Loading…
A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation
Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coeffic...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Blanford, Thomas E. Brown, Daniel C. Meyer, Richard J. |
description | Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10229990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10229990</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2876677033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiYjePXho4nmxX9t2jkjwKxAO4Lkpu60sge3aLjH-e0vg4GkmmfeZmTwI3VMyopTA08diOmKE8RFnoBiDCzSgZakLKoFeogHhUhRASrhGNyltCaFCKBig1RhPwr6zsUmhxcHj1U_Ac9dvQp2wDxEvm_1hZ_um_cLLLle7y8DGRddWrni2ydV4Hvomw9PUN3t7bG_Rlbe75O7OdYg-X6aryVsxW7y-T8azomKi7AtFeW2hXDPrpfZCU1qpNeWaq1qVWgpLK1kzW62dUiUDAsJKqLUHBVxZJfkQPZ72djF8H1zqzTYcYptPGqaVlEoRznOKnFJVDClF500X86Px11Biju5MdmeO7szZXUYeTkjjnPsXzzMAwv8AzF1pdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876677033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOEDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Along-track motion estimation ; Arrays ; Coefficients ; Coherent scattering ; Computational modeling ; Computer simulation ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; correlation velocity log ; Covariance matrices ; Covariance matrix ; Mathematical models ; micronavigation ; Motion simulation ; Movement ; Navigation ; Ocean floor ; Probability density functions ; Probability theory ; Receivers ; Scattering ; Simulation ; Sonar ; Sonar arrays ; Spatial coherence ; Synthetic apertures ; Synthetic data ; Time series</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6672-1562 ; 0000-0001-7372-506X ; 0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10229990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><title>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</title><addtitle>JOE</addtitle><description>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Along-track motion estimation</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Coherent scattering</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>correlation velocity log</subject><subject>Covariance matrices</subject><subject>Covariance matrix</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>micronavigation</subject><subject>Motion simulation</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sonar</subject><subject>Sonar arrays</subject><subject>Spatial coherence</subject><subject>Synthetic apertures</subject><subject>Synthetic data</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0364-9059</issn><issn>1558-1691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiYjePXho4nmxX9t2jkjwKxAO4Lkpu60sge3aLjH-e0vg4GkmmfeZmTwI3VMyopTA08diOmKE8RFnoBiDCzSgZakLKoFeogHhUhRASrhGNyltCaFCKBig1RhPwr6zsUmhxcHj1U_Ac9dvQp2wDxEvm_1hZ_um_cLLLle7y8DGRddWrni2ydV4Hvomw9PUN3t7bG_Rlbe75O7OdYg-X6aryVsxW7y-T8azomKi7AtFeW2hXDPrpfZCU1qpNeWaq1qVWgpLK1kzW62dUiUDAsJKqLUHBVxZJfkQPZ72djF8H1zqzTYcYptPGqaVlEoRznOKnFJVDClF500X86Px11Biju5MdmeO7szZXUYeTkjjnPsXzzMAwv8AzF1pdg</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Blanford, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Brown, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Meyer, Richard J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-506X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</title><author>Blanford, Thomas E. ; Brown, Daniel C. ; Meyer, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Along-track motion estimation</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Coherent scattering</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>correlation velocity log</topic><topic>Covariance matrices</topic><topic>Covariance matrix</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>micronavigation</topic><topic>Motion simulation</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sonar</topic><topic>Sonar arrays</topic><topic>Spatial coherence</topic><topic>Synthetic apertures</topic><topic>Synthetic data</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blanford, Thomas E.</au><au>Brown, Daniel C.</au><au>Meyer, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of oceanic engineering</jtitle><stitle>JOE</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0364-9059</issn><eissn>1558-1691</eissn><coden>IJOEDY</coden><abstract>Sonar systems, such as correlation velocity logs and synthetic aperture sonars, may exploit the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering for navigation. Motion estimation algorithms find the ping-to-ping displacement within the plane of an array using the magnitude of the complex correlation coefficient as an estimator of spatial coherence. Simulation of these systems requires large amounts of spatially coherent data. Therefore, methods used to simulate spatially coherent data for evaluating these algorithms should accurately describe the probability density function of the spatial coherence estimator. Several methods have been proposed for modeling and simulation of the spatial coherence of seafloor scattering. One method uses discretized time series models, such as point or facet-based models, to describe the seafloor as an ensemble of scattering elements and generate synthetic data in the time domain. The simulated time series data is used to compute the sample correlation coefficients required by the motion estimation algorithms. Such models, however, are often computationally burdensome. An alternative method directly simulates the sample covariance using Monte Carlo draws from a complex Wishart distribution. Sample correlation coefficients are computed from the random covariance matrices. The two types of methods are compared for the simulation of 200 kHz sonar array oriented at normal incidence to the seafloor. The simulated data are shown to be equivalent for the purposes of motion estimation. There are significant computational advantages, however, to using the complex Wishart-based Monte Carlo approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-1562</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-506X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6139-8894</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-9059 |
ispartof | IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 2023-10, Vol.48 (4), p.1-9 |
issn | 0364-9059 1558-1691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10229990 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Algorithms Along-track motion estimation Arrays Coefficients Coherent scattering Computational modeling Computer simulation Correlation Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients correlation velocity log Covariance matrices Covariance matrix Mathematical models micronavigation Motion simulation Movement Navigation Ocean floor Probability density functions Probability theory Receivers Scattering Simulation Sonar Sonar arrays Spatial coherence Synthetic apertures Synthetic data Time series |
title | A Comparison of Two Methods for Simulating Spatial Coherence-Based Motion Estimation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Methods%20for%20Simulating%20Spatial%20Coherence-Based%20Motion%20Estimation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20oceanic%20engineering&rft.au=Blanford,%20Thomas%20E.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0364-9059&rft.eissn=1558-1691&rft.coden=IJOEDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JOE.2023.3297229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2876677033%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-713da95b2af68f4811c7b13837d75864a1c6d2acbe77529094a69d8f97937a763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876677033&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10229990&rfr_iscdi=true |