Loading…
A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques play a pivotal role in optimizing the energy harvesting efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems. Among the various MPPT algorithms, Perturb and Observe (P&O) and fuzzy logic control have emerged as prominent contenders due to their simplicity and ef...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 948 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 944 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Vora, Kunal Liu, Shichao Dhulipati, Himavarsha |
description | Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques play a pivotal role in optimizing the energy harvesting efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems. Among the various MPPT algorithms, Perturb and Observe (P&O) and fuzzy logic control have emerged as prominent contenders due to their simplicity and effectiveness. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these two methods for MPPT in PV systems. The study employs simulation-based experimentation to evaluate the performance of P&O and fuzzy logic algorithms under varying irradiance level conditions. Efficiency, response time, settling time and stability are among the key performance metrics considered for comparison. Results indicate that while both P&O and fuzzy logic approaches exhibit commendable MPPT performance, they demonstrate distinct advantages and limitations. P&O exhibits rapid convergence to the maximum power point but suffers from oscillations around the optimal operating point. On the other hand, fuzzy logic control offers enhanced stability and robustness against step changes in irradiance levels but may require more computational resources. Simulations of the proposed system are performed in MATLAB Simulink environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/CCECE59415.2024.10667195 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10667195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10667195</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10667195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i106t-2c1e65dad6412977bfcda55b7c57f453569e24e1fc9501dc7b7a1cf7c00dafb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrCYmIvIGHr4XANvd_tAj2YCaQCQRz6TbbaG6uyVtQZcH8Lldo15mJpnMJDMIAcETQrC8L4p5MWeSEjbJcEYnBHMuiGQXaCSFnOYM54LwbHqJBhkTfCww5dfoJsY3jDGdcjpAXzMofHNQQSV3MjBrVd1FF8FbWJuQjqEE1VbwXEYTev9HL47ncwdLv3O6z7Yp-BpWJu19FcH6ACv16ZpjA2v_YUKPrk2wCUq_u3YHroX13id_8nVSfcFLF5Np4i26sqqOZvTHQ_S6mG-Kx_Hy-eGpmC3Hrt-WxpkmhrNKVZySTApRWl0pxkqhmbCU5YxLk1FDrJYMk0qLUiiirdAYV8qWIh-iu99eZ4zZHoJrVOi2_7_l30ROZXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Vora, Kunal ; Liu, Shichao ; Dhulipati, Himavarsha</creator><creatorcontrib>Vora, Kunal ; Liu, Shichao ; Dhulipati, Himavarsha</creatorcontrib><description>Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques play a pivotal role in optimizing the energy harvesting efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems. Among the various MPPT algorithms, Perturb and Observe (P&O) and fuzzy logic control have emerged as prominent contenders due to their simplicity and effectiveness. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these two methods for MPPT in PV systems. The study employs simulation-based experimentation to evaluate the performance of P&O and fuzzy logic algorithms under varying irradiance level conditions. Efficiency, response time, settling time and stability are among the key performance metrics considered for comparison. Results indicate that while both P&O and fuzzy logic approaches exhibit commendable MPPT performance, they demonstrate distinct advantages and limitations. P&O exhibits rapid convergence to the maximum power point but suffers from oscillations around the optimal operating point. On the other hand, fuzzy logic control offers enhanced stability and robustness against step changes in irradiance levels but may require more computational resources. Simulations of the proposed system are performed in MATLAB Simulink environment.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2576-7046</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9798350371628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CCECE59415.2024.10667195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Convergence Time ; Efficiency ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy Logic Control ; Maximum power point trackers ; Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) ; P-V Curve ; Perturb and Observe Algorithm (P&O) ; Photovoltaic systems ; Renewable energy sources ; Response Time ; Robustness ; Software packages ; Stability ; Stability analysis ; Sustainability ; Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)</subject><ispartof>2024 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), 2024, p.944-948</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10667195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10667195$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vora, Kunal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhulipati, Himavarsha</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems</title><title>2024 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)</title><addtitle>CCECE</addtitle><description>Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques play a pivotal role in optimizing the energy harvesting efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems. Among the various MPPT algorithms, Perturb and Observe (P&O) and fuzzy logic control have emerged as prominent contenders due to their simplicity and effectiveness. