Loading…
Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving
The development of autonomous driving (AD) algorithms and their testing would be very expensive when real-world vehicles and environments would be used from the very beginning of development. That is why in the initial development phases simulators are often used, in which it is possible to achieve...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 7 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Dumancic, David Mijic, David Vranjes, Mario Grbic, Ratko |
description | The development of autonomous driving (AD) algorithms and their testing would be very expensive when real-world vehicles and environments would be used from the very beginning of development. That is why in the initial development phases simulators are often used, in which it is possible to achieve realistic simulations of the real world. Therefore, many different simulators for AD have been developed. One of the main tasks of a fully autonomous vehicle is steering angle prediction (SAP). This paper explores SAP using a PilotNet CNN-based algorithm that recognizes essential features from input images to predict vehicle trajectory. After training on real-world images, the algorithm's performance is evaluated in both CARLA and AirSim simulators, achieving 91.65% autonomy in CARLA and 71.87% in AirSim. The algorithm is further trained on the images obtained from the simulator, resulting in improved performance of 96.34% in CARLA and 78.99% in AirSim in terms of total autonomy. The study demonstrates the benefits of simulators for the development of AD algorithms and highlights the importance of testing in multiple simulators to achieve reliable performance across different environments and scenarios, including different lighting and weather conditions, types of road markings, and track configurations. The paper also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of individual simulators, which can be useful for the development and testing of future SAP algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.23919/SoftCOM58365.2023.10271635 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10271635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10271635</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10271635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i119t-bb61aa898193073e273d25d2e0a991319b66005ac74e5bab307bd0ee46431a7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10F9LwzAUBfAgCI65b-BDwOfOJLdpm8fS-Q8mG0zBt5G2t_VKm4w0E_z2FtSn8_LjHDiM3UqxVmCkuTv4Lla7F11AptdKKFhLoXKZgb5gC1mkeQK6eL9iq2n6FEKAEpAas2B0iIiBXM9L1w_I9wFbaiJ5x8uh94Hix8j3GDofRusa5JUfTzbQNANyfENdhwFd5Acaz4ONPkx8trw8R-_86M8T3wT6mgeu2WVnhwlXf7lkbw_3r9VTst09PlflNiEpTUzqOpPWFqaQBkQOqHJolW4VCmuMBGnqLBNC2yZPUde2nlHdCsQ0S0Ha3MKS3fz2EiIeT4FGG76P_2_AD4tEWeY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Dumancic, David ; Mijic, David ; Vranjes, Mario ; Grbic, Ratko</creator><creatorcontrib>Dumancic, David ; Mijic, David ; Vranjes, Mario ; Grbic, Ratko</creatorcontrib><description>The development of autonomous driving (AD) algorithms and their testing would be very expensive when real-world vehicles and environments would be used from the very beginning of development. That is why in the initial development phases simulators are often used, in which it is possible to achieve realistic simulations of the real world. Therefore, many different simulators for AD have been developed. One of the main tasks of a fully autonomous vehicle is steering angle prediction (SAP). This paper explores SAP using a PilotNet CNN-based algorithm that recognizes essential features from input images to predict vehicle trajectory. After training on real-world images, the algorithm's performance is evaluated in both CARLA and AirSim simulators, achieving 91.65% autonomy in CARLA and 71.87% in AirSim. The algorithm is further trained on the images obtained from the simulator, resulting in improved performance of 96.34% in CARLA and 78.99% in AirSim in terms of total autonomy. The study demonstrates the benefits of simulators for the development of AD algorithms and highlights the importance of testing in multiple simulators to achieve reliable performance across different environments and scenarios, including different lighting and weather conditions, types of road markings, and track configurations. The paper also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of individual simulators, which can be useful for the development and testing of future SAP algorithms.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1847-358X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23919/SoftCOM58365.2023.10271635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Split, FESB</publisher><subject>AirSim ; Atmospheric modeling ; autonomous driving ; CARLA ; neural network ; Prediction algorithms ; simulator ; Software algorithms ; steering angle prediction ; Telecommunications ; Training ; Trajectory ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 2023, p.1-7</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10271635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10271635$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dumancic, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijic, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranjes, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grbic, Ratko</creatorcontrib><title>Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving</title><title>2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)</title><addtitle>SoftCOM</addtitle><description>The development of autonomous driving (AD) algorithms and their testing would be very expensive when real-world vehicles and environments would be used from the very beginning of development. That is why in the initial development phases simulators are often used, in which it is possible to achieve realistic simulations of the real world. Therefore, many different simulators for AD have been developed. One of the main tasks of a fully autonomous vehicle is steering angle prediction (SAP). This paper explores SAP using a PilotNet CNN-based algorithm that recognizes essential features from input images to predict vehicle trajectory. After training on real-world images, the algorithm's performance is evaluated in both CARLA and AirSim simulators, achieving 91.65% autonomy in CARLA and 71.87% in AirSim. The algorithm is further trained on the images obtained from the simulator, resulting in improved performance of 96.34% in CARLA and 78.99% in AirSim in terms of total autonomy. The study demonstrates the benefits of simulators for the development of AD algorithms and highlights the importance of testing in multiple simulators to achieve reliable performance across different environments and scenarios, including different lighting and weather conditions, types of road markings, and track configurations. The paper also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of individual simulators, which can be useful for the development and testing of future SAP algorithms.