Loading…
Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder
Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD in...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 375 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Swaroop, K V Suchethan Rao, K R |
description | Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5442807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5442807</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5442807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtuwjAURN2X1ED5gKob_0DSe_2I7WWFSqGiKlJot8jY11IqSFDChr9vROlqZnRGsxjGHhEKRHDPVVWtCwFD1EoJC-aKTZyxqIRSunRor1kmsMTcotQ3bPQPwN6yDMCpXFhn79mo738AoCyFztj3irrUdnvfBOK-8btTX_eDiTy0-4Pv6r5teJv4-wdHXeCZLJoj7fhiteLzQpSKUxPaSN2ZRTr7B3aX_K6nyUXH7Gv2up7O8-Xn22L6ssxrNPqYh-AxuSiCNUQmbsFLFQ2ikT4Z68gTBTBOxBCTtHIbh7JOGqwkr6NVcsye_nZrItocunrvu9Pm8o_8BShwVCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</creator><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><description>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2898</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424456908</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781424456901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-8135</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456918</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424456916</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424456925</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424456924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Codecs ; Decoding ; H.264/AVC ; IEC ; Intel IPP H.264 ; ISO ; JM 15.1 ; Performance analysis ; Performance comparison ; PSNR ; Signal to noise ratio ; Software libraries ; Video coding ; Video compression</subject><ispartof>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST), 2010, p.371-375</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5442807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5442807$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><title>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)</title><addtitle>SSST</addtitle><description>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</description><subject>Codecs</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>H.264/AVC</subject><subject>IEC</subject><subject>Intel IPP H.264</subject><subject>ISO</subject><subject>JM 15.1</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance comparison</subject><subject>PSNR</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Software libraries</subject><subject>Video coding</subject><subject>Video compression</subject><issn>0094-2898</issn><issn>2161-8135</issn><isbn>1424456908</isbn><isbn>9781424456901</isbn><isbn>9781424456918</isbn><isbn>1424456916</isbn><isbn>9781424456925</isbn><isbn>1424456924</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtuwjAURN2X1ED5gKob_0DSe_2I7WWFSqGiKlJot8jY11IqSFDChr9vROlqZnRGsxjGHhEKRHDPVVWtCwFD1EoJC-aKTZyxqIRSunRor1kmsMTcotQ3bPQPwN6yDMCpXFhn79mo738AoCyFztj3irrUdnvfBOK-8btTX_eDiTy0-4Pv6r5teJv4-wdHXeCZLJoj7fhiteLzQpSKUxPaSN2ZRTr7B3aX_K6nyUXH7Gv2up7O8-Xn22L6ssxrNPqYh-AxuSiCNUQmbsFLFQ2ikT4Z68gTBTBOxBCTtHIbh7JOGqwkr6NVcsye_nZrItocunrvu9Pm8o_8BShwVCk</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creator><creator>Rao, K R</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</title><author>Swaroop, K V Suchethan ; Rao, K R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Codecs</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>H.264/AVC</topic><topic>IEC</topic><topic>Intel IPP H.264</topic><topic>ISO</topic><topic>JM 15.1</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance comparison</topic><topic>PSNR</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Software libraries</topic><topic>Video coding</topic><topic>Video compression</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, K R</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swaroop, K V Suchethan</au><au>Rao, K R</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder</atitle><btitle>2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)</btitle><stitle>SSST</stitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><spage>371</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>371-375</pages><issn>0094-2898</issn><eissn>2161-8135</eissn><isbn>1424456908</isbn><isbn>9781424456901</isbn><eisbn>9781424456918</eisbn><eisbn>1424456916</eisbn><eisbn>9781424456925</eisbn><eisbn>1424456924</eisbn><abstract>Joint Model (JM) reference software is used for academic reference of H.264 and it was developed by JVT (Joint Video Team) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (Video coding experts group). The Intel IPP (Integrated Performance Primitives) H.264 is a product of Intel which uses IPP libraries and SIMD instructions available on modern processors. The Intel IPP H.264 is multi-threaded and uses CPU optimized IPP routines. In this paper, JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 codec are compared in terms of execution time and video quality of the output decoded sequence. The metrics used for comparison are SSIM (Structural Similarity Index Metric), PSNR (Peak-to-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), MSE (Mean Square Error), motion estimation time, encoding time, decoding time and the compression ratio of the H.264 file size (encoded output). Intel IPP H.264 clearly emerges as the winner against JM 15.1 in all parameters except for the compression ratio of H.264 file size.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2898 |
ispartof | 2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST), 2010, p.371-375 |
issn | 0094-2898 2161-8135 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_5442807 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | Codecs Decoding H.264/AVC IEC Intel IPP H.264 ISO JM 15.1 Performance analysis Performance comparison PSNR Signal to noise ratio Software libraries Video coding Video compression |
title | Performance analysis and comparison of JM 15.1 and Intel IPP H.264 encoder and decoder |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20of%20JM%2015.1%20and%20Intel%20IPP%20H.264%20encoder%20and%20decoder&rft.btitle=2010%2042nd%20Southeastern%20Symposium%20on%20System%20Theory%20(SSST)&rft.au=Swaroop,%20K%20V%20Suchethan&rft.date=2010-03&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=371-375&rft.issn=0094-2898&rft.eissn=2161-8135&rft.isbn=1424456908&rft.isbn_list=9781424456901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/SSST.2010.5442807&rft.eisbn=9781424456918&rft.eisbn_list=1424456916&rft.eisbn_list=9781424456925&rft.eisbn_list=1424456924&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E5442807%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-cca1f9d2c87ee7db0a34d71173af789eaeec0792dcdf383bdf9d5f5083ea5d843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5442807&rfr_iscdi=true |