A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other

Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gather...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatai, I
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Bridge circuits
Equations
Equivalent circuits
gyrator
Gyrators
Mathematical model
operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.)
Transconductance
Voltage control
voltage controlled current sourse
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gathered data the antireciprocity of this gyrator has been verified. The main advantage of this realization is that the energy flow from one port to the other can be simply controlled by modifying the bias currents of the OTAs. The second type is a commutation-operated double-bridge DC-DC converter. The energy flow in this case can be easily controlled by modifying the switching delay of between the bridges.
DOI:10.1109/SACI.2011.5873077