Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization

Localization error bounds are presented for both electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) as graphical error contours for a 37-sensor arrangement. Both one and two dipole cases were examined for all possible dipole orientations and locations within a head quadrant. The results s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mosher, J.C., Spencer, M.E., Leahy, R.M., Lewis, P.S.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Brain modeling
Electroencephalography
Humans
Image processing
Image sensors
Laboratories
Magnetic field measurement
Magnetic heads
Optimization methods
Signal processing
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 155 vol.1
container_issue
container_start_page 150
container_title
container_volume
creator Mosher, J.C.
Spencer, M.E.
Leahy, R.M.
Lewis, P.S.
description Localization error bounds are presented for both electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) as graphical error contours for a 37-sensor arrangement. Both one and two dipole cases were examined for all possible dipole orientations and locations within a head quadrant. The results show a strong dependence on absolute dipole location and orientation. The results also show that fusion of the EEG and MEG measurements into a combined model reduces the lower bound. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to check the tightness of the bounds for a selected case. The simple head model, the white and relatively low power noise, and the few relatively strong dipoles were all selected in this study as optimistic conditions to establish possibly fundamental resolution limits for any localization effort.< >
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACSSC.1992.269277
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_269277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>269277</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>269277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-b0bcd238ddf4300f0c67ee5baf1bfebde8e7af1577db0b8d923b0e202a3368983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tOwzAURC0eEqH0A2CVH0i49o1fyyoKBamIRWFd2fG1FBQSZLcL-HoildmcsxiNNIzdc6g5B_u4aff7tubWilooK7S-YIWQWlUCAS_ZLRhuFHIFcMUKDtJUCi3esHXOn7CkkbyRumDQpTSn0s-nKeQyLvrabUs3hbJbmOdT6qkc596Nw687DvN0x66jGzOt_7liH0_de_tc7d62L-1mVw1cN8fKg--DQBNCbBAgQq80kfQuch_JBzKkF5dah6VqghXogQQIh6iMNbhiD-fdgYgO32n4cunncP6Kfw9URV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Mosher, J.C. ; Spencer, M.E. ; Leahy, R.M. ; Lewis, P.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosher, J.C. ; Spencer, M.E. ; Leahy, R.M. ; Lewis, P.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Localization error bounds are presented for both electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) as graphical error contours for a 37-sensor arrangement. Both one and two dipole cases were examined for all possible dipole orientations and locations within a head quadrant. The results show a strong dependence on absolute dipole location and orientation. The results also show that fusion of the EEG and MEG measurements into a combined model reduces the lower bound. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to check the tightness of the bounds for a selected case. The simple head model, the white and relatively low power noise, and the few relatively strong dipoles were all selected in this study as optimistic conditions to establish possibly fundamental resolution limits for any localization effort.&lt; &gt;</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-6393</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0818631600</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780818631603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-2303</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACSSC.1992.269277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE Comput. Soc. Press</publisher><subject>Brain modeling ; Electroencephalography ; Humans ; Image processing ; Image sensors ; Laboratories ; Magnetic field measurement ; Magnetic heads ; Optimization methods ; Signal processing</subject><ispartof>[1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems &amp; Computers, 1992, p.150-155 vol.1</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/269277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/269277$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosher, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leahy, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, P.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization</title><title>[1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems &amp; Computers</title><addtitle>ACSSC</addtitle><description>Localization error bounds are presented for both electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) as graphical error contours for a 37-sensor arrangement. Both one and two dipole cases were examined for all possible dipole orientations and locations within a head quadrant. The results show a strong dependence on absolute dipole location and orientation. The results also show that fusion of the EEG and MEG measurements into a combined model reduces the lower bound. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to check the tightness of the bounds for a selected case. The simple head model, the white and relatively low power noise, and the few relatively strong dipoles were all selected in this study as optimistic conditions to establish possibly fundamental resolution limits for any localization effort.&lt; &gt;</description><subject>Brain modeling</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image sensors</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Magnetic field measurement</subject><subject>Magnetic heads</subject><subject>Optimization methods</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><issn>1058-6393</issn><issn>2576-2303</issn><isbn>0818631600</isbn><isbn>9780818631603</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tOwzAURC0eEqH0A2CVH0i49o1fyyoKBamIRWFd2fG1FBQSZLcL-HoildmcsxiNNIzdc6g5B_u4aff7tubWilooK7S-YIWQWlUCAS_ZLRhuFHIFcMUKDtJUCi3esHXOn7CkkbyRumDQpTSn0s-nKeQyLvrabUs3hbJbmOdT6qkc596Nw687DvN0x66jGzOt_7liH0_de_tc7d62L-1mVw1cN8fKg--DQBNCbBAgQq80kfQuch_JBzKkF5dah6VqghXogQQIh6iMNbhiD-fdgYgO32n4cunncP6Kfw9URV0</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Mosher, J.C.</creator><creator>Spencer, M.E.</creator><creator>Leahy, R.M.</creator><creator>Lewis, P.S.</creator><general>IEEE Comput. Soc. Press</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization</title><author>Mosher, J.C. ; Spencer, M.E. ; Leahy, R.M. ; Lewis, P.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-b0bcd238ddf4300f0c67ee5baf1bfebde8e7af1577db0b8d923b0e202a3368983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Brain modeling</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image sensors</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Magnetic field measurement</topic><topic>Magnetic heads</topic><topic>Optimization methods</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosher, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leahy, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, P.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosher, J.C.</au><au>Spencer, M.E.</au><au>Leahy, R.M.</au><au>Lewis, P.S.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization</atitle><btitle>[1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems &amp; Computers</btitle><stitle>ACSSC</stitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><spage>150</spage><epage>155 vol.1</epage><pages>150-155 vol.1</pages><issn>1058-6393</issn><eissn>2576-2303</eissn><isbn>0818631600</isbn><isbn>9780818631603</isbn><abstract>Localization error bounds are presented for both electroencephalograms (EEGs) and magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) as graphical error contours for a 37-sensor arrangement. Both one and two dipole cases were examined for all possible dipole orientations and locations within a head quadrant. The results show a strong dependence on absolute dipole location and orientation. The results also show that fusion of the EEG and MEG measurements into a combined model reduces the lower bound. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to check the tightness of the bounds for a selected case. The simple head model, the white and relatively low power noise, and the few relatively strong dipoles were all selected in this study as optimistic conditions to establish possibly fundamental resolution limits for any localization effort.&lt; &gt;</abstract><pub>IEEE Comput. Soc. Press</pub><doi>10.1109/ACSSC.1992.269277</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1058-6393
ispartof [1992] Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 1992, p.150-155 vol.1
issn 1058-6393
2576-2303
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_269277
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Brain modeling
Electroencephalography
Humans
Image processing
Image sensors
Laboratories
Magnetic field measurement
Magnetic heads
Optimization methods
Signal processing
title Error bounds for MEG and EEG source localization
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Error%20bounds%20for%20MEG%20and%20EEG%20source%20localization&rft.btitle=%5B1992%5D%20Conference%20Record%20of%20the%20Twenty-Sixth%20Asilomar%20Conference%20on%20Signals,%20Systems%20&%20Computers&rft.au=Mosher,%20J.C.&rft.date=1992&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=155%20vol.1&rft.pages=150-155%20vol.1&rft.issn=1058-6393&rft.eissn=2576-2303&rft.isbn=0818631600&rft.isbn_list=9780818631603&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACSSC.1992.269277&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E269277%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-b0bcd238ddf4300f0c67ee5baf1bfebde8e7af1577db0b8d923b0e202a3368983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=269277&rfr_iscdi=true