Various Channel Coding Schemes for 5G

In this study we have compared the LDPC, Turbo and Polar codes in 5th Generation communication system; which is justified by their superior Bit Error Rate performance and adjustability to accommodate a broad range of length of codes and their speeds. We are doing the error correction coding for 5th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muskan, Amrit, Raj, Tuhina, Nisar, Tehmina, Abbas, Mehak, Naz, Shaheen, Tiwari, Usha
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
5G telecommunication
Codes
Coding Schemes
Convolution
LDPC
Parity check codes
Polar
Simulation
Systematics
Turbo
Turbo codes
Wireless communication
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study we have compared the LDPC, Turbo and Polar codes in 5th Generation communication system; which is justified by their superior Bit Error Rate performance and adjustability to accommodate a broad range of length of codes and their speeds. We are doing the error correction coding for 5th generation deployment. 5th generation wireless transmission channel coding schemes are having trouble meeting user needs for device telecommunication. For recommending the best coding method for the 5th generation telecommunication system for this study compares several channel coding schemes (Turbo Code, Polar Code, LDPC Codes, SC & NSCC codes on an AWGN with Binary-PSK scheme of speed of code half. In device telecommunication, the estimation of the various coding scheme depends on fidelity, difficulty, latency, and stability in accordance with user subscriber requirements. Better fidelity, reduced lag, and high information reliability are the primary user needs of device communication for the 5th channel coding scheme. The investigation of the data reveals that the SCC is the better coding for the 5th generation telecommunication system for brief information transmit (64k to 1024 bits) in device type communication regarding enhanced flexibility, low-level encoding computational latency, and much better dependability.
ISSN:2688-0288
DOI:10.1109/SCEECS57921.2023.10062998