Loading…
Incorporating Performance Testing in Test-Driven Development
Our performance-testing approach required manually inspecting the performance logs. During the project's development, JUnit-based performance testing tools, such as JUnitPerf, weren't available. Such tools provide better visibility of performance problems than manual inspection of performa...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE software 2007-05, Vol.24 (3), p.67-73 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Our performance-testing approach required manually inspecting the performance logs. During the project's development, JUnit-based performance testing tools, such as JUnitPerf, weren't available. Such tools provide better visibility of performance problems than manual inspection of performance logs. Although we believe manual inspection of performance trends is necessary, specifying the bottom-line performance in assert-based test cases can complement the use of performance log files, making the TFP testing results more visible to the developers. We're investigating the design of assert-based performance testing to improve the TFP process. Another direction of future work is automatic performance test generation. In this project, we relied on the performance architect's experience to identify the execution paths and measurement points for performance testing. We can derive this crucial information for performance testing from the performance requirements and system design. We plan to find guidelines for specifications of performance requirements and system design to make the automation possible |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0740-7459 1937-4194 |
DOI: | 10.1109/MS.2007.77 |