Loading…
A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters
The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | eng ; jpn |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 346 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Jitsumatsu, Y. Ogata, M. Kohda, T. |
description | The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4673432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4673432</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4673432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFKxDAYhCMiqGtfQC95gdb8SZsmx6XsroVFwdXz8rdJ3Ei3DU0X8e0t2LkM8zHMYQh5BJYBMP1cV4fNIeOMqSyXpcgFvyL3SiglmC64uiaJLtWS85LfkiTGbzZLaFlIuCOva9oO54Cjj0NPGzv9WNvTMA4dTpbGcLLj4A12FHtDd3iJ0WNPt_U7DZcuzo0TBt9_Uee7yY7xgdw4nHmy-Ip8bjcf1Uu6f9vV1XqfeihhSh2CMU7YpsgLDkYo6fKibRm0AAKt4VIqwxUrZdO6HBreas4RVGm1QtlosSJP_7veWnsMoz_j-HtcLhB_MDhQCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><description>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9788388309472</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 8388309471</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 8388309528</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9788388309526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Bit error rate ; Digital filters ; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions ; Field programmable gate arrays ; Finite impulse response filter ; Intersymbol interference ; Multiaccess communication ; Multiple access interference ; Pulse shaping methods</subject><ispartof>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems, 2008, p.343-346</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4673432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4673432$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogata, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><title>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems</title><addtitle>ICSES</addtitle><description>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Bit error rate</subject><subject>Digital filters</subject><subject>Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions</subject><subject>Field programmable gate arrays</subject><subject>Finite impulse response filter</subject><subject>Intersymbol interference</subject><subject>Multiaccess communication</subject><subject>Multiple access interference</subject><subject>Pulse shaping methods</subject><isbn>9788388309472</isbn><isbn>8388309471</isbn><isbn>8388309528</isbn><isbn>9788388309526</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMFKxDAYhCMiqGtfQC95gdb8SZsmx6XsroVFwdXz8rdJ3Ei3DU0X8e0t2LkM8zHMYQh5BJYBMP1cV4fNIeOMqSyXpcgFvyL3SiglmC64uiaJLtWS85LfkiTGbzZLaFlIuCOva9oO54Cjj0NPGzv9WNvTMA4dTpbGcLLj4A12FHtDd3iJ0WNPt_U7DZcuzo0TBt9_Uee7yY7xgdw4nHmy-Ip8bjcf1Uu6f9vV1XqfeihhSh2CMU7YpsgLDkYo6fKibRm0AAKt4VIqwxUrZdO6HBreas4RVGm1QtlosSJP_7veWnsMoz_j-HtcLhB_MDhQCQ</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creator><creator>Ogata, M.</creator><creator>Kohda, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><author>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Bit error rate</topic><topic>Digital filters</topic><topic>Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions</topic><topic>Field programmable gate arrays</topic><topic>Finite impulse response filter</topic><topic>Intersymbol interference</topic><topic>Multiaccess communication</topic><topic>Multiple access interference</topic><topic>Pulse shaping methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogata, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jitsumatsu, Y.</au><au>Ogata, M.</au><au>Kohda, T.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</atitle><btitle>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems</btitle><stitle>ICSES</stitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>343</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>343-346</pages><isbn>9788388309472</isbn><isbn>8388309471</isbn><eisbn>8388309528</eisbn><eisbn>9788388309526</eisbn><abstract>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 9788388309472 |
ispartof | 2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems, 2008, p.343-346 |
issn | |
language | eng ; jpn |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_4673432 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Bandwidth Bit error rate Digital filters Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions Field programmable gate arrays Finite impulse response filter Intersymbol interference Multiaccess communication Multiple access interference Pulse shaping methods |
title | A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20prolate%20spheroidal%20and%20Gaussian%20FIR%20pulse%20shaping%20filters&rft.btitle=2008%20International%20Conference%20on%20Signals%20and%20Electronic%20Systems&rft.au=Jitsumatsu,%20Y.&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=343-346&rft.isbn=9788388309472&rft.isbn_list=8388309471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432&rft.eisbn=8388309528&rft.eisbn_list=9788388309526&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4673432%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4673432&rfr_iscdi=true |