Loading…

Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI

Ethical guidelines are an asset for artificial intelligence(AI) development and conforming to them will soon be a procedural requirement once the EU AI Act gets ratified in the European parliament. However, developers often lack explicit knowledge on how to apply these guidelines during the system d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ronanki, Krishna
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 280
container_issue
container_start_page 278
container_title
container_volume
creator Ronanki, Krishna
description Ethical guidelines are an asset for artificial intelligence(AI) development and conforming to them will soon be a procedural requirement once the EU AI Act gets ratified in the European parliament. However, developers often lack explicit knowledge on how to apply these guidelines during the system development process. A literature review of different ethical guidelines from various countries and organizations has revealed inconsistencies in the principles presented and the terminology used to describe such principles. This research begins by identifying the limitations of existing ethical AI development frameworks in performing requirements engineering(RE) processes during the development of trustworthy AI. Recommendations to address those limitations will be proposed to make the frameworks more applicable in the RE process to foster the development of trustworthy AI. This could lead to wider adoption, greater productivity of the AI systems, and reduced workload on humans for non-cognitive tasks. Considering the impact of some of the newer foundation models like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, the vision for this research project is to work towards the development of holistic operationalisable RE guidelines for the development and implementation of trustworthy AI not only on a product level but also on process level.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00075
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>swepub_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10172807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10172807</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>oai_gup_ub_gu_se_333947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-1aa424d0842cbe5212a2fb32861a2c909688de47a0c2804da8f7413956bb07233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkUtLw0AUhccXWGr_gYus3KXeeSSTWbgoodViQdC6HibJJA41D2cSSv-9EyuCLl1dzj3nXLh8CN1gmGMM4nadvizDtK071Zi2iZI4SeYECJ0DAI9O0ExwkdAIKCEx5adoQiLOQiwoO_vjnaMJEA5h5BOXaOacySDCgmAKfIIet-1e2cIFqgkW6zDVTW9NHjzrj8FYXXvpgmVTmUZra5oqWFlV631rd0HZ2mBrB9d71b8dfPsKXZTq3enZ95yi19Vymz6Em6f7dbrYhIoy1odYKUZYAQkjeaYjgokiZUZJEmNFcgHC_1poxhXkJAFWqKTkDFMRxVkGnFA6ReHxrtvrbshkZ02t7EG2yshq6KRfVYN0WlJKBeM-f33MG631TxoD5v7-aN8dbZXXMmvbnfOeHCnIkYL8TUGOFOQXBZlZo0vf5__r009kqYr_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Ronanki, Krishna</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronanki, Krishna</creatorcontrib><description>Ethical guidelines are an asset for artificial intelligence(AI) development and conforming to them will soon be a procedural requirement once the EU AI Act gets ratified in the European parliament. However, developers often lack explicit knowledge on how to apply these guidelines during the system development process. A literature review of different ethical guidelines from various countries and organizations has revealed inconsistencies in the principles presented and the terminology used to describe such principles. This research begins by identifying the limitations of existing ethical AI development frameworks in performing requirements engineering(RE) processes during the development of trustworthy AI. Recommendations to address those limitations will be proposed to make the frameworks more applicable in the RE process to foster the development of trustworthy AI. This could lead to wider adoption, greater productivity of the AI systems, and reduced workload on humans for non-cognitive tasks. Considering the impact of some of the newer foundation models like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, the vision for this research project is to work towards the development of holistic operationalisable RE guidelines for the development and implementation of trustworthy AI not only on a product level but also on process level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-5257</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9798350322637</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-1934</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9798350322637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEPAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press</publisher><subject>AI co-worker ; Artificial intelligence ; Ethical AI ; Ethics ; EU AI Act ; Frameworks ; Guidelines ; Human-centered computing ; Organizations ; Productivity ; Programvaruteknik ; Requirements Engineering ; Social and professional topics ; Social and professional topics -- Computing -- technology policy ; Social and professional topics -- Professional topics ; Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession ; Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession -- Codes of ethics ; Software and its engineering ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software -- Requirements analysis ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software development process management ; Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools ; Software Engineering ; Task analysis ; Terminology ; Trustworthy AI</subject><ispartof>2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), 2023, p.278-280</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10172807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,780,784,789,790,885,4050,4051,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10172807$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/333947$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronanki, Krishna</creatorcontrib><title>Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI</title><title>2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)</title><addtitle>ICSE-COMPANION</addtitle><description>Ethical guidelines are an asset for artificial intelligence(AI) development and conforming to them will soon be a procedural requirement once the EU AI Act gets ratified in the European parliament. However, developers often lack explicit knowledge on how to apply these guidelines during the system development process. A literature review of different ethical guidelines from various countries and organizations has revealed inconsistencies in the principles presented and the terminology used to describe such principles. This research begins by identifying the limitations of existing ethical AI development frameworks in performing requirements engineering(RE) processes during the development of trustworthy AI. Recommendations to address those limitations will be proposed to make the frameworks more applicable in the RE process to foster the development of trustworthy AI. This could lead to wider adoption, greater productivity of the AI systems, and reduced workload on humans for non-cognitive tasks. Considering the impact of some of the newer foundation models like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, the vision for this research project is to work towards the development of holistic operationalisable RE guidelines for the development and implementation of trustworthy AI not only on a product level but also on process level.