</description><subject>AirSim</subject><subject>Atmospheric modeling</subject><subject>autonomous driving</subject><subject>CARLA</subject><subject>neural network</subject><subject>Prediction algorithms</subject><subject>simulator</subject><subject>Software algorithms</subject><subject>steering angle prediction</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Trajectory</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1847-358X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo10F9LwzAUBfAgCI65b-BDwOfOJLdpm8fS-Q8mG0zBt5G2t_VKm4w0E_z2FtSn8_LjHDiM3UqxVmCkuTv4Lla7F11AptdKKFhLoXKZgb5gC1mkeQK6eL9iq2n6FEKAEpAas2B0iIiBXM9L1w_I9wFbaiJ5x8uh94Hix8j3GDofRusa5JUfTzbQNANyfENdhwFd5Acaz4ONPkx8trw8R-_86M8T3wT6mgeu2WVnhwlXf7lkbw_3r9VTst09PlflNiEpTUzqOpPWFqaQBkQOqHJolW4VCmuMBGnqLBNC2yZPUde2nlHdCsQ0S0Ha3MKS3fz2EiIeT4FGG76P_2_AD4tEWeY</recordid><startdate>20230921</startdate><enddate>20230921</enddate><creator>Dumancic, David</creator><creator>Mijic, David</creator><creator>Vranjes, Mario</creator><creator>Grbic, Ratko</creator><general>University of Split, FESB</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230921</creationdate><title>Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving</title><author>Dumancic, David ; Mijic, David ; Vranjes, Mario ; Grbic, Ratko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i119t-bb61aa898193073e273d25d2e0a991319b66005ac74e5bab307bd0ee46431a7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>AirSim</topic><topic>Atmospheric modeling</topic><topic>autonomous driving</topic><topic>CARLA</topic><topic>neural network</topic><topic>Prediction algorithms</topic><topic>simulator</topic><topic>Software algorithms</topic><topic>steering angle prediction</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Trajectory</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dumancic, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijic, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vranjes, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grbic, Ratko</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEL</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dumancic, David</au><au>Mijic, David</au><au>Vranjes, Mario</au><au>Grbic, Ratko</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving</atitle><btitle>2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)</btitle><stitle>SoftCOM</stitle><date>2023-09-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><eissn>1847-358X</eissn><abstract>The development of autonomous driving (AD) algorithms and their testing would be very expensive when real-world vehicles and environments would be used from the very beginning of development. That is why in the initial development phases simulators are often used, in which it is possible to achieve realistic simulations of the real world. Therefore, many different simulators for AD have been developed. One of the main tasks of a fully autonomous vehicle is steering angle prediction (SAP). This paper explores SAP using a PilotNet CNN-based algorithm that recognizes essential features from input images to predict vehicle trajectory. After training on real-world images, the algorithm's performance is evaluated in both CARLA and AirSim simulators, achieving 91.65% autonomy in CARLA and 71.87% in AirSim. The algorithm is further trained on the images obtained from the simulator, resulting in improved performance of 96.34% in CARLA and 78.99% in AirSim in terms of total autonomy. The study demonstrates the benefits of simulators for the development of AD algorithms and highlights the importance of testing in multiple simulators to achieve reliable performance across different environments and scenarios, including different lighting and weather conditions, types of road markings, and track configurations. The paper also highlights the advantages and disadvantages of individual simulators, which can be useful for the development and testing of future SAP algorithms.</abstract><pub>University of Split, FESB</pub><doi>10.23919/SoftCOM58365.2023.10271635</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | EISSN: 1847-358X |
ispartof | 2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 2023, p.1-7 |
issn | 1847-358X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10271635 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | AirSim Atmospheric modeling autonomous driving CARLA neural network Prediction algorithms simulator Software algorithms steering angle prediction Telecommunications Training Trajectory Visualization |
title | Steering Angle Prediction Algorithm Performance Comparison in Different Simulators for Autonomous Driving |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A46%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Steering%20Angle%20Prediction%20Algorithm%20Performance%20Comparison%20in%20Different%20Simulators%20for%20Autonomous%20Driving&rft.btitle=2023%20International%20Conference%20on%20Software,%20Telecommunications%20and%20Computer%20Networks%20(SoftCOM)&rft.au=Dumancic,%20David&rft.date=2023-09-21&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.eissn=1847-358X&rft_id=info:doi/10.23919/SoftCOM58365.2023.10271635&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E10271635%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i119t-bb61aa898193073e273d25d2e0a991319b66005ac74e5bab307bd0ee46431a7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10271635&rfr_iscdi=true |