Loading…

Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and

Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505
Main Authors: Swiderski, L., Moszynski, M., Nassalski, A., Syntfeld-Kazuch, A., Szczesniak, T., Kamada, K., Tsutsumi, K., Usuki, Y., Yanagida, T., Yoshikawa, A., Chewpraditkul, W., Pomorski, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3
container_end_page 2505
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2499
container_title IEEE transactions on nuclear science
container_volume 56
creator Swiderski, L.
Moszynski, M.
Nassalski, A.
Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.
Szczesniak, T.
Kamada, K.
Tsutsumi, K.
Usuki, Y.
Yanagida, T.
Yoshikawa, A.
Chewpraditkul, W.
Pomorski, M.
description Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5204758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5204758</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>36351941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvw4MnOl6RZk-OYOoXihM1zSNtUMtamJu1h_70ZG4pe3uPx_b7Hx4fQNYEJISAf1m-rCQWQcVAOKZygEeFcJIRn4hSNAIhIZCrlOboIYRPPlAMfoc9Vadvebre6t67F7951xvfWBOzqeOlgXLVr7NDgx6hUOB9mC_zrcR7PXdNpH6Xe4bnxf9F7nK-WWLfVJTqr9TaYq-Meo4_np_X8JcmXi9f5LE9KyihJaM2yotZSm5JOJeiCGKAVqwQpi4IVkDKmhciIrKus4lJWDKalkDor0oyTomZjdHf423n3NZjQq8aG0sSsrXFDUGzKOJEpieDtP3DjBt_GbEoSCoTTjEcIDlDpXQje1KrzttF-pwiofe0q1q72tatj7dFyc7BYY8wPzinEgIJ9AzdqfWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912015275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Cerium ; Crystals ; Decay time constant ; Energy measurement ; Energy resolution ; Garnets ; Lanthanum ; LSO ; LuAG ; non-proportionality ; Pulse measurements ; Shape measurement ; Time measurement ; time resolution</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5204758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moszynski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassalski, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamada, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsumi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usuki, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagida, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chewpraditkul, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Cerium</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Decay time constant</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Energy resolution</subject><subject>Garnets</subject><subject>Lanthanum</subject><subject>LSO</subject><subject>LuAG</subject><subject>non-proportionality</subject><subject>Pulse measurements</subject><subject>Shape measurement</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>time resolution</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvw4MnOl6RZk-OYOoXihM1zSNtUMtamJu1h_70ZG4pe3uPx_b7Hx4fQNYEJISAf1m-rCQWQcVAOKZygEeFcJIRn4hSNAIhIZCrlOboIYRPPlAMfoc9Vadvebre6t67F7951xvfWBOzqeOlgXLVr7NDgx6hUOB9mC_zrcR7PXdNpH6Xe4bnxf9F7nK-WWLfVJTqr9TaYq-Meo4_np_X8JcmXi9f5LE9KyihJaM2yotZSm5JOJeiCGKAVqwQpi4IVkDKmhciIrKus4lJWDKalkDor0oyTomZjdHf423n3NZjQq8aG0sSsrXFDUGzKOJEpieDtP3DjBt_GbEoSCoTTjEcIDlDpXQje1KrzttF-pwiofe0q1q72tatj7dFyc7BYY8wPzinEgIJ9AzdqfWg</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Swiderski, L.</creator><creator>Moszynski, M.</creator><creator>Nassalski, A.</creator><creator>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creator><creator>Szczesniak, T.</creator><creator>Kamada, K.</creator><creator>Tsutsumi, K.</creator><creator>Usuki, Y.</creator><creator>Yanagida, T.</creator><creator>Yoshikawa, A.</creator><creator>Chewpraditkul, W.</creator><creator>Pomorski, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><author>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Cerium</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Decay time constant</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Energy resolution</topic><topic>Garnets</topic><topic>Lanthanum</topic><topic>LSO</topic><topic>LuAG</topic><topic>non-proportionality</topic><topic>Pulse measurements</topic><topic>Shape measurement</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>time resolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moszynski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassalski, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamada, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsumi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usuki, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagida, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chewpraditkul, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swiderski, L.</au><au>Moszynski, M.</au><au>Nassalski, A.</au><au>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</au><au>Szczesniak, T.</au><au>Kamada, K.</au><au>Tsutsumi, K.</au><au>Usuki, Y.</au><au>Yanagida, T.</au><au>Yoshikawa, A.</au><au>Chewpraditkul, W.</au><au>Pomorski, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2499</spage><epage>2505</epage><pages>2499-2505</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9499
ispartof IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505
issn 0018-9499
1558-1578
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5204758
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Aluminum
Cerium
Crystals
Decay time constant
Energy measurement
Energy resolution
Garnets
Lanthanum
LSO
LuAG
non-proportionality
Pulse measurements
Shape measurement
Time measurement
time resolution
title Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A21%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scintillation%20Properties%20of%20Praseodymium%20Doped%20LuAG%20Scintillator%20Compared%20to%20Cerium%20Doped%20LuAG,%20LSO%20and&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Swiderski,%20L.&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2499&rft.epage=2505&rft.pages=2499-2505&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E36351941%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912015275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5204758&rfr_iscdi=true