Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder

Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swaroop, K V Suchethan, Rao, K R
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Codecs
Decoding
H.264/AVC
IEC
Intel IPP H.264
ISO
JM 15.1
Performance analysis
Performance comparison
PSNR
Signal to noise ratio
Software libraries
Video coding
Video compression
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.
ISSN:0094-2898
2161-8135
DOI:10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807