Loading…

Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder

Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swaroop, K V Suchethan, Rao, K R
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 375
container_issue
container_start_page 371
container_title
container_volume
creator Swaroop, K V Suchethan
Rao, K R
description Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5442807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5442807</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5442807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtuwjAURN2X1ED5gKob_0DSe_2I7WWFSqGiKlJot8jY11IqSFDChr9vROlqZnRGsxjGHhEKRHDPVVWtCwFD1EoJC-aKTZyxqIRSunRor1kmsMTcotQ3bPQPwN6yDMCpXFhn79mo738AoCyFztj3irrUdnvfBOK-8btTX_eDiTy0-4Pv6r5teJv4-wdHXeCZLJoj7fhiteLzQpSKUxPaSN2ZRTr7B3aX_K6nyUXH7Gv2up7O8-Xn22L6ssxrNPqYh-AxuSiCNUQmbsFLFQ2ikT4Z68gTBTBOxBCTtHIbh7JOGqwkr6NVcsye_nZrItocunrvu9Pm8o_8BShwVCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</creator><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><description>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG &amp; ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2898</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424456908</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424456901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-8135</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456918</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424456916</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456925</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424456924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Codecs ; Decoding ; H.264/AVC ; IEC ; Intel IPP H.264 ; ISO ; JM 15.1 ; Performance analysis ; Performance comparison ; PSNR ; Signal to noise ratio ; Software libraries ; Video coding ; Video compression</subject><ispartof>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST), 2010, p.371-375</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5442807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5442807$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><title>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)</title><addtitle>SSST</addtitle><description>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG &amp; ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</description><subject>Codecs</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>H.264/AVC</subject><subject>IEC</subject><subject>Intel IPP H.264</subject><subject>ISO</subject><subject>JM 15.1</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance comparison</subject><subject>PSNR</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Software libraries</subject><subject>Video coding</subject><subject>Video compression</subject><issn>0094-2898</issn><issn>2161-8135</issn><isbn>1424456908</isbn><isbn>9781424456901</isbn><isbn>9781424456918</isbn><isbn>1424456916</isbn><isbn>9781424456925</isbn><isbn>1424456924</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtuwjAURN2X1ED5gKob_0DSe_2I7WWFSqGiKlJot8jY11IqSFDChr9vROlqZnRGsxjGHhEKRHDPVVWtCwFD1EoJC-aKTZyxqIRSunRor1kmsMTcotQ3bPQPwN6yDMCpXFhn79mo738AoCyFztj3irrUdnvfBOK-8btTX_eDiTy0-4Pv6r5teJv4-wdHXeCZLJoj7fhiteLzQpSKUxPaSN2ZRTr7B3aX_K6nyUXH7Gv2up7O8-Xn22L6ssxrNPqYh-AxuSiCNUQmbsFLFQ2ikT4Z68gTBTBOxBCTtHIbh7JOGqwkr6NVcsye_nZrItocunrvu9Pm8o_8BShwVCk</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creator><creator>Rao, K R</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><author>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Codecs</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>H.264/AVC</topic><topic>IEC</topic><topic>Intel IPP H.264</topic><topic>ISO</topic><topic>JM 15.1</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance comparison</topic><topic>PSNR</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Software libraries</topic><topic>Video coding</topic><topic>Video compression</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</au><au>Rao, K R</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</atitle><btitle>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)</btitle><stitle>SSST</stitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>371</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>371-375</pages><issn>0094-2898</issn><eissn>2161-8135</eissn><isbn>1424456908</isbn><isbn>9781424456901</isbn><eisbn>9781424456918</eisbn><eisbn>1424456916</eisbn><eisbn>9781424456925</eisbn><eisbn>1424456924</eisbn><abstract>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG &amp; ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0094-2898
ispartof 2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST), 2010, p.371-375
issn 0094-2898
2161-8135
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5442807
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Codecs
Decoding
H.264/AVC
IEC
Intel IPP H.264
ISO
JM 15.1
Performance analysis
Performance comparison
PSNR
Signal to noise ratio
Software libraries
Video coding
Video compression
title Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20of%20JM%2015.1%20and%20Intel%20IPP%20H.264%20encoder%20and%20decoder&rft.btitle=2010%2042nd%20Southeastern%20Symposium%20on%20System%20Theory%20(SSST)&rft.au=Swaroop,%20K%20V%20Suchethan&rft.date=2010-03&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=371-375&rft.issn=0094-2898&rft.eissn=2161-8135&rft.isbn=1424456908&rft.isbn_list=9781424456901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807&rft.eisbn=9781424456918&rft.eisbn_list=1424456916&rft.eisbn_list=9781424456925&rft.eisbn_list=1424456924&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E5442807%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5442807&rfr_iscdi=true