Loading…

Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study

Risk analysis in human-machines system usually takes into account unintentional errors. The article proposes to analyze intentional errors so-called violations in order to improve, in a first time, risk analysis and in a second time, safety design. After a brief introducing of intentional deviated b...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., Millot, P.
Format:	Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Subjects:	Applied sciences Computer science control theory systems Control theory. Systems Design optimization Error analysis Exact sciences and technology Face Humans Man machine systems Productivity Protection Rail transportation Risk analysis Safety
Online Access:	Request full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	2610 vol.3
container_issue
container_start_page	2605
container_title
container_volume	3
creator	Polet, P. Vanderhaegen, F. Millot, P.
description	Risk analysis in human-machines system usually takes into account unintentional errors. The article proposes to analyze intentional errors so-called violations in order to improve, in a first time, risk analysis and in a second time, safety design. After a brief introducing of intentional deviated behaviour and more precisely, barrier-crossing, the paper presents a model (the BCD model) dedicated to analyse these deviated behaviours. This model is based on the benefit, the cost and the deficit (BCD) associated to a barrier-crossing and considering a multi-criteria approach. The interest of the BCD model is illustrated by the presentation of the results of an experimental study realized on a railway simulator (TRANSPAL). In this experimental study, human operators were faced to barriers and had the choice to deactivate a part of them. The aim of the study was to explain the human operators' choice.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400723
format	conference_proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1400723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1400723</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>17523832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i205t-973db061cd08eecf467a3e6a04f00481841483544257dba8c18286585842858f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1Lw0AQxRc_wLb6D-glF4-ps99TbyVoLVQ8qOCtbJIJXUmTkk2K-e9dqOBlBt78eLw3jN1ymHMOi4d19v6azQWAmnMFYIU8YxOhrU250fqcTcEiSNTG2As24WBEuhDi64pNQ_gGEKA4Tthq2bh6DD4kbZX4pqem922Ukt2wd01S0tG7nsokp507-nboHpMo08-BOr-PcCRDP5TjNbusXB3o5m_P2Ofz00f2km7eVutsuUm9AN2nCyvLHAwvSkCiolLGOknGgapiEeSouEKplYpFytxhwVGg0ahRiTgqOWP3J9-DC4Wrq841hQ_bQ0zjunHLrRYSpYjc3YnzRPR_Pj1K_gJY5Vmh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Polet, P. ; Vanderhaegen, F. ; Millot, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Polet, P. ; Vanderhaegen, F. ; Millot, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Risk analysis in human-machines system usually takes into account unintentional errors. The article proposes to analyze intentional errors so-called violations in order to improve, in a first time, risk analysis and in a second time, safety design. After a brief introducing of intentional deviated behaviour and more precisely, barrier-crossing, the paper presents a model (the BCD model) dedicated to analyse these deviated behaviours. This model is based on the benefit, the cost and the deficit (BCD) associated to a barrier-crossing and considering a multi-criteria approach. The interest of the BCD model is illustrated by the presentation of the results of an experimental study realized on a railway simulator (TRANSPAL). In this experimental study, human operators were faced to barriers and had the choice to deactivate a part of them. The aim of the study was to explain the human operators' choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-922X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780385667</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780385665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2577-1655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400723</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway NJ: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Control theory. Systems ; Design optimization ; Error analysis ; Exact sciences and technology ; Face ; Humans ; Man machine systems ; Productivity ; Protection ; Rail transportation ; Risk analysis ; Safety</subject><ispartof>2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583), 2004, Vol.3, p.2605-2610 vol.3</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1400723$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1400723$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17523832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Polet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhaegen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millot, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study</title><title>2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)</title><addtitle>ICSMC</addtitle><description>Risk analysis in human-machines system usually takes into account unintentional errors. The article