Validation procedures for EMC Test Sites in the frequency range 1 to 18 GHz in view of extension to the frequency range 18 to 40 GHz

This paper shows a comparison of two methods for the Site VSWR measurement for anechoic room validation. The CISPR method based on CISPR 16-1-4 is compared with the ANSI C63.25.1 method. Differences will be analyzed and necessary technical concretizations in the standard are explained. This is impor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Battermann, Sven, Riedelsheimer, Jochen, Metzger, Markus, Trautnitz, Friedrich-Wilhelm
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
ANSI C63.25.1
Chamber Validation
CISPR 16-1-4
Electromagnetic compatibility
Europe
Site Validation
Site VSWR
Solids
TD VSWR
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper shows a comparison of two methods for the Site VSWR measurement for anechoic room validation. The CISPR method based on CISPR 16-1-4 is compared with the ANSI C63.25.1 method. Differences will be analyzed and necessary technical concretizations in the standard are explained. This is important to provide a technically solid base for the anechoic room validation for continuously increasing frequencies above 18 GHz.
ISSN:2325-0364
DOI:10.1109/EMCEurope57790.2023.10274180