Loading…

Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs

Online parameter estimation algorithms of electrical motors are widely employed to achieve robust and high-performance control as well as condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. This article proposes an error analysis to compare the performance of four different online estimation methods of the st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics 2024-10, Vol.12 (5), p.4941-4955
Main Authors: Brescia, Elia, Pio Savastio, Luigi, Di Nardo, Mauro, Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe, Cupertino, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-ef04988d635e63ef4d677ef45f4867dee3f0a62085aa7ee541c18c132f6cb4263
container_end_page 4955
container_issue 5
container_start_page 4941
container_title IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics
container_volume 12
creator Brescia, Elia
Pio Savastio, Luigi
Di Nardo, Mauro
Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe
Cupertino, Francesco
description Online parameter estimation algorithms of electrical motors are widely employed to achieve robust and high-performance control as well as condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. This article proposes an error analysis to compare the performance of four different online estimation methods of the stator resistance and rotor flux linkage in nonsalient permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). Starting from the dq-axis steady-state model of the PMSM, including the voltage source inverter (VSI) nonlinearity and the presence of measurement errors, a formulation of the estimation errors is outlined. A probabilistic analysis is then proposed to determine the expected values and the percentile ranges of the estimation errors on the basis of the previously introduced formulations. The theoretical predictions have been verified with an extensive experimental test campaign carried out on an instrumented test rig in multiple operating conditions (OCs) of two different motors. The experimentally validated results show that the considered parameter estimation methods exhibit different performances depending on the motor speed and torque levels. No parameter estimation technique performs notably better than any other under all OCs. As a consequence, the proposed analysis constitutes a useful tool to select the most appropriate estimation method.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3453949
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10663551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10663551</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3112224007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-ef04988d635e63ef4d677ef45f4867dee3f0a62085aa7ee541c18c132f6cb4263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1PwzAMjRBITLBfAIdInDvy1TQ9TlPHhzZt2saFSxRSBzpGO5JUYv-eVpsQvjzL9rOfH0I3lIwoJfn9c7HeLIsRI0yMuEh5LvIzNGBUqkRmKj3_y7PsEg1D2JIuFEvzTA3Q69ja1ht7wI3Di3pX1YCLEKsvE6umxnOIH00Z-uY6mth4vIJQhWhqC9jUJV41fXG6a3_wrKo_zTvgqsbL-XoertGFM7sAwxNeoZdpsZk8JrPFw9NkPEssYzwm4IjIlSolT0FycKLslHaQOqFkVgJwR4xkRKXGZACpoJYqSzlz0r4JJvkVujvu3fvmu4UQ9bZpfd2d1JxSxpggJOum-HHK-iYED07vffelP2hKdO-jPvqoex_1yceOdXtkVQDwjyE7tSnlv3pgbkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112224007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Brescia, Elia ; Pio Savastio, Luigi ; Di Nardo, Mauro ; Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe ; Cupertino, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Brescia, Elia ; Pio Savastio, Luigi ; Di Nardo, Mauro ; Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe ; Cupertino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Online parameter estimation algorithms of electrical motors are widely employed to achieve robust and high-performance control as well as condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. This article proposes an error analysis to compare the performance of four different online estimation methods of the stator resistance and rotor flux linkage in nonsalient permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). Starting from the dq-axis steady-state model of the PMSM, including the voltage source inverter (VSI) nonlinearity and the presence of measurement errors, a formulation of the estimation errors is outlined. A probabilistic analysis is then proposed to determine the expected values and the percentile ranges of the estimation errors on the basis of the previously introduced formulations. The theoretical predictions have been verified with an extensive experimental test campaign carried out on an instrumented test rig in multiple operating conditions (OCs) of two different motors. The experimentally validated results show that the considered parameter estimation methods exhibit different performances depending on the motor speed and torque levels. No parameter estimation technique performs notably better than any other under all OCs. As a consequence, the proposed analysis constitutes a useful tool to select the most appropriate estimation method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3453949</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJESN2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Condition monitoring ; Couplings ; Error analysis ; Estimation error ; Fault diagnosis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Motors ; online parameter estimation ; Parameter estimation ; Parameter robustness ; permanent magnet ; Permanent magnets ; Probabilistic analysis ; rank deficiency ; Resistance ; Robust control ; Rotors ; Stators ; Steady state models ; synchronous machines ; Synchronous motors</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics, 2024-10, Vol.12 (5), p.4941-4955</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-ef04988d635e63ef4d677ef45f4867dee3f0a62085aa7ee541c18c132f6cb4263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1471-9799 ; 0000-0002-3179-4427 ; 0000-0003-0137-4920 ; 0009-0003-3837-9212 ; 0000-0003-4135-4756</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10663551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brescia, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pio Savastio, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nardo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cupertino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs</title><title>IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics</title><addtitle>JESTPE</addtitle><description>Online parameter estimation algorithms of electrical motors are widely employed to achieve robust and high-performance control as well as condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. This article proposes an error analysis to compare the performance of four different online estimation methods of the stator resistance and rotor flux linkage in nonsalient permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). Starting from the dq-axis steady-state model of the PMSM, including the voltage source inverter (VSI) nonlinearity and the presence of measurement errors, a formulation of the estimation errors is outlined. A probabilistic analysis is then proposed to determine the expected values and the percentile ranges of the estimation errors on the basis of the previously introduced formulations. The theoretical predictions have been verified with an extensive experimental test campaign carried out on an instrumented test rig in multiple operating conditions (OCs) of two different motors. The experimentally validated results show that the considered parameter estimation methods exhibit different performances depending on the motor speed and torque levels. No parameter estimation technique performs notably better than any other under all OCs. As a consequence, the proposed analysis constitutes a useful tool to select the most appropriate estimation method.