proposes to analyze intentional errors so-called violations in order to improve, in a first time, risk analysis and in a second time, safety design. After a brief introducing of intentional deviated behaviour and more precisely, barrier-crossing, the paper presents a model (the BCD model) dedicated to analyse these deviated behaviours. This model is based on the benefit, the cost and the deficit (BCD) associated to a barrier-crossing and considering a multi-criteria approach. The interest of the BCD model is illustrated by the presentation of the results of an experimental study realized on a railway simulator (TRANSPAL). In this experimental study, human operators were faced to barriers and had the choice to deactivate a part of them. The aim of the study was to explain the human operators' choice.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Man machine systems</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Rail transportation</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><issn>1062-922X</issn><issn>2577-1655</issn><isbn>0780385667</isbn><isbn>9780780385665</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1Lw0AQxRc_wLb6D-glF4-ps99TbyVoLVQ8qOCtbJIJXUmTkk2K-e9dqOBlBt78eLw3jN1ymHMOi4d19v6azQWAmnMFYIU8YxOhrU250fqcTcEiSNTG2As24WBEuhDi64pNQ_gGEKA4Tthq2bh6DD4kbZX4pqem922Ukt2wd01S0tG7nsokp507-nboHpMo08-BOr-PcCRDP5TjNbusXB3o5m_P2Ofz00f2km7eVutsuUm9AN2nCyvLHAwvSkCiolLGOknGgapiEeSouEKplYpFytxhwVGg0ahRiTgqOWP3J9-DC4Wrq841hQ_bQ0zjunHLrRYSpYjc3YnzRPR_Pj1K_gJY5Vmh</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Polet, P.</creator><creator>Vanderhaegen, F.</creator><creator>Millot, P.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study</title><author>Polet, P. ; Vanderhaegen, F. ; Millot, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i205t-973db061cd08eecf467a3e6a04f00481841483544257dba8c18286585842858f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Man machine systems</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Rail transportation</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Polet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhaegen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millot, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Polet, P.</au><au>Vanderhaegen, F.</au><au>Millot, P.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study</atitle><btitle>2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)</btitle><stitle>ICSMC</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>2605</spage><epage>2610 vol.3</epage><pages>2605-2610 vol.3</pages><issn>1062-922X</issn><eissn>2577-1655</eissn><isbn>0780385667</isbn><isbn>9780780385665</isbn><abstract>Risk analysis in human-machines system usually takes into account unintentional errors. The article proposes to analyze intentional errors so-called violations in order to improve, in a first time, risk analysis and in a second time, safety design. After a brief introducing of intentional deviated behaviour and more precisely, barrier-crossing, the paper presents a model (the BCD model) dedicated to analyse these deviated behaviours. This model is based on the benefit, the cost and the deficit (BCD) associated to a barrier-crossing and considering a multi-criteria approach. The interest of the BCD model is illustrated by the presentation of the results of an experimental study realized on a railway simulator (TRANSPAL). In this experimental study, human operators were faced to barriers and had the choice to deactivate a part of them. The aim of the study was to explain the human operators' choice.</abstract><cop>Piscataway NJ</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400723</doi></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISSN: 1062-922X
ispartof	2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583), 2004, Vol.3, p.2605-2610 vol.3
issn	1062-922X 2577-1655
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_1400723
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Applied sciences Computer science control theory systems Control theory. Systems Design optimization Error analysis Exact sciences and technology Face Humans Man machine systems Productivity Protection Rail transportation Risk analysis Safety
title	Analysis of intentional human deviated behaviour: an experimental study
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A01%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20intentional%20human%20deviated%20behaviour:%20an%20experimental%20study&rft.btitle=2004%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Systems,%20Man%20and%20Cybernetics%20(IEEE%20Cat.%20No.04CH37583)&rft.au=Polet,%20P.&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=2605&rft.epage=2610%20vol.3&rft.pages=2605-2610%20vol.3&rft.issn=1062-922X&rft.eissn=2577-1655&rft.isbn=0780385667&rft.isbn_list=9780780385665&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400723&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_6IE%3E17523832%3C/pascalfrancis_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i205t-973db061cd08eecf467a3e6a04f00481841483544257dba8c18286585842858f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1400723&rfr_iscdi=true