Loading…
Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java
Integrity is a dependability attribute partially ensured through runtime validation of integrity constraints. A wide range of different constraint validation approaches exists--ranging from simple if conditions over explicit constraint validation methods and contract specifications to constraints as...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: |
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software verification and validation
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software verification and validation
> Empirical software validation
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software verification and validation
> Process validation
|
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 322 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Froihofer, Lorenz Glos, Gerhard Osrael, Johannes Goeschka, Karl M. |
description | Integrity is a dependability attribute partially ensured through runtime validation of integrity constraints. A wide range of different constraint validation approaches exists--ranging from simple if conditions over explicit constraint validation methods and contract specifications to constraints as first class runtime entities of an application. However, increased support for explicitness and flexibility often comes at the price of increased performance costs. To address this issue, we contribute with an overview and evaluation of different constraint validation approaches for the Java programming language with respect to implementation, maintainability and performance. Our results show that the benefits of some of the more advanced approaches are certainly worth their costs by introducing a runtime overhead of only two to ten times the runtime of the fastest approach while other approaches introduce runtime overheads of more than 100, which might be simply too slow in certain applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICSE.2007.60 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4222593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4222593</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>31677375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bf71e16ba541f83f0141f12024ad098a0a3790853b2034eec49475d1113a535e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0eElXpxsaSBRaUcq8dx_FYRS0UVerAY7VuEkcY0qTEaRD_nlThB3CXM5xPR1cfY1cIc0TQ9-v0eTnnAGoewwmboJRJiJzLUzbTKgEVa8kTnuAZmwBXEEou1QWbef8BwwkdC40Tlm572_bOfgdUF8Gyp-pAnWvqoCmDtKl915Kru-CNKleMxWK_bxvK360PXB08UU-X7LykytvZX07Z62r5kj6Gm-3DOl1sQuKKd2FWKrQYZyQjLBNRAg6JHHhEBeiEgITSkEiRcRCRtXmkIyULRBQkhbRiym7H3eGBr4P1ndk5n9uqoto2B28ExkoJJQfwegSdtdbsW7ej9sdEfLCjxdDejS3lO5M1zac3CObo1BydmqNTE4PJWmfLgb75Dy1-AS7ZcI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>31677375</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Froihofer, Lorenz ; Glos, Gerhard ; Osrael, Johannes ; Goeschka, Karl M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Froihofer, Lorenz ; Glos, Gerhard ; Osrael, Johannes ; Goeschka, Karl M.</creatorcontrib><description>Integrity is a dependability attribute partially ensured through runtime validation of integrity constraints. A wide range of different constraint validation approaches exists--ranging from simple if conditions over explicit constraint validation methods and contract specifications to constraints as first class runtime entities of an application. However, increased support for explicitness and flexibility often comes at the price of increased performance costs. To address this issue, we contribute with an overview and evaluation of different constraint validation approaches for the Java programming language with respect to implementation, maintainability and performance. Our results show that the benefits of some of the more advanced approaches are certainly worth their costs by introducing a runtime overhead of only two to ten times the runtime of the fastest approach while other approaches introduce runtime overheads of more than 100, which might be simply too slow in certain applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-5257</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769528281</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769528287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2007.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Computer languages ; Contracts ; Costs ; General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Metrics ; General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Validation ; Information systems ; Java ; Logic ; Runtime ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Empirical software validation ; Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Process validation ; Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools -- General programming languages -- Language types ; System analysis and design ; Unified modeling language</subject><ispartof>29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), 2007, p.313-322</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4222593$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4222593$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froihofer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glos, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osrael, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeschka, Karl M.</creatorcontrib><title>Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java</title><title>29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07)</title><addtitle>ICSE</addtitle><description>Integrity is a dependability attribute partially ensured through runtime validation of integrity constraints. A wide range of different constraint validation approaches exists--ranging from simple if conditions over explicit constraint validation methods and contract specifications to constraints as first class runtime entities of an application. However, increased support for explicitness and flexibility often comes at the price of increased performance costs. To address this issue, we contribute with an overview and evaluation of different constraint validation approaches for the Java programming language with respect to implementation, maintainability and performance. Our results show that the benefits of some of the more advanced approaches are certainly worth their costs by introducing a runtime overhead of only two to ten times the runtime of the fastest approach while other approaches introduce runtime overheads of more than 100, which might be simply too slow in certain applications.