Loading…

A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation

Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coeffic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of oceanic engineering 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9
Main Authors: Blanford, Thomas E., Brown, Daniel C., Meyer, Richard J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763
container_end_page 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE journal of oceanic engineering
container_volume 48
creator Blanford, Thomas E.
Brown, Daniel C.
Meyer, Richard J.
description Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10229990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10229990</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2876677033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiYjePXho4nmxX9t2jkjwKxAO4Lkpu60sge3aLjH-e0vg4GkmmfeZmTwI3VMyopTA08diOmKE8RFnoBiDCzSgZakLKoFeogHhUhRASrhGNyltCaFCKBig1RhPwr6zsUmhxcHj1U_Ac9dvQp2wDxEvm_1hZ_um_cLLLle7y8DGRddWrni2ydV4Hvomw9PUN3t7bG_Rlbe75O7OdYg-X6aryVsxW7y-T8azomKi7AtFeW2hXDPrpfZCU1qpNeWaq1qVWgpLK1kzW62dUiUDAsJKqLUHBVxZJfkQPZ72djF8H1zqzTYcYptPGqaVlEoRznOKnFJVDClF500X86Px11Biju5MdmeO7szZXUYeTkjjnPsXzzMAwv8AzF1pdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876677033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOEDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Along-track motion estimation ; Arrays ; Coefficients ; Coherent scattering ; Computational modeling ; Computer simulation ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; correlation velocity log ; Covariance matrices ; Covariance matrix ; Mathematical models ; micronavigation ; Motion simulation ; Movement ; Navigation ; Ocean floor ; Probability density functions ; Probability theory ; Receivers ; Scattering ; Simulation ; Sonar ; Sonar arrays ; Spatial coherence ; Synthetic apertures ; Synthetic data ; Time series</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6672-1562 ; 0000-0001-7372-506X ; 0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10229990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><title>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</title><addtitle>JOE</addtitle><description>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Along-track motion estimation</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Coherent scattering</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>correlation velocity log</subject><subject>Covariance matrices</subject><subject>Covariance matrix</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>micronavigation</subject><subject>Motion simulation</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sonar</subject><subject>Sonar arrays</subject><subject>Spatial coherence</subject><subject>Synthetic apertures</subject><subject>Synthetic data</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0364-9059</issn><issn>1558-1691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiYjePXho4nmxX9t2jkjwKxAO4Lkpu60sge3aLjH-e0vg4GkmmfeZmTwI3VMyopTA08diOmKE8RFnoBiDCzSgZakLKoFeogHhUhRASrhGNyltCaFCKBig1RhPwr6zsUmhxcHj1U_Ac9dvQp2wDxEvm_1hZ_um_cLLLle7y8DGRddWrni2ydV4Hvomw9PUN3t7bG_Rlbe75O7OdYg-X6aryVsxW7y-T8azomKi7AtFeW2hXDPrpfZCU1qpNeWaq1qVWgpLK1kzW62dUiUDAsJKqLUHBVxZJfkQPZ72djF8H1zqzTYcYptPGqaVlEoRznOKnFJVDClF500X86Px11Biju5MdmeO7szZXUYeTkjjnPsXzzMAwv8AzF1pdg</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Blanford, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Brown, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Meyer, Richard J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-506X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><author>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Along-track motion estimation</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Coherent scattering</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>correlation velocity log</topic><topic>Covariance matrices</topic><topic>Covariance matrix</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>micronavigation</topic><topic>Motion simulation</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sonar</topic><topic>Sonar arrays</topic><topic>Spatial coherence</topic><topic>Synthetic apertures</topic><topic>Synthetic data</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blanford, Thomas E.</au><au>Brown, Daniel C.</au><au>Meyer, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle><stitle>JOE</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0364-9059</issn><eissn>1558-1691</eissn><coden>IJOEDY</coden><abstract>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-506X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-9059
ispartof IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9
issn 0364-9059
1558-1691
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10229990
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Algorithms
Along-track motion estimation
Arrays
Coefficients
Coherent scattering
Computational modeling
Computer simulation
Correlation
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
correlation velocity log
Covariance matrices
Covariance matrix
Mathematical models
micronavigation
Motion simulation
Movement
Navigation
Ocean floor
Probability density functions
Probability theory
Receivers
Scattering
Simulation
Sonar
Sonar arrays
Spatial coherence
Synthetic apertures
Synthetic data
Time series
title A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Methods%20for%20Simulating%20Spatial%20Coherence-Based%20Motion%20Estimation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20oceanic%20engineering&rft.au=Blanford,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0364-9059&rft.eissn=1558-1691&rft.coden=IJOEDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2876677033%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876677033&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10229990&rfr_iscdi=true