</description><subject>AI co-worker</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Ethical AI</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>EU AI Act</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Human-centered computing</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Programvaruteknik</subject><subject>Requirements Engineering</subject><subject>Social and professional topics</subject><subject>Social and professional topics -- Computing -- technology policy</subject><subject>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics</subject><subject>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession</subject><subject>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession -- Codes of ethics</subject><subject>Software and its engineering</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software -- Requirements analysis</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software development process management</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools</subject><subject>Software Engineering</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Trustworthy AI</subject><issn>0270-5257</issn><issn>2574-1934</issn><isbn>9798350322637</isbn><isbn>9798350322637</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkUtLw0AUhccXWGr_gYus3KXeeSSTWbgoodViQdC6HibJJA41D2cSSv-9EyuCLl1dzj3nXLh8CN1gmGMM4nadvizDtK071Zi2iZI4SeYECJ0DAI9O0ExwkdAIKCEx5adoQiLOQiwoO_vjnaMJEA5h5BOXaOacySDCgmAKfIIet-1e2cIFqgkW6zDVTW9NHjzrj8FYXXvpgmVTmUZra5oqWFlV631rd0HZ2mBrB9d71b8dfPsKXZTq3enZ95yi19Vymz6Em6f7dbrYhIoy1odYKUZYAQkjeaYjgokiZUZJEmNFcgHC_1poxhXkJAFWqKTkDFMRxVkGnFA6ReHxrtvrbshkZ02t7EG2yshq6KRfVYN0WlJKBeM-f33MG631TxoD5v7-aN8dbZXXMmvbnfOeHCnIkYL8TUGOFOQXBZlZo0vf5__r009kqYr_</recordid><startdate>20230514</startdate><enddate>20230514</enddate><creator>Ronanki, Krishna</creator><general>IEEE Press</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>BNKNJ</scope><scope>F1U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230514</creationdate><title>Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI</title><author>Ronanki, Krishna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-1aa424d0842cbe5212a2fb32861a2c909688de47a0c2804da8f7413956bb07233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>AI co-worker</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Ethical AI</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>EU AI Act</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Human-centered computing</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Programvaruteknik</topic><topic>Requirements Engineering</topic><topic>Social and professional topics</topic><topic>Social and professional topics -- Computing -- technology policy</topic><topic>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics</topic><topic>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession</topic><topic>Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession -- Codes of ethics</topic><topic>Software and its engineering</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software -- Requirements analysis</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software development process management</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools</topic><topic>Software Engineering</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Trustworthy AI</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronanki, Krishna</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Conference</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronanki, Krishna</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI</atitle><btitle>2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion)</btitle><stitle>ICSE-COMPANION</stitle><date>2023-05-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>278</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>278-280</pages><issn>0270-5257</issn><eissn>2574-1934</eissn><isbn>9798350322637</isbn><eisbn>9798350322637</eisbn><coden>IEEPAD</coden><abstract>Ethical guidelines are an asset for artificial intelligence(AI) development and conforming to them will soon be a procedural requirement once the EU AI Act gets ratified in the European parliament. However, developers often lack explicit knowledge on how to apply these guidelines during the system development process. A literature review of different ethical guidelines from various countries and organizations has revealed inconsistencies in the principles presented and the terminology used to describe such principles. This research begins by identifying the limitations of existing ethical AI development frameworks in performing requirements engineering(RE) processes during the development of trustworthy AI. Recommendations to address those limitations will be proposed to make the frameworks more applicable in the RE process to foster the development of trustworthy AI. This could lead to wider adoption, greater productivity of the AI systems, and reduced workload on humans for non-cognitive tasks. Considering the impact of some of the newer foundation models like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, the vision for this research project is to work towards the development of holistic operationalisable RE guidelines for the development and implementation of trustworthy AI not only on a product level but also on process level.</abstract><cop>Piscataway, NJ, USA</cop><pub>IEEE Press</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00075</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0270-5257
ispartof 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion), 2023, p.278-280
issn 0270-5257
2574-1934
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10172807
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects AI co-worker
Artificial intelligence
Ethical AI
Ethics
EU AI Act
Frameworks
Guidelines
Human-centered computing
Organizations
Productivity
Programvaruteknik
Requirements Engineering
Social and professional topics
Social and professional topics -- Computing -- technology policy
Social and professional topics -- Professional topics
Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession
Social and professional topics -- Professional topics -- Computing profession -- Codes of ethics
Software and its engineering
Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management
Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software
Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Designing software -- Requirements analysis
Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software development process management
Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools
Software Engineering
Task analysis
Terminology
Trustworthy AI
title Towards an AI-Centric Requirements Engineering Framework for Trustworthy AI
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A36%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Towards%20an%20AI-Centric%20Requirements%20Engineering%20Framework%20for%20Trustworthy%20AI&rft.btitle=2023%20IEEE/ACM%2045th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering:%20Companion%20Proceedings%20(ICSE-Companion)&rft.au=Ronanki,%20Krishna&rft.date=2023-05-14&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=278-280&rft.issn=0270-5257&rft.eissn=2574-1934&rft.isbn=9798350322637&rft.coden=IEEPAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSE-Companion58688.2023.00075&rft.eisbn=9798350322637&rft_dat=%3Cswepub_CHZPO%3Eoai_gup_ub_gu_se_333947%3C/swepub_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-1aa424d0842cbe5212a2fb32861a2c909688de47a0c2804da8f7413956bb07233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10172807&rfr_iscdi=true