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Computer languages</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Metrics</subject><subject>General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Validation</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Java</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Empirical software validation</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Process validation</subject><subject>Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools -- General programming languages -- Language types</subject><subject>System analysis and design</subject><subject>Unified modeling language</subject><issn>0270-5257</issn><issn>1558-1225</issn><isbn>9780769528281</isbn><isbn>0769528287</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDtPwzAUhS0eElXpxsaSBRaUcq8dx_FYRS0UVerAY7VuEkcY0qTEaRD_nlThB3CXM5xPR1cfY1cIc0TQ9-v0eTnnAGoewwmboJRJiJzLUzbTKgEVa8kTnuAZmwBXEEou1QWbef8BwwkdC40Tlm572_bOfgdUF8Gyp-pAnWvqoCmDtKl915Kru-CNKleMxWK_bxvK360PXB08UU-X7LykytvZX07Z62r5kj6Gm-3DOl1sQuKKd2FWKrQYZyQjLBNRAg6JHHhEBeiEgITSkEiRcRCRtXmkIyULRBQkhbRiym7H3eGBr4P1ndk5n9uqoto2B28ExkoJJQfwegSdtdbsW7ej9sdEfLCjxdDejS3lO5M1zac3CObo1BydmqNTE4PJWmfLgb75Dy1-AS7ZcI0</recordid><startdate>20070524</startdate><enddate>20070524</enddate><creator>Froihofer, Lorenz</creator><creator>Glos, Gerhard</creator><creator>Osrael, Johannes</creator><creator>Goeschka, Karl M.</creator><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070524</creationdate><title>Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java</title><author>Froihofer, Lorenz ; Glos, Gerhard ; Osrael, Johannes ; Goeschka, Karl M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bf71e16ba541f83f0141f12024ad098a0a3790853b2034eec49475d1113a535e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Computer languages</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Metrics</topic><topic>General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Validation</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Java</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Empirical software validation</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Process validation</topic><topic>Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools -- General programming languages -- Language types</topic><topic>System analysis and design</topic><topic>Unified modeling language</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froihofer, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glos, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osrael, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeschka, Karl M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froihofer, Lorenz</au><au>Glos, Gerhard</au><au>Osrael, Johannes</au><au>Goeschka, Karl M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java</atitle><btitle>29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07)</btitle><stitle>ICSE</stitle><date>2007-05-24</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>313</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>313-322</pages><issn>0270-5257</issn><eissn>1558-1225</eissn><isbn>9780769528281</isbn><isbn>0769528287</isbn><abstract>Integrity is a dependability attribute partially ensured through runtime validation of integrity constraints. A wide range of different constraint validation approaches exists--ranging from simple if conditions over explicit constraint validation methods and contract specifications to constraints as first class runtime entities of an application. However, increased support for explicitness and flexibility often comes at the price of increased performance costs. To address this issue, we contribute with an overview and evaluation of different constraint validation approaches for the Java programming language with respect to implementation, maintainability and performance. Our results show that the benefits of some of the more advanced approaches are certainly worth their costs by introducing a runtime overhead of only two to ten times the runtime of the fastest approach while other approaches introduce runtime overheads of more than 100, which might be simply too slow in certain applications.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC, USA</cop><pub>IEEE Computer Society</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSE.2007.60</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-5257 |
ispartof | 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), 2007, p.313-322 |
issn | 0270-5257 1558-1225 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4222593 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | Buildings Computer languages Contracts Costs General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Metrics General and reference -- Cross-computing tools and techniques -- Validation Information systems Java Logic Runtime Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Empirical software validation Software and its engineering -- Software creation and management -- Software verification and validation -- Process validation Software and its engineering -- Software notations and tools -- General programming languages -- Language types System analysis and design Unified modeling language |
title | Overview and Evaluation of Constraint Validation Approaches in Java |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Overview%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Constraint%20Validation%20Approaches%20in%20Java&rft.btitle=29th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Software%20Engineering%20(ICSE'07)&rft.au=Froihofer,%20Lorenz&rft.date=2007-05-24&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=313-322&rft.issn=0270-5257&rft.eissn=1558-1225&rft.isbn=9780769528281&rft.isbn_list=0769528287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSE.2007.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_CHZPO%3E31677375%3C/proquest_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a272t-bf71e16ba541f83f0141f12024ad098a0a3790853b2034eec49475d1113a535e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31677375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4222593&rfr_iscdi=true |