Loading…

A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters

The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jitsumatsu, Y., Ogata, M., Kohda, T.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:eng ; jpn
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 346
container_issue
container_start_page 343
container_title
container_volume
creator Jitsumatsu, Y.
Ogata, M.
Kohda, T.
description The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_4673432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4673432</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4673432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMFKxDAYhCMiqGtfQC95gdb8SZsmx6XsroVFwdXz8rdJ3Ei3DU0X8e0t2LkM8zHMYQh5BJYBMP1cV4fNIeOMqSyXpcgFvyL3SiglmC64uiaJLtWS85LfkiTGbzZLaFlIuCOva9oO54Cjj0NPGzv9WNvTMA4dTpbGcLLj4A12FHtDd3iJ0WNPt_U7DZcuzo0TBt9_Uee7yY7xgdw4nHmy-Ip8bjcf1Uu6f9vV1XqfeihhSh2CMU7YpsgLDkYo6fKibRm0AAKt4VIqwxUrZdO6HBreas4RVGm1QtlosSJP_7veWnsMoz_j-HtcLhB_MDhQCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><description>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9788388309472</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 8388309471</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 8388309528</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9788388309526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Bit error rate ; Digital filters ; Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions ; Field programmable gate arrays ; Finite impulse response filter ; Intersymbol interference ; Multiaccess communication ; Multiple access interference ; Pulse shaping methods</subject><ispartof>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems, 2008, p.343-346</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4673432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4673432$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogata, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><title>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems</title><addtitle>ICSES</addtitle><description>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Bit error rate</subject><subject>Digital filters</subject><subject>Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions</subject><subject>Field programmable gate arrays</subject><subject>Finite impulse response filter</subject><subject>Intersymbol interference</subject><subject>Multiaccess communication</subject><subject>Multiple access interference</subject><subject>Pulse shaping methods</subject><isbn>9788388309472</isbn><isbn>8388309471</isbn><isbn>8388309528</isbn><isbn>9788388309526</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMFKxDAYhCMiqGtfQC95gdb8SZsmx6XsroVFwdXz8rdJ3Ei3DU0X8e0t2LkM8zHMYQh5BJYBMP1cV4fNIeOMqSyXpcgFvyL3SiglmC64uiaJLtWS85LfkiTGbzZLaFlIuCOva9oO54Cjj0NPGzv9WNvTMA4dTpbGcLLj4A12FHtDd3iJ0WNPt_U7DZcuzo0TBt9_Uee7yY7xgdw4nHmy-Ip8bjcf1Uu6f9vV1XqfeihhSh2CMU7YpsgLDkYo6fKibRm0AAKt4VIqwxUrZdO6HBreas4RVGm1QtlosSJP_7veWnsMoz_j-HtcLhB_MDhQCQ</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creator><creator>Ogata, M.</creator><creator>Kohda, T.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</title><author>Jitsumatsu, Y. ; Ogata, M. ; Kohda, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Bit error rate</topic><topic>Digital filters</topic><topic>Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions</topic><topic>Field programmable gate arrays</topic><topic>Finite impulse response filter</topic><topic>Intersymbol interference</topic><topic>Multiaccess communication</topic><topic>Multiple access interference</topic><topic>Pulse shaping methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jitsumatsu, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogata, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohda, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jitsumatsu, Y.</au><au>Ogata, M.</au><au>Kohda, T.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters</atitle><btitle>2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems</btitle><stitle>ICSES</stitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>343</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>343-346</pages><isbn>9788388309472</isbn><isbn>8388309471</isbn><eisbn>8388309528</eisbn><eisbn>9788388309526</eisbn><abstract>The performances of Slepianpsilas PSWF and Gaussian chip waveforms are compared in asynchronous CDMA systems, where Markov spreading codes are employed. Bit error rate of Gaussian and PSWF filters are significantly better than RRC filters. Implementation of the pulse shaping filters and Markov code generators by an FPGA will be reported at the conference.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9788388309472
ispartof 2008 International Conference on Signals and Electronic Systems, 2008, p.343-346
issn
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_4673432
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Bandwidth
Bit error rate
Digital filters
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
Field programmable gate arrays
Finite impulse response filter
Intersymbol interference
Multiaccess communication
Multiple access interference
Pulse shaping methods
title A comparison between prolate spheroidal and Gaussian FIR pulse shaping filters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20prolate%20spheroidal%20and%20Gaussian%20FIR%20pulse%20shaping%20filters&rft.btitle=2008%20International%20Conference%20on%20Signals%20and%20Electronic%20Systems&rft.au=Jitsumatsu,%20Y.&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=343-346&rft.isbn=9788388309472&rft.isbn_list=8388309471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICSES.2008.4673432&rft.eisbn=8388309528&rft.eisbn_list=9788388309526&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E4673432%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i171t-fa1ddf3eb54521d386f45cc01c113aed2668d28076bcf41b2c922a187e98a6b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4673432&rfr_iscdi=true