Loading…

Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance

A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent sample...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Sammartino, P.F., Baker, C.J., Griffiths, H.D.
Format:	Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Subjects:	Backscatter Clutter Educational institutions Frequency MIMO Radar antennas Radar cross section Radar signal processing Signal processing Transmitting antennas
Online Access:	Request full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	V
container_issue
container_start_page	V
container_title
container_volume	5
creator	Sammartino, P.F. Baker, C.J. Griffiths, H.D.
description	A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent samples and there is no a priori information available to the netted radar enabling the incoming signals to be phase-aligned (P.F. Sammartino et al., 2006). Here we consider a more detailed model for target backscatter in order to gain a deeper sight into the true potential of these radar signal processing techniques. The overall aim of this work is to understand the performances available when real targets are under surveillance and to understand which conditions make MIMO perform best or, at least, better than a netted radar system. The target models introduced here are a step towards this aim
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1661479
format	conference_proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1661479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1661479</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1661479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_16614793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jrsOgkAQADc-EonyBTT3A-DucR5caYxGCyIRCjtygcVgVMxh499rYW01xUwxAAFhRIRmedisiyKPJKKOSGtSiRmBJ-PEhGTwPAbfJCkpqRQqbdIJeLSSGH5DMwN_GK6ISEYnKpYeRKV1F36JrG_4JrZty_VrEP1DZIfsKE62sU7k7Nre3e2j5gVMW3sb2P9xDsFuW272YcfM1dN1d-ve1e8q_m8_Bts2JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Sammartino, P.F. ; Baker, C.J. ; Griffiths, H.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sammartino, P.F. ; Baker, C.J. ; Griffiths, H.D.</creatorcontrib><description>A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent samples and there is no a priori information available to the netted radar enabling the incoming signals to be phase-aligned (P.F. Sammartino et al., 2006). Here we consider a more detailed model for target backscatter in order to gain a deeper sight into the true potential of these radar signal processing techniques. The overall aim of this work is to understand the performances available when real targets are under surveillance and to understand which conditions make MIMO perform best or, at least, better than a netted radar system. The target models introduced here are a step towards this aim</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6149</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424404698</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 142440469X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2379-190X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1661479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Backscatter ; Clutter ; Educational institutions ; Frequency ; MIMO ; Radar antennas ; Radar cross section ; Radar signal processing ; Signal processing ; Transmitting antennas</subject><ispartof>2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings, 2006, Vol.5, p.V-V</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1661479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1661479$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sammartino, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, H.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance</title><title>2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings</title><addtitle>ICASSP</addtitle><description>A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent samples and there is no a priori information available to the netted radar enabling the incoming signals to be phase-aligned (P.F. Sammartino et al., 2006). Here we consider a more detailed model for target backscatter in order to gain a deeper sight into the true potential of these radar signal processing techniques. The overall aim of this work is to understand the performances available when real targets are under surveillance and to understand which conditions make MIMO perform best or, at least, better than a netted radar system. The target models introduced here are a step towards this aim</description><subject>Backscatter</subject><subject>Clutter</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>MIMO</subject><subject>Radar antennas</subject><subject>Radar cross section</subject><subject>Radar signal processing</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Transmitting antennas</subject><issn>1520-6149</issn><issn>2379-190X</issn><isbn>9781424404698</isbn><isbn>142440469X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jrsOgkAQADc-EonyBTT3A-DucR5caYxGCyIRCjtygcVgVMxh499rYW01xUwxAAFhRIRmedisiyKPJKKOSGtSiRmBJ-PEhGTwPAbfJCkpqRQqbdIJeLSSGH5DMwN_GK6ISEYnKpYeRKV1F36JrG_4JrZty_VrEP1DZIfsKE62sU7k7Nre3e2j5gVMW3sb2P9xDsFuW272YcfM1dN1d-ve1e8q_m8_Bts2JQ</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Sammartino, P.F.</creator><creator>Baker, C.J.</creator><creator>Griffiths, H.D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance</title><author>Sammartino, P.F. ; Baker, C.J. ; Griffiths, H.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_16614793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Backscatter</topic><topic>Clutter</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>MIMO</topic><topic>Radar antennas</topic><topic>Radar cross section</topic><topic>Radar signal processing</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Transmitting antennas</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sammartino, P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, H.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sammartino, P.F.</au><au>Baker, C.J.</au><au>Griffiths, H.D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance</atitle><btitle>2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings</btitle><stitle>ICASSP</stitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>V</spage><epage>V</epage><pages>V-V</pages><issn>1520-6149</issn><eissn>2379-190X</eissn><isbn>9781424404698</isbn><isbn>142440469X</isbn><abstract>A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent samples and there is no a priori information available to the netted radar enabling the incoming signals to be phase-aligned (P.F. Sammartino et al., 2006). Here we consider a more detailed model for target backscatter in order to gain a deeper sight into the true potential of these radar signal processing techniques. The overall aim of this work is to understand the performances available when real targets are under surveillance and to understand which conditions make MIMO perform best or, at least, better than a netted radar system. The target models introduced here are a step towards this aim</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1661479</doi></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISSN: 1520-6149
ispartof	2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings, 2006, Vol.5, p.V-V
issn	1520-6149 2379-190X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_1661479
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Backscatter Clutter Educational institutions Frequency MIMO Radar antennas Radar cross section Radar signal processing Signal processing Transmitting antennas
title	Target Model Effects on MIMO Radar Performance
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Target%20Model%20Effects%20on%20MIMO%20Radar%20Performance&rft.btitle=2006%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Acoustics%20Speech%20and%20Signal%20Processing%20Proceedings&rft.au=Sammartino,%20P.F.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=V&rft.epage=V&rft.pages=V-V&rft.issn=1520-6149&rft.eissn=2379-190X&rft.isbn=9781424404698&rft.isbn_list=142440469X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1661479&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E1661479%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_16614793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1661479&rfr_iscdi=true