Comparison of approaches to egomotion computation

• Main Authors: Tian, T.Y., Tomasi, C., Heeger, D.J.
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cameras; Computational modeling; Computer vision; Convergence of numerical methods; Layout; Motion estimation; Motion measurement; Psychology; Uniform resource locators; Web sites
• ISSN: 1063-6919
• DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.1996.517091

We evaluated six algorithms for computing egomotion from image velocities. We established benchmarks for quantifying bias and sensitivity to noise, and for quantifying the convergence properties of those algorithms that require numerical search. Our simulation results reveal some interesting and surprising results. First, it is often written in the literature that the egomotion problem is difficult because translation (e.g., along the X-axis) and rotation (e.g., about the Y-axis) produce similar image velocities. We found, to the contrary, that the bias and sensitivity of our six algorithms are totally invariant with respect to the axis of rotation. Second, it is also believed by some that fixating helps to make the egomotion problem easier: We found, to the contrary, that fixating does not help when the noise is independent of the image velocities. Fixation does help if the noise is proportional to speed, but this is only for the trivial reason that the speeds are slower under fixation. Third, it is widely believed that increasing the field of view will yield better performance. We found, to the contrary, that this is not necessarily true.