Loading…
Investigation of therapeutic effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and translocation in immunosuppressed rats infected with Shigella sonnei
Aim: To investigate the therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) and detect blood and tissue penetrations of S. boulardii and Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei) in immunosuppressed rats infected with S. sonnei. Methods: Forty rats were divided into four groups: Group A (immunosuppresse...
Saved in:
Published in: | Experimental biomedical research 2020-07, Vol.3 (3), p.141-148 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim: To investigate the therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) and detect
blood and tissue penetrations of S. boulardii and Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei) in immunosuppressed
rats infected with S. sonnei.
Methods: Forty rats were divided into four groups: Group A (immunosuppressed, not-treated); Group
B (immunosuppressed, treated with S. boulardii); Group C (immunosuppressed, infected with S.
sonnei, treated with S. boulardii); Group D (immunosuppressed, infected with S. sonnei). After taking
samples for blood cultures, the rats were sacrificed. The large bowel, liver, spleen and mesenteric
lymph nodes (MLN) were removed for microbiological examination.
Results: S. boulardii in group B and S. sonnei in group D were isolated from blood in some rats.
Statistical analysis of our data, showed that the numbers of translocated colonies in the liver and
spleen were relatively higher for S. boulardii in Group B and for S. sonnei in Group D, without
reaching levels of statistical significance. For MLN, colony counts in Group B was higher than Group
C and A showing statistical significance.
Conclusion: The administration of S. boulardii showed promising results for the therapy of S. sonnei
infection in immunosuppressed rats, but therapeutic usage of S. boulardii should be carefully assessed
by taking into consideration the risk it poses versus potential benefits in risk groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2618-6454 2618-6454 |
DOI: | 10.30714/j-ebr.2020361049 |