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these two methods for MPPT in PV systems. The study employs simulation-based experimentation to evaluate the performance of P&O and fuzzy logic algorithms under varying irradiance level conditions. Efficiency, response time, settling time and stability are among the key performance metrics considered for comparison. Results indicate that while both P&O and fuzzy logic approaches exhibit commendable MPPT performance, they demonstrate distinct advantages and limitations. P&O exhibits rapid convergence to the maximum power point but suffers from oscillations around the optimal operating point. On the other hand, fuzzy logic control offers enhanced stability and robustness against step changes in irradiance levels but may require more computational resources. Simulations of the proposed system are performed in MATLAB Simulink environment.</description><subject>Convergence Time</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy Logic Control</subject><subject>Maximum power point trackers</subject><subject>Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)</subject><subject>P-V Curve</subject><subject>Perturb and Observe Algorithm (P&O)</subject><subject>Photovoltaic systems</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Response Time</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)</subject><issn>2576-7046</issn><isbn>9798350371628</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UM1OAjEYrCYmIvIGHr4XANvd_tAj2YCaQCQRz6TbbaG6uyVtQZcH8Lldo15mJpnMJDMIAcETQrC8L4p5MWeSEjbJcEYnBHMuiGQXaCSFnOYM54LwbHqJBhkTfCww5dfoJsY3jDGdcjpAXzMofHNQQSV3MjBrVd1FF8FbWJuQjqEE1VbwXEYTev9HL47ncwdLv3O6z7Yp-BpWJu19FcH6ACv16ZpjA2v_YUKPrk2wCUq_u3YHroX13id_8nVSfcFLF5Np4i26sqqOZvTHQ_S6mG-Kx_Hy-eGpmC3Hrt-WxpkmhrNKVZySTApRWl0pxkqhmbCU5YxLk1FDrJYMk0qLUiiirdAYV8qWIh-iu99eZ4zZHoJrVOi2_7_l30ROZXo</recordid><startdate>20240806</startdate><enddate>20240806</enddate><creator>Vora, Kunal</creator><creator>Liu, Shichao</creator><creator>Dhulipati, Himavarsha</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240806</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems</title><author>Vora, Kunal ; Liu, Shichao ; Dhulipati, Himavarsha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i106t-2c1e65dad6412977bfcda55b7c57f453569e24e1fc9501dc7b7a1cf7c00dafb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Convergence Time</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy Logic Control</topic><topic>Maximum power point trackers</topic><topic>Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)</topic><topic>P-V Curve</topic><topic>Perturb and Observe Algorithm (P&O)</topic><topic>Photovoltaic systems</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Response Time</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vora, Kunal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhulipati, Himavarsha</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vora, Kunal</au><au>Liu, Shichao</au><au>Dhulipati, Himavarsha</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems</atitle><btitle>2024 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)</btitle><stitle>CCECE</stitle><date>2024-08-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>944</spage><epage>948</epage><pages>944-948</pages><eissn>2576-7046</eissn><eisbn>9798350371628</eisbn><abstract>Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques play a pivotal role in optimizing the energy harvesting efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems. Among the various MPPT algorithms, Perturb and Observe (P&O) and fuzzy logic control have emerged as prominent contenders due to their simplicity and effectiveness. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these two methods for MPPT in PV systems. The study employs simulation-based experimentation to evaluate the performance of P&O and fuzzy logic algorithms under varying irradiance level conditions. Efficiency, response time, settling time and stability are among the key performance metrics considered for comparison. Results indicate that while both P&O and fuzzy logic approaches exhibit commendable MPPT performance, they demonstrate distinct advantages and limitations. P&O exhibits rapid convergence to the maximum power point but suffers from oscillations around the optimal operating point. On the other hand, fuzzy logic control offers enhanced stability and robustness against step changes in irradiance levels but may require more computational resources. Simulations of the proposed system are performed in MATLAB Simulink environment.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CCECE59415.2024.10667195</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | EISSN: 2576-7046 |
ispartof | 2024 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), 2024, p.944-948 |
issn | 2576-7046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10667195 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | Convergence Time Efficiency Fuzzy logic Fuzzy Logic Control Maximum power point trackers Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) P-V Curve Perturb and Observe Algorithm (P&O) Photovoltaic systems Renewable energy sources Response Time Robustness Software packages Stability Stability analysis Sustainability Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Perturb and Observe and Fuzzy Logic Control Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Perturb%20and%20Observe%20and%20Fuzzy%20Logic%20Control%20Methods%20for%20Maximum%20Power%20Point%20Tracking%20in%20Photovoltaic%20Systems&rft.btitle=2024%20IEEE%20Canadian%20Conference%20on%20Electrical%20and%20Computer%20Engineering%20(CCECE)&rft.au=Vora,%20Kunal&rft.date=2024-08-06&rft.spage=944&rft.epage=948&rft.pages=944-948&rft.eissn=2576-7046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CCECE59415.2024.10667195&rft.eisbn=9798350371628&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E10667195%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i106t-2c1e65dad6412977bfcda55b7c57f453569e24e1fc9501dc7b7a1cf7c00dafb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10667195&rfr_iscdi=true |