Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus

Choosing the type of controller to use for a particular application is not trivial. This choice is often made heuristically by the design engineer. It is normally based on experience and qualitative examination of the open-loop and desired closed-loop system characteristics. This paper examines a st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Regier, C.N., Pieper, J.K.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptive control
Control systems
Costs
DC motors
Design engineering
Open loop systems
Power system modeling
Programmable control
Servomotors
State feedback
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 769
container_issue
container_start_page 763
container_title
container_volume
creator Regier, C.N.
Pieper, J.K.
description Choosing the type of controller to use for a particular application is not trivial. This choice is often made heuristically by the design engineer. It is normally based on experience and qualitative examination of the open-loop and desired closed-loop system characteristics. This paper examines a state feedback controller, a state feedback controller with an integral state, a model-following controller, and a model-reference adaptive controller as they are applied to position control for a DC motor. The controllers are evaluated using cost functions for both performance and control effort. This type of analysis can help the designer determine which controller should be selected to accomplish a particular set of control objectives
doi_str_mv 10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557041
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1557041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1557041</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1557041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_15570413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jssKwjAURC8-wPr4Ad3kB1pv2qZJ1yHi0oX7EuQWKm0iSRX9e7twLQzMgYHDAOw5ZpxjfdTaaJPliCLjQkgs-QySXMgqnbiaw66WCqcUSikhF5CgKjGVUtUrWMd4R8RSVWUCtXk_KHQDudH2zLzt0Dk7dt4x3zLt3Rh831NgFwqtD4N1N2IvCvEZt7BsbR9p9-sNHE7mqs9pR0TNY3La8Gl-74r_6xePzDrU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Regier, C.N. ; Pieper, J.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Regier, C.N. ; Pieper, J.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Choosing the type of controller to use for a particular application is not trivial. This choice is often made heuristically by the design engineer. It is normally based on experience and qualitative examination of the open-loop and desired closed-loop system characteristics. This paper examines a state feedback controller, a state feedback controller with an integral state, a model-following controller, and a model-reference adaptive controller as they are applied to position control for a DC motor. The controllers are evaluated using cost functions for both performance and control effort. This type of analysis can help the designer determine which controller should be selected to accomplish a particular set of control objectives</description><identifier>ISSN: 0840-7789</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780388857</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780388852</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-7046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptive control ; Control systems ; Costs ; DC motors ; Design engineering ; Open loop systems ; Power system modeling ; Programmable control ; Servomotors ; State feedback</subject><ispartof>Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005, 2005, p.763-769</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1557041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,27902,54530,54895,54907</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1557041$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Regier, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, J.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus</title><title>Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005</title><addtitle>CCECE</addtitle><description>Choosing the type of controller to use for a particular application is not trivial. This choice is often made heuristically by the design engineer. It is normally based on experience and qualitative examination of the open-loop and desired closed-loop system characteristics. This paper examines a state feedback controller, a state feedback controller with an integral state, a model-following controller, and a model-reference adaptive controller as they are applied to position control for a DC motor. The controllers are evaluated using cost functions for both performance and control effort. This type of analysis can help the designer determine which controller should be selected to accomplish a particular set of control objectives</description><subject>Adaptive control</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>DC motors</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Open loop systems</subject><subject>Power system modeling</subject><subject>Programmable control</subject><subject>Servomotors</subject><subject>State feedback</subject><issn>0840-7789</issn><issn>2576-7046</issn><isbn>9780780388857</isbn><isbn>0780388852</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jssKwjAURC8-wPr4Ad3kB1pv2qZJ1yHi0oX7EuQWKm0iSRX9e7twLQzMgYHDAOw5ZpxjfdTaaJPliCLjQkgs-QySXMgqnbiaw66WCqcUSikhF5CgKjGVUtUrWMd4R8RSVWUCtXk_KHQDudH2zLzt0Dk7dt4x3zLt3Rh831NgFwqtD4N1N2IvCvEZt7BsbR9p9-sNHE7mqs9pR0TNY3La8Gl-74r_6xePzDrU</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Regier, C.N.</creator><creator>Pieper, J.K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus</title><author>Regier, C.N. ; Pieper, J.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_15570413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptive control</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>DC motors</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Open loop systems</topic><topic>Power system modeling</topic><topic>Programmable control</topic><topic>Servomotors</topic><topic>State feedback</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Regier, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, J.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Regier, C.N.</au><au>Pieper, J.K.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus</atitle><btitle>Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005</btitle><stitle>CCECE</stitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>763</spage><epage>769</epage><pages>763-769</pages><issn>0840-7789</issn><eissn>2576-7046</eissn><isbn>9780780388857</isbn><isbn>0780388852</isbn><abstract>Choosing the type of controller to use for a particular application is not trivial. This choice is often made heuristically by the design engineer. It is normally based on experience and qualitative examination of the open-loop and desired closed-loop system characteristics. This paper examines a state feedback controller, a state feedback controller with an integral state, a model-following controller, and a model-reference adaptive controller as they are applied to position control for a DC motor. The controllers are evaluated using cost functions for both performance and control effort. This type of analysis can help the designer determine which controller should be selected to accomplish a particular set of control objectives</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557041</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0840-7789
ispartof Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005, 2005, p.763-769
issn 0840-7789
2576-7046
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1557041
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Adaptive control
Control systems
Costs
DC motors
Design engineering
Open loop systems
Power system modeling
Programmable control
Servomotors
State feedback
title Experimental Examination of Controller Performance versus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T07%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Examination%20of%20Controller%20Performance%20versus&rft.btitle=Canadian%20Conference%20on%20Electrical%20and%20Computer%20Engineering,%202005&rft.au=Regier,%20C.N.&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=769&rft.pages=763-769&rft.issn=0840-7789&rft.eissn=2576-7046&rft.isbn=9780780388857&rft.isbn_list=0780388852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CCECE.2005.1557041&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1557041%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_15570413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1557041&rfr_iscdi=true