Loading…

Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications

Early P2P-TV systems have already attracted millions of users, and many new commercial solutions are entering this market. Little information is however available about how these systems work. In this paper we present large scale sets of experiments to compare three of the most successful P2P-TV sys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ciullo, D., Garcia, M.-A., Horvath, A., Leonardi, E., Mellia, M., Rossi, D., Telek, M., Veglia, P.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 7
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title
container_volume
creator Ciullo, D.
Garcia, M.-A.
Horvath, A.
Leonardi, E.
Mellia, M.
Rossi, D.
Telek, M.
Veglia, P.
description Early P2P-TV systems have already attracted millions of users, and many new commercial solutions are entering this market. Little information is however available about how these systems work. In this paper we present large scale sets of experiments to compare three of the most successful P2P-TV systems, namely PPLive, SopCast and TVAnts. Our goal is to assess what level of "network awareness" has been embedded in the applications, i.e., what parameters mainly drive the peer selection and data exchange. By using a general framework that can be extended to other systems and metrics, we show that all applications largely base their choices on the peer bandwidth, i.e., they prefer high-bandwidth users, which is rather intuitive. Moreover, TVAnts and PPLive exhibits also a preference to exchange data among peers in the same autonomous system the peer belongs to. However, no evidence about preference versus peers in the same subnet or that are closer to the considered peer emerges. We believe that next-generation P2P live streaming applications definitively need to improve the level of network-awareness, so to better localize the traffic in the network and thus increase their network-friendliness as well.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5160953
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5160953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5160953</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5160953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i1343-594abfbecb35ce08274aa4d89a8b396627fbe83fd8e229a80838c01d40edda913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj91Kw0AUhFdUsLR5Ab3ZF0g8-5fdvZT6VygaqF6Xk-REVtMkZIPFtzdgb5ybYb6BgWHsWkAmBPjbTXFf7DIJ4DMjcvBGnbHEWye01FpZA_r8Xxbigi2EUZBKsOaKJTF-wiw9o9wumH6h6diPXxyPOFJHMfK-4YUseBu-icdpJDyE7oPjMLShwin0XVyxywbbSMnJl-z98eFt_ZxuX58267ttGoTSKjVeY9mUVJXKVAROWo2oa-fRlcrnubRz6VRTO5JyhuCUq0DUGqiu0Qu1ZDd_u4GI9sMYDjj-7E-_1S_Clkjx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Ciullo, D. ; Garcia, M.-A. ; Horvath, A. ; Leonardi, E. ; Mellia, M. ; Rossi, D. ; Telek, M. ; Veglia, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciullo, D. ; Garcia, M.-A. ; Horvath, A. ; Leonardi, E. ; Mellia, M. ; Rossi, D. ; Telek, M. ; Veglia, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Early P2P-TV systems have already attracted millions of users, and many new commercial solutions are entering this market. Little information is however available about how these systems work. In this paper we present large scale sets of experiments to compare three of the most successful P2P-TV systems, namely PPLive, SopCast and TVAnts. Our goal is to assess what level of "network awareness" has been embedded in the applications, i.e., what parameters mainly drive the peer selection and data exchange. By using a general framework that can be extended to other systems and metrics, we show that all applications largely base their choices on the peer bandwidth, i.e., they prefer high-bandwidth users, which is rather intuitive. Moreover, TVAnts and PPLive exhibits also a preference to exchange data among peers in the same autonomous system the peer belongs to. However, no evidence about preference versus peers in the same subnet or that are closer to the considered peer emerges. We believe that next-generation P2P live streaming applications definitively need to improve the level of network-awareness, so to better localize the traffic in the network and thus increase their network-friendliness as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-2075</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424437511</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424437512</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424437504</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424437504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5160953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Character generation ; Large-scale systems ; Peer to peer computing ; Quality of service ; Scattering ; Stability ; Telecommunication traffic ; Testing ; Web and internet services</subject><ispartof>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel &amp; Distributed Processing, 2009, p.1-7</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5160953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5160953$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciullo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, M.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellia, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telek, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veglia, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications</title><title>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel &amp; Distributed Processing</title><addtitle>IPDPS</addtitle><description>Early P2P-TV systems have already attracted millions of users, and many new commercial solutions are entering this market. Little information is however available about how these systems work. In this paper we present large scale sets of experiments to compare three of the most successful P2P-TV systems, namely PPLive, SopCast and TVAnts. Our goal is to assess what level of "network awareness" has been embedded in the applications, i.e., what parameters mainly drive the peer selection and data exchange. By using a general framework that can be extended to other systems and metrics, we show that all applications largely base their choices on the peer bandwidth, i.e., they prefer high-bandwidth users, which is rather intuitive. Moreover, TVAnts and PPLive exhibits also a preference to exchange data among peers in the same autonomous system the peer belongs to. However, no evidence about preference versus peers in the same subnet or that are closer to the considered peer emerges. We believe that next-generation P2P live streaming applications definitively need to improve the level of network-awareness, so to better localize the traffic in the network and thus increase their network-friendliness as well.