Loading…

Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment

The process of evaluating, classifying, and assigning bugs to programmers is a difficult and time consuming task which greatly depends on the quality of the bug report itself. It has been shown that the quality of reports originating from bug trackers or ticketing systems can vary significantly. In...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Schugerl, P., Rilling, J., Charland, P.
Format:	Conference Proceeding
Language:	English
Subjects:	Algorithm design and analysis Artificial intelligence Bug repositories Computer science Data mining Information retrieval Natural language processing ontologies Performance analysis Quality assessment Software engineering Text mining
Online Access:	Request full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page	1110
container_issue
container_start_page	1105
container_title
container_volume
creator	Schugerl, P. Rilling, J. Charland, P.
description	The process of evaluating, classifying, and assigning bugs to programmers is a difficult and time consuming task which greatly depends on the quality of the bug report itself. It has been shown that the quality of reports originating from bug trackers or ticketing systems can vary significantly. In this research, we apply information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques for mining bug repositories. We focus particularly on measuring the quality of the free form descriptions submitted as part of bug reports used by open source bug trackers. Properties of natural language influencing the report quality are automatically identified and applied as part of a classification task. The results from the automated quality assessment are used to populate and enrich our existing software engineering ontology to support a further analysis of the quality and maturity of bug trackers.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/CIMCA.2008.63
format	conference_proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5172780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5172780</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5172780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g235t-aa9798a8991db9569d0b094af968fc9a02b1f498858c80bccff9968b6272ba4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKw0AUQAdEUGqWrtzkBybeO--7jMFHoUUUXZeZdCaMtGnJpIv-vQVdncWBA4exe4QGEeixW667thEArjHyilVkHVhDWmpU4oZVpfwAAJKxiOqW8XUe8zjUT6eh_ozHQ8nzYcqxcN7WHye_y_O5bkuJpezjON-x6-R3JVb_XLDvl-ev7o2v3l-XXbvig5B65t6TJecdEW4DaUNbCEDKJzIu9eRBBEyKnNOudxD6PiW6qGCEFcGrJBfs4a-bY4yb45T3fjpvNFpxuZG_ccZANg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Schugerl, P. ; Rilling, J. ; Charland, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schugerl, P. ; Rilling, J. ; Charland, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The process of evaluating, classifying, and assigning bugs to programmers is a difficult and time consuming task which greatly depends on the quality of the bug report itself. It has been shown that the quality of reports originating from bug trackers or ticketing systems can vary significantly. In this research, we apply information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques for mining bug repositories. We focus particularly on measuring the quality of the free form descriptions submitted as part of bug reports used by open source bug trackers. Properties of natural language influencing the report quality are automatically identified and applied as part of a classification task. The results from the automated quality assessment are used to populate and enrich our existing software engineering ontology to support a further analysis of the quality and maturity of bug trackers.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780769535142</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769535143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CIMCA.2008.63</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithm design and analysis ; Artificial intelligence ; Bug repositories ; Computer science ; Data mining ; Information retrieval ; Natural language processing ; ontologies ; Performance analysis ; Quality assessment ; Software engineering ; Text mining</subject><ispartof>2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation, 2008, p.1105-1110</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5172780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5172780$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schugerl, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rilling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charland, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment</title><title>2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation</title><addtitle>CIMCA</addtitle><description>The process of evaluating, classifying, and assigning bugs to programmers is a difficult and time consuming task which greatly depends on the quality of the bug report itself. It has been shown that the quality of reports originating from bug trackers or ticketing systems can vary significantly. In this research, we apply information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques for mining bug repositories. We focus particularly on measuring the quality of the free form descriptions submitted as part of bug reports used by open source bug trackers. Properties of natural language influencing the report quality are automatically identified and applied as part of a classification task. The results from the automated quality assessment are used to populate and enrich our existing software engineering ontology to support a further analysis of the quality and maturity of bug trackers.</description><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bug repositories</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Information retrieval</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>ontologies</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Text mining</subject><isbn>9780769535142</isbn><isbn>0769535143</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKw0AUQAdEUGqWrtzkBybeO--7jMFHoUUUXZeZdCaMtGnJpIv-vQVdncWBA4exe4QGEeixW667thEArjHyilVkHVhDWmpU4oZVpfwAAJKxiOqW8XUe8zjUT6eh_ozHQ8nzYcqxcN7WHye_y_O5bkuJpezjON-x6-R3JVb_XLDvl-ev7o2v3l-XXbvig5B65t6TJecdEW4DaUNbCEDKJzIu9eRBBEyKnNOudxD6PiW6qGCEFcGrJBfs4a-bY4yb45T3fjpvNFpxuZG_ccZANg</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Schugerl, P.</creator><creator>Rilling, J.</creator><creator>Charland, P.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment</title><author>Schugerl, P. ; Rilling, J. ; Charland, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g235t-aa9798a8991db9569d0b094af968fc9a02b1f498858c80bccff9968b6272ba4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bug repositories</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Information retrieval</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>ontologies</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Text mining</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schugerl, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rilling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charland, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schugerl, P.</au><au>Rilling, J.</au><au>Charland, P.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment</atitle><btitle>2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation</btitle><stitle>CIMCA</stitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><spage>1105</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1105-1110</pages><isbn>9780769535142</isbn><isbn>0769535143</isbn><abstract>The process of evaluating, classifying, and assigning bugs to programmers is a difficult and time consuming task which greatly depends on the quality of the bug report itself. It has been shown that the quality of reports originating from bug trackers or ticketing systems can vary significantly. In this research, we apply information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques for mining bug repositories. We focus particularly on measuring the quality of the free form descriptions submitted as part of bug reports used by open source bug trackers. Properties of natural language influencing the report quality are automatically identified and applied as part of a classification task. The results from the automated quality assessment are used to populate and enrich our existing software engineering ontology to support a further analysis of the quality and maturity of bug trackers.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CIMCA.2008.63</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISBN: 9780769535142
ispartof	2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation, 2008, p.1105-1110
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_5172780
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Algorithm design and analysis Artificial intelligence Bug repositories Computer science Data mining Information retrieval Natural language processing ontologies Performance analysis Quality assessment Software engineering Text mining
title	Mining Bug Repositories--A Quality Assessment
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A03%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Mining%20Bug%20Repositories--A%20Quality%20Assessment&rft.btitle=2008%20International%20Conference%20on%20Computational%20Intelligence%20for%20Modelling%20Control%20&%20Automation&rft.au=Schugerl,%20P.&rft.date=2008-12&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1105-1110&rft.isbn=9780769535142&rft.isbn_list=0769535143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CIMCA.2008.63&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5172780%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g235t-aa9798a8991db9569d0b094af968fc9a02b1f498858c80bccff9968b6272ba4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5172780&rfr_iscdi=true