Application of frequency correlation function to radar target detection

Analysis of high-resolution 35 GHz synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery of terrain reveals that when point targets, such as vehicles, are viewed at angles close to grazing incidence, they are often difficult to distinguish from tree trunks because the radar cross section (RCS) intensities of the v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems 2003-01, Vol.39 (1), p.125-139
Main Authors: El-Rouby, A.E., Nashashibi, A.Y., Ulaby, F.T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Detection algorithms
Feature based
Frequency
Image analysis
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Object detection
Radar
Radar applications
Radar cross section
Radar detection
Radar imaging
Studies
Synthetic aperture radar
Trees
Trunks
Vehicles
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Analysis of high-resolution 35 GHz synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery of terrain reveals that when point targets, such as vehicles, are viewed at angles close to grazing incidence, they are often difficult to distinguish from tree trunks because the radar cross section (RCS) intensities of the vehicles are comparable to the upper end of the RCS exhibited by tree trunks. To resolve the point target/tree trunk ambiguity problem, a detailed study was conducted to evaluate the use of new detection features based on the complex frequency correlation function (FCF). This paper presents an analytical examination of FCF and its physical meaning, the results of a numerical simulation study conducted to evaluate the performance of a detection algorithm that uses FCF, and the corroboration of theory with experimental observations conducted at 35 and 95 GHz. The FCF-based detection algorithm was found to correctly identify tree trunks as such in over 90% of the cases, while exhibiting a false alarm rate of only 3%.
ISSN:0018-9251
1557-9603
DOI:10.1109/TAES.2003.1188898