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Character generation</subject><subject>Large-scale systems</subject><subject>Peer to peer computing</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Telecommunication traffic</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Web and internet services</subject><issn>1530-2075</issn><isbn>9781424437511</isbn><isbn>1424437512</isbn><isbn>9781424437504</isbn><isbn>1424437504</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj91Kw0AUhFdUsLR5Ab3ZF0g8-5fdvZT6VygaqF6Xk-REVtMkZIPFtzdgb5ybYb6BgWHsWkAmBPjbTXFf7DIJ4DMjcvBGnbHEWye01FpZA_r8Xxbigi2EUZBKsOaKJTF-wiw9o9wumH6h6diPXxyPOFJHMfK-4YUseBu-icdpJDyE7oPjMLShwin0XVyxywbbSMnJl-z98eFt_ZxuX58267ttGoTSKjVeY9mUVJXKVAROWo2oa-fRlcrnubRz6VRTO5JyhuCUq0DUGqiu0Qu1ZDd_u4GI9sMYDjj-7E-_1S_Clkjx</recordid><startdate>200905</startdate><enddate>200905</enddate><creator>Ciullo, D.</creator><creator>Garcia, M.-A.</creator><creator>Horvath, A.</creator><creator>Leonardi, E.</creator><creator>Mellia, M.</creator><creator>Rossi, D.</creator><creator>Telek, M.</creator><creator>Veglia, P.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200905</creationdate><title>Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications</title><author>Ciullo, D. ; Garcia, M.-A. ; Horvath, A. ; Leonardi, E. ; Mellia, M. ; Rossi, D. ; Telek, M. ; Veglia, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1343-594abfbecb35ce08274aa4d89a8b396627fbe83fd8e229a80838c01d40edda913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Character generation</topic><topic>Large-scale systems</topic><topic>Peer to peer computing</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Telecommunication traffic</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Web and internet services</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciullo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, M.-A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonardi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellia, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telek, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veglia, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciullo, D.</au><au>Garcia, M.-A.</au><au>Horvath, A.</au><au>Leonardi, E.</au><au>Mellia, M.</au><au>Rossi, D.</au><au>Telek, M.</au><au>Veglia, P.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications</atitle><btitle>2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel &amp; Distributed Processing</btitle><stitle>IPDPS</stitle><date>2009-05</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>1530-2075</issn><isbn>9781424437511</isbn><isbn>1424437512</isbn><eisbn>9781424437504</eisbn><eisbn>1424437504</eisbn><abstract>Early P2P-TV systems have already attracted millions of users, and many new commercial solutions are entering this market. Little information is however available about how these systems work. In this paper we present large scale sets of experiments to compare three of the most successful P2P-TV systems, namely PPLive, SopCast and TVAnts. Our goal is to assess what level of "network awareness" has been embedded in the applications, i.e., what parameters mainly drive the peer selection and data exchange. By using a general framework that can be extended to other systems and metrics, we show that all applications largely base their choices on the peer bandwidth, i.e., they prefer high-bandwidth users, which is rather intuitive. Moreover, TVAnts and PPLive exhibits also a preference to exchange data among peers in the same autonomous system the peer belongs to. However, no evidence about preference versus peers in the same subnet or that are closer to the considered peer emerges. We believe that next-generation P2P live streaming applications definitively need to improve the level of network-awareness, so to better localize the traffic in the network and thus increase their network-friendliness as well.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5160953</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1530-2075
ispartof 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, 2009, p.1-7
issn 1530-2075
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5160953
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Bandwidth
Character generation
Large-scale systems
Peer to peer computing
Quality of service
Scattering
Stability
Telecommunication traffic
Testing
Web and internet services
title Network awareness of P2P live streaming applications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Network%20awareness%20of%20P2P%20live%20streaming%20applications&rft.btitle=2009%20IEEE%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Parallel%20&%20Distributed%20Processing&rft.au=Ciullo,%20D.&rft.date=2009-05&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=1530-2075&rft.isbn=9781424437511&rft.isbn_list=1424437512&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5160953&rft.eisbn=9781424437504&rft.eisbn_list=1424437504&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E5160953%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1343-594abfbecb35ce08274aa4d89a8b396627fbe83fd8e229a80838c01d40edda913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5160953&rfr_iscdi=true