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Condition monitoring</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Estimation error</subject><subject>Fault diagnosis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>online parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parameter robustness</subject><subject>permanent magnet</subject><subject>Permanent magnets</subject><subject>Probabilistic analysis</subject><subject>rank deficiency</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Rotors</subject><subject>Stators</subject><subject>Steady state models</subject><subject>synchronous machines</subject><subject>Synchronous motors</subject><issn>2168-6777</issn><issn>2168-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1PwzAMjRBITLBfAIdInDvy1TQ9TlPHhzZt2saFSxRSBzpGO5JUYv-eVpsQvjzL9rOfH0I3lIwoJfn9c7HeLIsRI0yMuEh5LvIzNGBUqkRmKj3_y7PsEg1D2JIuFEvzTA3Q69ja1ht7wI3Di3pX1YCLEKsvE6umxnOIH00Z-uY6mth4vIJQhWhqC9jUJV41fXG6a3_wrKo_zTvgqsbL-XoertGFM7sAwxNeoZdpsZk8JrPFw9NkPEssYzwm4IjIlSolT0FycKLslHaQOqFkVgJwR4xkRKXGZACpoJYqSzlz0r4JJvkVujvu3fvmu4UQ9bZpfd2d1JxSxpggJOum-HHK-iYED07vffelP2hKdO-jPvqoex_1yceOdXtkVQDwjyE7tSnlv3pgbkw</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Brescia, Elia</creator><creator>Pio Savastio, Luigi</creator><creator>Di Nardo, Mauro</creator><creator>Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Cupertino, Francesco</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-4427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-4920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3837-9212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-4756</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs</title><author>Brescia, Elia ; Pio Savastio, Luigi ; Di Nardo, Mauro ; Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe ; Cupertino, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-ef04988d635e63ef4d677ef45f4867dee3f0a62085aa7ee541c18c132f6cb4263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Condition monitoring</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Estimation error</topic><topic>Fault diagnosis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>online parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parameter robustness</topic><topic>permanent magnet</topic><topic>Permanent magnets</topic><topic>Probabilistic analysis</topic><topic>rank deficiency</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Rotors</topic><topic>Stators</topic><topic>Steady state models</topic><topic>synchronous machines</topic><topic>Synchronous motors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brescia, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pio Savastio, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Nardo, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cupertino, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Explore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brescia, Elia</au><au>Pio Savastio, Luigi</au><au>Di Nardo, Mauro</au><au>Leonardo Cascella, Giuseppe</au><au>Cupertino, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics</jtitle><stitle>JESTPE</stitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>4941</spage><epage>4955</epage><pages>4941-4955</pages><issn>2168-6777</issn><eissn>2168-6785</eissn><coden>IJESN2</coden><abstract>Online parameter estimation algorithms of electrical motors are widely employed to achieve robust and high-performance control as well as condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. This article proposes an error analysis to compare the performance of four different online estimation methods of the stator resistance and rotor flux linkage in nonsalient permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs). Starting from the dq-axis steady-state model of the PMSM, including the voltage source inverter (VSI) nonlinearity and the presence of measurement errors, a formulation of the estimation errors is outlined. A probabilistic analysis is then proposed to determine the expected values and the percentile ranges of the estimation errors on the basis of the previously introduced formulations. The theoretical predictions have been verified with an extensive experimental test campaign carried out on an instrumented test rig in multiple operating conditions (OCs) of two different motors. The experimentally validated results show that the considered parameter estimation methods exhibit different performances depending on the motor speed and torque levels. No parameter estimation technique performs notably better than any other under all OCs. As a consequence, the proposed analysis constitutes a useful tool to select the most appropriate estimation method.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3453949</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-4427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-4920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3837-9212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-4756</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6777
ispartof IEEE journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics, 2024-10, Vol.12 (5), p.4941-4955
issn 2168-6777
2168-6785
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10663551
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Algorithms
Condition monitoring
Couplings
Error analysis
Estimation error
Fault diagnosis
Monte Carlo simulation
Motors
online parameter estimation
Parameter estimation
Parameter robustness
permanent magnet
Permanent magnets
Probabilistic analysis
rank deficiency
Resistance
Robust control
Rotors
Stators
Steady state models
synchronous machines
Synchronous motors
title Accuracy of Online Estimation Methods of Stator Resistance and Rotor Flux Linkage in PMSMs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Online%20Estimation%20Methods%20of%20Stator%20Resistance%20and%20Rotor%20Flux%20Linkage%20in%20PMSMs&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20emerging%20and%20selected%20topics%20in%20power%20electronics&rft.au=Brescia,%20Elia&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=4941&rft.epage=4955&rft.pages=4941-4955&rft.issn=2168-6777&rft.eissn=2168-6785&rft.coden=IJESN2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JESTPE.2024.3453949&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E3112224007%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-ef04988d635e63ef4d677ef45f4867dee3f0a62085aa7ee541c18c132f6cb4263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112224007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10663551&rfr_iscdi=true