Loading…

OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison

In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most impo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Horlin, F., Tubbax, J., Van der Perre, L., De Man, H.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page iv
container_issue
container_start_page iv
container_title
container_volume 4
creator Horlin, F.
Tubbax, J.
Van der Perre, L.
De Man, H.
description In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1326936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1326936</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>17610745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1LAzEUDH6AtfYX9LIXj1nfS7L58CbVqlCp0B68lbfZrES225JUwX_vSgVhmDnMMAzD2BShRAR38zy7W61eSwGgSpRCO6lP2EhI4zg6eDtlE2csDJBWWSXO2AgrAVyjchfsMucPALBG2RGTy_n9S_GVyyLH_r0L3FNKMaTbgortZ3eInPpD6Hsq_G67pxTzrr9i5y11OUz-dMzW84f17Ikvlo_DsgWPFVTca6cItdForBGVbnxbN1jLgXwTDMqWLDY1SPJOt7Lx3vgqWARCAW1dyTG7PtbuKXvq2kS9j3mzT3FL6XuDQzMY9ZubHnMxhPBvH2-RP72pU3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6149</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780384842</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780384849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2379-190X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway, N.J: IEEE</publisher><subject>Antennas ; Applied sciences ; Broadband amplifiers ; Decision feedback equalizers ; Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction ; Digital filters ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtering ; Frequency diversity ; Frequency domain analysis ; High power amplifiers ; Information, signal and communications theory ; Multiplexing ; OFDM ; Performance analysis ; Quantization ; Radiocommunications ; Signal and communications theory ; Signal, noise ; Systems, networks and services of telecommunications ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</subject><ispartof>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004, Vol.4, p.iv-iv</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1326936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,4035,4036,27904,54534,54899,54911</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1326936$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17610745$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubbax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Perre, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><title>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing</title><addtitle>ICASSP</addtitle><description>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</description><subject>Antennas</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Broadband amplifiers</subject><subject>Decision feedback equalizers</subject><subject>Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction</subject><subject>Digital filters</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Frequency diversity</subject><subject>Frequency domain analysis</subject><subject>High power amplifiers</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Multiplexing</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Quantization</subject><subject>Radiocommunications</subject><subject>Signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Signal, noise</subject><subject>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</subject><issn>1520-6149</issn><issn>2379-190X</issn><isbn>9780780384842</isbn><isbn>0780384849</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1LAzEUDH6AtfYX9LIXj1nfS7L58CbVqlCp0B68lbfZrES225JUwX_vSgVhmDnMMAzD2BShRAR38zy7W61eSwGgSpRCO6lP2EhI4zg6eDtlE2csDJBWWSXO2AgrAVyjchfsMucPALBG2RGTy_n9S_GVyyLH_r0L3FNKMaTbgortZ3eInPpD6Hsq_G67pxTzrr9i5y11OUz-dMzW84f17Ikvlo_DsgWPFVTca6cItdForBGVbnxbN1jLgXwTDMqWLDY1SPJOt7Lx3vgqWARCAW1dyTG7PtbuKXvq2kS9j3mzT3FL6XuDQzMY9ZubHnMxhPBvH2-RP72pU3s</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Horlin, F.</creator><creator>Tubbax, J.</creator><creator>Van der Perre, L.</creator><creator>De Man, H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><author>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Antennas</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Broadband amplifiers</topic><topic>Decision feedback equalizers</topic><topic>Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction</topic><topic>Digital filters</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Frequency diversity</topic><topic>Frequency domain analysis</topic><topic>High power amplifiers</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Multiplexing</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Quantization</topic><topic>Radiocommunications</topic><topic>Signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Signal, noise</topic><topic>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubbax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Perre, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horlin, F.</au><au>Tubbax, J.</au><au>Van der Perre, L.</au><au>De Man, H.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</atitle><btitle>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing</btitle><stitle>ICASSP</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>iv</spage><epage>iv</epage><pages>iv-iv</pages><issn>1520-6149</issn><eissn>2379-190X</eissn><isbn>9780780384842</isbn><isbn>0780384849</isbn><abstract>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</abstract><cop>Piscataway, N.J</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1520-6149
ispartof 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004, Vol.4, p.iv-iv
issn 1520-6149
2379-190X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1326936
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Antennas
Applied sciences
Broadband amplifiers
Decision feedback equalizers
Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction
Digital filters
Exact sciences and technology
Filtering
Frequency diversity
Frequency domain analysis
High power amplifiers
Information, signal and communications theory
Multiplexing
OFDM
Performance analysis
Quantization
Radiocommunications
Signal and communications theory
Signal, noise
Systems, networks and services of telecommunications
Telecommunications
Telecommunications and information theory
Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)
title OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=OFDM%20vs.%20single-carrier:%20a%20multi-antenna%20comparison&rft.btitle=2004%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Acoustics,%20Speech,%20and%20Signal%20Processing&rft.au=Horlin,%20F.&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=iv&rft.epage=iv&rft.pages=iv-iv&rft.issn=1520-6149&rft.eissn=2379-190X&rft.isbn=9780780384842&rft.isbn_list=0780384849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_6IE%3E17610745%3C/pascalfrancis_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1326936&rfr_iscdi=true