Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study

The need for design primitives for scientific workflows has steadily increased over the years and, actually, has become more pronounced in recent years, with the employment of user-friendly scientific workflow management systems. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study between business and sci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yildiz, U., Guabtni, A., Ngu, A.H.H.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Availability
Concrete
Concurrent computing
Counting circuits
Data flow computing
Employment
Runtime
Scientific Workflow Management
Workflow management software
Workflow Patterns
Yarn
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 343
container_issue
container_start_page 340
container_title
container_volume
creator Yildiz, U.
Guabtni, A.
Ngu, A.H.H.
description The need for design primitives for scientific workflows has steadily increased over the years and, actually, has become more pronounced in recent years, with the employment of user-friendly scientific workflow management systems. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study between business and scientific workflows initiatives based on common workflow patterns found in business workflow. This study demonstrates some precise differences and identifies some key scientific workflow patterns that can be used in dataflow oriented scientific workflow systems without compromising the data-oriented modeling in scientific workflow.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.60
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5190642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5190642</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5190642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b07c69b8120e7354e010805a68eba85dfa8cb91e4b87655432988ddd4dfbb5493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKw0AUANARFKy1P6Cb_EDivZnXHXc1tBooCMbHssxkJjDYNiWTVPr3LnR1doexO4QCEcxDs3r7rKtVk9dFCWAKBRfsBrQykmsgvGSzkmvKOSFds0VK0QFK4qiFmDHzNKV4CCllpzCkKWVNG8NhjF1ss69--O52_U96zJZZ1e-PdrBjPIWsGSd_vmVXnd2lsPh3zj7Wq_fqJd-8PtfVcpNH1HLMHehWGUdYQtBcigAIBNIqCs6S9J2l1hkMwpFWUgpeGiLvvfCdc1IYPmf3f28MIWyPQ9zb4byVaECJkv8CXoNHvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Yildiz, U. ; Guabtni, A. ; Ngu, A.H.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, U. ; Guabtni, A. ; Ngu, A.H.H.</creatorcontrib><description>The need for design primitives for scientific workflows has steadily increased over the years and, actually, has become more pronounced in recent years, with the employment of user-friendly scientific workflow management systems. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study between business and scientific workflows initiatives based on common workflow patterns found in business workflow. This study demonstrates some precise differences and identifies some key scientific workflow patterns that can be used in dataflow oriented scientific workflow systems without compromising the data-oriented modeling in scientific workflow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2378-3818</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 0769537081</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9780769537085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Availability ; Concrete ; Concurrent computing ; Counting circuits ; Data flow computing ; Employment ; Runtime ; Scientific Workflow Management ; Workflow management software ; Workflow Patterns ; Yarn</subject><ispartof>2009 Congress on Services - I, 2009, p.340-343</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5190642$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5190642$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guabtni, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngu, A.H.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study</title><title>2009 Congress on Services - I</title><addtitle>SERVICES-1</addtitle><description>The need for design primitives for scientific workflows has steadily increased over the years and, actually, has become more pronounced in recent years, with the employment of user-friendly scientific workflow management systems. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study between business and scientific workflows initiatives based on common workflow patterns found in business workflow. This study demonstrates some precise differences and identifies some key scientific workflow patterns that can be used in dataflow oriented scientific workflow systems without compromising the data-oriented modeling in scientific workflow.</description><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concurrent computing</subject><subject>Counting circuits</subject><subject>Data flow computing</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Scientific Workflow Management</subject><subject>Workflow management software</subject><subject>Workflow Patterns</subject><subject>Yarn</subject><issn>2378-3818</issn><isbn>0769537081</isbn><isbn>9780769537085</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotzMtKw0AUANARFKy1P6Cb_EDivZnXHXc1tBooCMbHssxkJjDYNiWTVPr3LnR1doexO4QCEcxDs3r7rKtVk9dFCWAKBRfsBrQykmsgvGSzkmvKOSFds0VK0QFK4qiFmDHzNKV4CCllpzCkKWVNG8NhjF1ss69--O52_U96zJZZ1e-PdrBjPIWsGSd_vmVXnd2lsPh3zj7Wq_fqJd-8PtfVcpNH1HLMHehWGUdYQtBcigAIBNIqCs6S9J2l1hkMwpFWUgpeGiLvvfCdc1IYPmf3f28MIWyPQ9zb4byVaECJkv8CXoNHvQ</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Yildiz, U.</creator><creator>Guabtni, A.</creator><creator>Ngu, A.H.H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study</title><author>Yildiz, U. ; Guabtni, A. ; Ngu, A.H.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b07c69b8120e7354e010805a68eba85dfa8cb91e4b87655432988ddd4dfbb5493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concurrent computing</topic><topic>Counting circuits</topic><topic>Data flow computing</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Scientific Workflow Management</topic><topic>Workflow management software</topic><topic>Workflow Patterns</topic><topic>Yarn</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guabtni, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngu, A.H.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildiz, U.</au><au>Guabtni, A.</au><au>Ngu, A.H.H.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study</atitle><btitle>2009 Congress on Services - I</btitle><stitle>SERVICES-1</stitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>340</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>340-343</pages><issn>2378-3818</issn><eisbn>0769537081</eisbn><eisbn>9780769537085</eisbn><abstract>The need for design primitives for scientific workflows has steadily increased over the years and, actually, has become more pronounced in recent years, with the employment of user-friendly scientific workflow management systems. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study between business and scientific workflows initiatives based on common workflow patterns found in business workflow. This study demonstrates some precise differences and identifies some key scientific workflow patterns that can be used in dataflow oriented scientific workflow systems without compromising the data-oriented modeling in scientific workflow.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.60</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2378-3818
ispartof 2009 Congress on Services - I, 2009, p.340-343
issn 2378-3818
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5190642
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Availability
Concrete
Concurrent computing
Counting circuits
Data flow computing
Employment
Runtime
Scientific Workflow Management
Workflow management software
Workflow Patterns
Yarn
title Business versus Scientific Workflows: A Comparative Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Business%20versus%20Scientific%20Workflows:%20A%20Comparative%20Study&rft.btitle=2009%20Congress%20on%20Services%20-%20I&rft.au=Yildiz,%20U.&rft.date=2009-07&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=340-343&rft.issn=2378-3818&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.60&rft.eisbn=0769537081&rft.eisbn_list=9780769537085&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E5190642%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-b07c69b8120e7354e010805a68eba85dfa8cb91e4b87655432988ddd4dfbb5493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5190642&rfr_iscdi=true