Loading…

Template phenology for vegetation models

To assist the representation of phenology in vegetation models we created several templates of phenology-driver relations by characterizing the annual phase differences between phenology and two phenology drivers. We did this using the results of a cross spectral analysis of MODIS EVI with radiation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley, Andrew, Gerard, France, Barbier, Nicolas, Weedon, Graham, Huntingford, Chris, Zelazowski, Przemyslaw, Anderson, Liana, de Aragao, Luiz, Kaduk, Jorg
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page IV-1045
container_issue
container_start_page IV-1042
container_title
container_volume 4
creator Bradley, Andrew
Gerard, France
Barbier, Nicolas
Weedon, Graham
Huntingford, Chris
Zelazowski, Przemyslaw
Anderson, Liana
de Aragao, Luiz
Kaduk, Jorg
description To assist the representation of phenology in vegetation models we created several templates of phenology-driver relations by characterizing the annual phase differences between phenology and two phenology drivers. We did this using the results of a cross spectral analysis of MODIS EVI with radiation (CPTEC) and with precipitation (TRMM). Four phase ranges were identified for phenology-radiation and three phase ranges for phenology-precipitation. These ranges were classified and mapped together into 12 zones of our study area where particular phase relationships coincided. Around ~25% area was in phase with radiation, with varying phase ranges of precipitation, and ~16 % was in phase with precipitation with varying phase ranges of radiation. For each zone we conceptualized the phenology-driver relationships with phase lagged curves. The phase timing of these plots matched well with average time series plots from the same zones, but more work is needed on the representation of amplitude.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417570
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5417570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5417570</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5417570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8a30572a05405f7b1d39e0efb29b342a114c0cfbe804d1664f82b383f2e0b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj09rwkAUxLd_hKr1E3jJsZekb_e9zWaPItUKQqHxLrvmrU1JTDCh4LdvoIHOZWB-MMwIsZSQSAn2dbddfeZ5ogBsokkabeBOzCQpIkSr7b2YKqkxNgD48A8IHkeQWptOxGwoyKyEIXoSi677hkGkISUzFS8HrtvK9Ry1X3xpquZ8i0JzjX74zL3ry-YS1U3BVfcsJsFVHS9Gn4t883ZYv8f7j-1uvdrH5TCwjzOHoI1yoAl0MF4WaBk4eGU9knJS0glOwXMGVMg0pZApjxkGxeAR52L511oy87G9lrW73o7jefwFnFlGig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Template phenology for vegetation models</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Bradley, Andrew ; Gerard, France ; Barbier, Nicolas ; Weedon, Graham ; Huntingford, Chris ; Zelazowski, Przemyslaw ; Anderson, Liana ; de Aragao, Luiz ; Kaduk, Jorg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Andrew ; Gerard, France ; Barbier, Nicolas ; Weedon, Graham ; Huntingford, Chris ; Zelazowski, Przemyslaw ; Anderson, Liana ; de Aragao, Luiz ; Kaduk, Jorg</creatorcontrib><description>To assist the representation of phenology in vegetation models we created several templates of phenology-driver relations by characterizing the annual phase differences between phenology and two phenology drivers. We did this using the results of a cross spectral analysis of MODIS EVI with radiation (CPTEC) and with precipitation (TRMM). Four phase ranges were identified for phenology-radiation and three phase ranges for phenology-precipitation. These ranges were classified and mapped together into 12 zones of our study area where particular phase relationships coincided. Around ~25% area was in phase with radiation, with varying phase ranges of precipitation, and ~16 % was in phase with precipitation with varying phase ranges of radiation. For each zone we conceptualized the phenology-driver relationships with phase lagged curves. The phase timing of these plots matched well with average time series plots from the same zones, but more work is needed on the representation of amplitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2153-6996</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424433940</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424433940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-7003</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424433959</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424433957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417570</identifier><identifier>LCCN: 2008910215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Atmospheric modeling ; Biological system modeling ; Discrete event simulation ; Fourier transform ; modeling ; MODIS ; Productivity ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Satellite applications ; Spectral analysis ; Timing ; Vegetation mapping</subject><ispartof>2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2009, Vol.4, p.IV-1042-IV-1045</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5417570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5417570$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weedon, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntingford, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelazowski, Przemyslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aragao, Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaduk, Jorg</creatorcontrib><title>Template phenology for vegetation models</title><title>2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium</title><addtitle>IGARSS</addtitle><description>To assist the representation of phenology in vegetation models we created several templates of phenology-driver relations by characterizing the annual phase differences between phenology and two phenology drivers. We did this using the results of a cross spectral analysis of MODIS EVI with radiation (CPTEC) and with precipitation (TRMM). Four phase ranges were identified for phenology-radiation and three phase ranges for phenology-precipitation. These ranges were classified and mapped together into 12 zones of our study area where particular phase relationships coincided. Around ~25% area was in phase with radiation, with varying phase ranges of precipitation, and ~16 % was in phase with precipitation with varying phase ranges of radiation. For each zone we conceptualized the phenology-driver relationships with phase lagged curves. The phase timing of these plots matched well with average time series plots from the same zones, but more work is needed on the representation of amplitude.