Loading…
OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison
In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most impo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | iv |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | iv |
container_title | |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Horlin, F. Tubbax, J. Van der Perre, L. De Man, H. |
description | In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1326936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1326936</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>17610745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1LAzEUDH6AtfYX9LIXj1nfS7L58CbVqlCp0B68lbfZrES225JUwX_vSgVhmDnMMAzD2BShRAR38zy7W61eSwGgSpRCO6lP2EhI4zg6eDtlE2csDJBWWSXO2AgrAVyjchfsMucPALBG2RGTy_n9S_GVyyLH_r0L3FNKMaTbgortZ3eInPpD6Hsq_G67pxTzrr9i5y11OUz-dMzW84f17Ikvlo_DsgWPFVTca6cItdForBGVbnxbN1jLgXwTDMqWLDY1SPJOt7Lx3vgqWARCAW1dyTG7PtbuKXvq2kS9j3mzT3FL6XuDQzMY9ZubHnMxhPBvH2-RP72pU3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6149</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780384842</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780384849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2379-190X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway, N.J: IEEE</publisher><subject>Antennas ; Applied sciences ; Broadband amplifiers ; Decision feedback equalizers ; Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction ; Digital filters ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtering ; Frequency diversity ; Frequency domain analysis ; High power amplifiers ; Information, signal and communications theory ; Multiplexing ; OFDM ; Performance analysis ; Quantization ; Radiocommunications ; Signal and communications theory ; Signal, noise ; Systems, networks and services of telecommunications ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</subject><ispartof>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004, Vol.4, p.iv-iv</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1326936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,4035,4036,27904,54534,54899,54911</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1326936$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17610745$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubbax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Perre, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><title>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing</title><addtitle>ICASSP</addtitle><description>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</description><subject>Antennas</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Broadband amplifiers</subject><subject>Decision feedback equalizers</subject><subject>Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction</subject><subject>Digital filters</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Frequency diversity</subject><subject>Frequency domain analysis</subject><subject>High power amplifiers</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Multiplexing</subject><subject>OFDM</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Quantization</subject><subject>Radiocommunications</subject><subject>Signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Signal, noise</subject><subject>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</subject><issn>1520-6149</issn><issn>2379-190X</issn><isbn>9780780384842</isbn><isbn>0780384849</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1LAzEUDH6AtfYX9LIXj1nfS7L58CbVqlCp0B68lbfZrES225JUwX_vSgVhmDnMMAzD2BShRAR38zy7W61eSwGgSpRCO6lP2EhI4zg6eDtlE2csDJBWWSXO2AgrAVyjchfsMucPALBG2RGTy_n9S_GVyyLH_r0L3FNKMaTbgortZ3eInPpD6Hsq_G67pxTzrr9i5y11OUz-dMzW84f17Ikvlo_DsgWPFVTca6cItdForBGVbnxbN1jLgXwTDMqWLDY1SPJOt7Lx3vgqWARCAW1dyTG7PtbuKXvq2kS9j3mzT3FL6XuDQzMY9ZubHnMxhPBvH2-RP72pU3s</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Horlin, F.</creator><creator>Tubbax, J.</creator><creator>Van der Perre, L.</creator><creator>De Man, H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</title><author>Horlin, F. ; Tubbax, J. ; Van der Perre, L. ; De Man, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Antennas</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Broadband amplifiers</topic><topic>Decision feedback equalizers</topic><topic>Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction</topic><topic>Digital filters</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Frequency diversity</topic><topic>Frequency domain analysis</topic><topic>High power amplifiers</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Multiplexing</topic><topic>OFDM</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Quantization</topic><topic>Radiocommunications</topic><topic>Signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Signal, noise</topic><topic>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horlin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubbax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Perre, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Man, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horlin, F.</au><au>Tubbax, J.</au><au>Van der Perre, L.</au><au>De Man, H.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison</atitle><btitle>2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing</btitle><stitle>ICASSP</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>iv</spage><epage>iv</epage><pages>iv-iv</pages><issn>1520-6149</issn><eissn>2379-190X</eissn><isbn>9780780384842</isbn><isbn>0780384849</isbn><abstract>In this paper, we compare high-performance OFDM and single-carrier with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FD) schemes using multiple-antennas and decision-feedback equalization (DFE), while also accounting for the power amplifier efficiency. To make a realistic comparison, we also consider most important digital imperfections such as channel and noise estimation, transmit and receive filtering, clipping and quantization as well as link layer impact. Our analysis shows that for frequency-selective channels, the relative performance impact of the power amplifier is negligible compared to the frequency diversity impact. The higher frequency diversity exploitation of SC-FD allows it to transmit more efficiently than OFDM in most cases. Therefore, SC-FD is a suitable candidate for broadband wireless communication, especially for battery-powered up-link transmission.</abstract><cop>Piscataway, N.J</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-6149 |
ispartof | 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2004, Vol.4, p.iv-iv |
issn | 1520-6149 2379-190X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1326936 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Antennas Applied sciences Broadband amplifiers Decision feedback equalizers Detection, estimation, filtering, equalization, prediction Digital filters Exact sciences and technology Filtering Frequency diversity Frequency domain analysis High power amplifiers Information, signal and communications theory Multiplexing OFDM Performance analysis Quantization Radiocommunications Signal and communications theory Signal, noise Systems, networks and services of telecommunications Telecommunications Telecommunications and information theory Transmission and modulation (techniques and equipments) |
title | OFDM vs. single-carrier: a multi-antenna comparison |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=OFDM%20vs.%20single-carrier:%20a%20multi-antenna%20comparison&rft.btitle=2004%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Acoustics,%20Speech,%20and%20Signal%20Processing&rft.au=Horlin,%20F.&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=iv&rft.epage=iv&rft.pages=iv-iv&rft.issn=1520-6149&rft.eissn=2379-190X&rft.isbn=9780780384842&rft.isbn_list=0780384849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326936&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_6IE%3E17610745%3C/pascalfrancis_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i505-c694a16761787256dcfbd1b3bd1cde713fa81db03ac96f3dcc7c5e810a120fb53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1326936&rfr_iscdi=true |