Integrating Preferences into Goal Models for Requirements Engineering

Requirements can differ in their importance. As such the priorities that stakeholders associate with requirements may vary from stakeholder to stakeholder and from one situation to the next. Differing priorities, in turn, imply different design decisions for the end system. While elicitation of requ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liaskos, S, McIlraith, S A, Sohrabi, S, Mylopoulos, J
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognition
Credit cards
Law
preferences
requirements engineering
Robustness
Semantics
variability
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Requirements can differ in their importance. As such the priorities that stakeholders associate with requirements may vary from stakeholder to stakeholder and from one situation to the next. Differing priorities, in turn, imply different design decisions for the end system. While elicitation of requirements priorities is a well studied activity, though, the modeling and reasoning side of prioritization has not enjoyed equal attention. In this paper, we address this by extending a traditional goal modeling notation to support the representation of optional and preference requirements. In our extension, optional goals are distinguished from mandatory ones. Then, quantitative prioritizations of the former are constructed and used as criteria for evaluating alternative ways to achieve the latter. A state-of-the-art preference-based planner is utilized to efficiently search for alternatives that best satisfy the given preferences. This way, analysts can acquire a better understanding of the impact of high-level stakeholder preferences to low-level design decisions.
ISSN:1090-705X
2332-6441
DOI:10.1109/RE.2010.26