948-965X</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Few articles in the literature identify and describe the instruments that are regularly used by scholars to measure cultural competence in healthcare providers.
PURPOSE:This study reviews the psychometric properties of the several instruments that are used regularly to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers.
METHODS:Researchers conducted a systematic review of the relevant articles that were published between 1983 and 2013 and listed on academic and government Web sites or on one or more of the following databasesCINAHL, MEDLINE, ERIC, PsycINFO, Psyc ARTICLES, PubMed, Cochrane, Pro Quest, Google Scholar, CNKI (China), and the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Taiwan).
RESULTS:This study included 57 articles. Ten instruments from these articles were identified and analyzed. These instruments included five that were presented in English and five that were presented in Chinese. All were self-administered and based on respondent perceptions. Five of the 10 instruments were designed to measure cultural competence, two were designed to measure cultural sensitivity, two were designed to measure transcultural self-efficacy, and one was designed to measure cultural awareness. The six cultural dimensions addressed by these instruments were attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviors, desires, and encounters. An expert panel validated the content of the 10 instruments. The subscales explained 33%–90% of the variance in scores for eight of the instruments. The reliability of the 10 instruments was estimated based on the internal consistency, which ranged from .57 to .97.
CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review may assist researchers to choose appropriate instruments to assess the cultural competence of healthcare providers. The findings of this review indicate that no single instrument is adequate to evaluate cultural competence in all contexts.</abstract><cop>台灣</cop><pub>台灣護理學會</pub><pmid>27310607</pmid><doi>10.1097/jnr.0000000000000153</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1682-3141 |
ispartof | The Journal of Nursing Research, 2017-06, Vol.25 (3), p.174-186 |
issn | 1682-3141 1948-965X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hyweb_hyread_00454958 |
source | ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources |
subjects | cultural competence healthcare providers instrument MEDLINE Nursing SCIE Scopus SSCI systematic review TSCI TSSCI |
title | Cultural Competence of Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A41%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Competence%20of%20Healthcare%20Providers:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Assessment%20Instruments&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Nursing%20Research&rft.au=Lin,%20Chia-Jung&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=174-186&rft.issn=1682-3141&rft.eissn=1948-965X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896888596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4683-f542da5dcc7eb502c484f639f3c0324f41059149e9e6fe824721be3706457a903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1896888596&rft_id=info:pmid/27310607&rft_airiti_id=16823141_201706_201706050001_201706050001_174_186&rfr_iscdi=true |