</description><subject>Atmospheric modeling</subject><subject>Biological system modeling</subject><subject>Discrete event simulation</subject><subject>Fourier transform</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellite applications</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Timing</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><issn>2153-6996</issn><issn>2153-7003</issn><isbn>1424433940</isbn><isbn>9781424433940</isbn><isbn>1424433959</isbn><isbn>9781424433957</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj09rwkAUxLd_hKr1E3jJsZekb_e9zWaPItUKQqHxLrvmrU1JTDCh4LdvoIHOZWB-MMwIsZSQSAn2dbddfeZ5ogBsokkabeBOzCQpIkSr7b2YKqkxNgD48A8IHkeQWptOxGwoyKyEIXoSi677hkGkISUzFS8HrtvK9Ry1X3xpquZ8i0JzjX74zL3ry-YS1U3BVfcsJsFVHS9Gn4t883ZYv8f7j-1uvdrH5TCwjzOHoI1yoAl0MF4WaBk4eGU9knJS0glOwXMGVMg0pZApjxkGxeAR52L511oy87G9lrW73o7jefwFnFlGig</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Bradley, Andrew</creator><creator>Gerard, France</creator><creator>Barbier, Nicolas</creator><creator>Weedon, Graham</creator><creator>Huntingford, Chris</creator><creator>Zelazowski, Przemyslaw</creator><creator>Anderson, Liana</creator><creator>de Aragao, Luiz</creator><creator>Kaduk, Jorg</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Template phenology for vegetation models</title><author>Bradley, Andrew ; Gerard, France ; Barbier, Nicolas ; Weedon, Graham ; Huntingford, Chris ; Zelazowski, Przemyslaw ; Anderson, Liana ; de Aragao, Luiz ; Kaduk, Jorg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8a30572a05405f7b1d39e0efb29b342a114c0cfbe804d1664f82b383f2e0b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric modeling</topic><topic>Biological system modeling</topic><topic>Discrete event simulation</topic><topic>Fourier transform</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellite applications</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Timing</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, France</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weedon, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntingford, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelazowski, Przemyslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aragao, Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaduk, Jorg</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Andrew</au><au>Gerard, France</au><au>Barbier, Nicolas</au><au>Weedon, Graham</au><au>Huntingford, Chris</au><au>Zelazowski, Przemyslaw</au><au>Anderson, Liana</au><au>de Aragao, Luiz</au><au>Kaduk, Jorg</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Template phenology for vegetation models</atitle><btitle>2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium</btitle><stitle>IGARSS</stitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>IV-1042</spage><epage>IV-1045</epage><pages>IV-1042-IV-1045</pages><issn>2153-6996</issn><eissn>2153-7003</eissn><isbn>1424433940</isbn><isbn>9781424433940</isbn><eisbn>1424433959</eisbn><eisbn>9781424433957</eisbn><abstract>To assist the representation of phenology in vegetation models we created several templates of phenology-driver relations by characterizing the annual phase differences between phenology and two phenology drivers. We did this using the results of a cross spectral analysis of MODIS EVI with radiation (CPTEC) and with precipitation (TRMM). Four phase ranges were identified for phenology-radiation and three phase ranges for phenology-precipitation. These ranges were classified and mapped together into 12 zones of our study area where particular phase relationships coincided. Around ~25% area was in phase with radiation, with varying phase ranges of precipitation, and ~16 % was in phase with precipitation with varying phase ranges of radiation. For each zone we conceptualized the phenology-driver relationships with phase lagged curves. The phase timing of these plots matched well with average time series plots from the same zones, but more work is needed on the representation of amplitude.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417570</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2153-6996
ispartof 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2009, Vol.4, p.IV-1042-IV-1045
issn 2153-6996
2153-7003
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5417570
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Atmospheric modeling
Biological system modeling
Discrete event simulation
Fourier transform
modeling
MODIS
Productivity
Remote monitoring
Remote sensing
Satellite applications
Spectral analysis
Timing
Vegetation mapping
title Template phenology for vegetation models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A04%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Template%20phenology%20for%20vegetation%20models&rft.btitle=2009%20IEEE%20International%20Geoscience%20and%20Remote%20Sensing%20Symposium&rft.au=Bradley,%20Andrew&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=IV-1042&rft.epage=IV-1045&rft.pages=IV-1042-IV-1045&rft.issn=2153-6996&rft.eissn=2153-7003&rft.isbn=1424433940&rft.isbn_list=9781424433940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417570&rft.eisbn=1424433959&rft.eisbn_list=9781424433957&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E5417570%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8a30572a05405f7b1d39e0efb29b342a114c0cfbe804d1664f82b383f2e0b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5417570&rfr_iscdi=true