Loading…
Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and
Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of t...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3 |
container_end_page | 2505 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2499 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on nuclear science |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Swiderski, L. Moszynski, M. Nassalski, A. Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. Szczesniak, T. Kamada, K. Tsutsumi, K. Usuki, Y. Yanagida, T. Yoshikawa, A. Chewpraditkul, W. Pomorski, M. |
description | Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5204758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5204758</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>36351941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvw4MnOl6RZk-OYOoXihM1zSNtUMtamJu1h_70ZG4pe3uPx_b7Hx4fQNYEJISAf1m-rCQWQcVAOKZygEeFcJIRn4hSNAIhIZCrlOboIYRPPlAMfoc9Vadvebre6t67F7951xvfWBOzqeOlgXLVr7NDgx6hUOB9mC_zrcR7PXdNpH6Xe4bnxf9F7nK-WWLfVJTqr9TaYq-Meo4_np_X8JcmXi9f5LE9KyihJaM2yotZSm5JOJeiCGKAVqwQpi4IVkDKmhciIrKus4lJWDKalkDor0oyTomZjdHf423n3NZjQq8aG0sSsrXFDUGzKOJEpieDtP3DjBt_GbEoSCoTTjEcIDlDpXQje1KrzttF-pwiofe0q1q72tatj7dFyc7BYY8wPzinEgIJ9AzdqfWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>912015275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Cerium ; Crystals ; Decay time constant ; Energy measurement ; Energy resolution ; Garnets ; Lanthanum ; LSO ; LuAG ; non-proportionality ; Pulse measurements ; Shape measurement ; Time measurement ; time resolution</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5204758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moszynski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassalski, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamada, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsumi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usuki, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagida, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chewpraditkul, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Cerium</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Decay time constant</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Energy resolution</subject><subject>Garnets</subject><subject>Lanthanum</subject><subject>LSO</subject><subject>LuAG</subject><subject>non-proportionality</subject><subject>Pulse measurements</subject><subject>Shape measurement</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>time resolution</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3wUvw4MnOl6RZk-OYOoXihM1zSNtUMtamJu1h_70ZG4pe3uPx_b7Hx4fQNYEJISAf1m-rCQWQcVAOKZygEeFcJIRn4hSNAIhIZCrlOboIYRPPlAMfoc9Vadvebre6t67F7951xvfWBOzqeOlgXLVr7NDgx6hUOB9mC_zrcR7PXdNpH6Xe4bnxf9F7nK-WWLfVJTqr9TaYq-Meo4_np_X8JcmXi9f5LE9KyihJaM2yotZSm5JOJeiCGKAVqwQpi4IVkDKmhciIrKus4lJWDKalkDor0oyTomZjdHf423n3NZjQq8aG0sSsrXFDUGzKOJEpieDtP3DjBt_GbEoSCoTTjEcIDlDpXQje1KrzttF-pwiofe0q1q72tatj7dFyc7BYY8wPzinEgIJ9AzdqfWg</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Swiderski, L.</creator><creator>Moszynski, M.</creator><creator>Nassalski, A.</creator><creator>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creator><creator>Szczesniak, T.</creator><creator>Kamada, K.</creator><creator>Tsutsumi, K.</creator><creator>Usuki, Y.</creator><creator>Yanagida, T.</creator><creator>Yoshikawa, A.</creator><creator>Chewpraditkul, W.</creator><creator>Pomorski, M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</title><author>Swiderski, L. ; Moszynski, M. ; Nassalski, A. ; Syntfeld-Kazuch, A. ; Szczesniak, T. ; Kamada, K. ; Tsutsumi, K. ; Usuki, Y. ; Yanagida, T. ; Yoshikawa, A. ; Chewpraditkul, W. ; Pomorski, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Cerium</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Decay time constant</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Energy resolution</topic><topic>Garnets</topic><topic>Lanthanum</topic><topic>LSO</topic><topic>LuAG</topic><topic>non-proportionality</topic><topic>Pulse measurements</topic><topic>Shape measurement</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>time resolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swiderski, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moszynski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassalski, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczesniak, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamada, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsutsumi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usuki, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagida, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chewpraditkul, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomorski, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swiderski, L.</au><au>Moszynski, M.</au><au>Nassalski, A.</au><au>Syntfeld-Kazuch, A.</au><au>Szczesniak, T.</au><au>Kamada, K.</au><au>Tsutsumi, K.</au><au>Usuki, Y.</au><au>Yanagida, T.</au><au>Yoshikawa, A.</au><au>Chewpraditkul, W.</au><au>Pomorski, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2499</spage><epage>2505</epage><pages>2499-2505</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>Properties of praseodymium and cerium doped Lutetium Aluminum Garnet (LuAG) were compared with cerium doped Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (LSO) and Lanthanum Bromide (LaBr 3 ). Light yield, its non-proportionality relative to 662 keV gamma -rays and the dependence of the energy resolution on energy of the detected gamma -rays were measured. LuAG:Pr turned out to have good proportionality, with deviation from unity around 10% at 16.6 keV and 3% at 59.5 keV. This, together with relatively high light yield of 5600 phe/MeV results in a very good energy resolution of LuAG:Pr of 5.1% measured with 662 keV gamma-rays. The measured time resolution of 308 ps is significantly larger than that of 166 ps obtained for LSO:Ce. This can be explained by smaller light yield of LuAG:Pr and the fact that only about 25% of its scintillation is emitted in short decay time modes of 17.6 ns and 52 ns, while the rest is decaying with long time modes of 1.4 mus and 9 mus.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9499 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2009-08, Vol.56 (4), p.2499-2505 |
issn | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5204758 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Aluminum Cerium Crystals Decay time constant Energy measurement Energy resolution Garnets Lanthanum LSO LuAG non-proportionality Pulse measurements Shape measurement Time measurement time resolution |
title | Scintillation Properties of Praseodymium Doped LuAG Scintillator Compared to Cerium Doped LuAG, LSO and |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A21%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scintillation%20Properties%20of%20Praseodymium%20Doped%20LuAG%20Scintillator%20Compared%20to%20Cerium%20Doped%20LuAG,%20LSO%20and&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Swiderski,%20L.&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2499&rft.epage=2505&rft.pages=2499-2505&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNS.2009.2025040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E36351941%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2321-2f37bfa9aec2690ab1e02d3d81cbb3b0433a88719fd7d599d306c89a7b4751bf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=912015275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5204758&rfr_iscdi=true |