A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other

Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gather...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatai, I
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Bridge circuits
Equations
Equivalent circuits
gyrator
Gyrators
Mathematical model
operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.)
Transconductance
Voltage control
voltage controlled current sourse
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 621
container_issue
container_start_page 617
container_title
container_volume
creator Tatai, I
description Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gathered data the antireciprocity of this gyrator has been verified. The main advantage of this realization is that the energy flow from one port to the other can be simply controlled by modifying the bias currents of the OTAs. The second type is a commutation-operated double-bridge DC-DC converter. The energy flow in this case can be easily controlled by modifying the switching delay of between the bridges.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/SACI.2011.5873077
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_5873077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5873077</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>5873077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-8b7f297bc97754f98b2cd140ca21696755eed1586eb5e956ca898b070a14fdd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UM1KxDAYjIigrn0A8ZIX6JqkTb_kWIo_Cwse3IO3JW2_1EjblDSw1Ke36DqHGYYZ5jCE3HO25Zzpx_ey2m0F43wrFWQM4ILc8lzkueYMPi5JokH9ewXXJJnnL7aiEKCkviFdSRs_TCa42Y_UWxpPnnZLMNEHGtD07ttEt0ZmXm1nQuvGjsZPpDhi6BZqe39aJ8YYfE9t8AP1I9LJh0ij_y36lcIdubKmnzE564Ycnp8O1Wu6f3vZVeU-dZrFVNVghYa60QAyt1rVoml5zhojeKELkBKx5VIVWEvUsmiMWjsMmOG5bdss25CHv1mHiMcpuMGE5Xi-JvsBIv1Y2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Tatai, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Tatai, I</creatorcontrib><description>Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gathered data the antireciprocity of this gyrator has been verified. The main advantage of this realization is that the energy flow from one port to the other can be simply controlled by modifying the bias currents of the OTAs. The second type is a commutation-operated double-bridge DC-DC converter. The energy flow in this case can be easily controlled by modifying the switching delay of between the bridges.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781424491087</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424491088</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 142449107X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424491070</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1424491096</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781424491094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/SACI.2011.5873077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Bridge circuits ; Equations ; Equivalent circuits ; gyrator ; Gyrators ; Mathematical model ; operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.) ; Transconductance ; Voltage control ; voltage controlled current sourse</subject><ispartof>2011 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), 2011, p.617-621</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5873077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5873077$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tatai, I</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other</title><title>2011 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI)</title><addtitle>SACI</addtitle><description>Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gathered data the antireciprocity of this gyrator has been verified. The main advantage of this realization is that the energy flow from one port to the other can be simply controlled by modifying the bias currents of the OTAs. The second type is a commutation-operated double-bridge DC-DC converter. The energy flow in this case can be easily controlled by modifying the switching delay of between the bridges.</description><subject>Bridge circuits</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Equivalent circuits</subject><subject>gyrator</subject><subject>Gyrators</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.)</subject><subject>Transconductance</subject><subject>Voltage control</subject><subject>voltage controlled current sourse</subject><isbn>9781424491087</isbn><isbn>1424491088</isbn><isbn>142449107X</isbn><isbn>9781424491070</isbn><isbn>1424491096</isbn><isbn>9781424491094</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UM1KxDAYjIigrn0A8ZIX6JqkTb_kWIo_Cwse3IO3JW2_1EjblDSw1Ke36DqHGYYZ5jCE3HO25Zzpx_ey2m0F43wrFWQM4ILc8lzkueYMPi5JokH9ewXXJJnnL7aiEKCkviFdSRs_TCa42Y_UWxpPnnZLMNEHGtD07ttEt0ZmXm1nQuvGjsZPpDhi6BZqe39aJ8YYfE9t8AP1I9LJh0ij_y36lcIdubKmnzE564Ycnp8O1Wu6f3vZVeU-dZrFVNVghYa60QAyt1rVoml5zhojeKELkBKx5VIVWEvUsmiMWjsMmOG5bdss25CHv1mHiMcpuMGE5Xi-JvsBIv1Y2A</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Tatai, I</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other</title><author>Tatai, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-8b7f297bc97754f98b2cd140ca21696755eed1586eb5e956ca898b070a14fdd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bridge circuits</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Equivalent circuits</topic><topic>gyrator</topic><topic>Gyrators</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.)</topic><topic>Transconductance</topic><topic>Voltage control</topic><topic>voltage controlled current sourse</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tatai, I</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tatai, I</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other</atitle><btitle>2011 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI)</btitle><stitle>SACI</stitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>617</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>617-621</pages><isbn>9781424491087</isbn><isbn>1424491088</isbn><eisbn>142449107X</eisbn><eisbn>9781424491070</eisbn><eisbn>1424491096</eisbn><eisbn>9781424491094</eisbn><abstract>Two types of gyrators that can be used for controlling the energy transfer between two sub networks are analyzed in this paper. The first one operates time-continuously and is implemented using a LM 13700 operational transconductance amplifier (OTA). Under PSpice simulation and experimentally gathered data the antireciprocity of this gyrator has been verified. The main advantage of this realization is that the energy flow from one port to the other can be simply controlled by modifying the bias currents of the OTAs. The second type is a commutation-operated double-bridge DC-DC converter. The energy flow in this case can be easily controlled by modifying the switching delay of between the bridges.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/SACI.2011.5873077</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9781424491087
ispartof 2011 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), 2011, p.617-621
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_5873077
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Bridge circuits
Equations
Equivalent circuits
gyrator
Gyrators
Mathematical model
operational transconductance amplifier (OTA.)
Transconductance
Voltage control
voltage controlled current sourse
title A comparison of two gyrator realization as regarding the energy flow control from one port to the other
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T22%3A52%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20two%20gyrator%20realization%20as%20regarding%20the%20energy%20flow%20control%20from%20one%20port%20to%20the%20other&rft.btitle=2011%206th%20IEEE%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Applied%20Computational%20Intelligence%20and%20Informatics%20(SACI)&rft.au=Tatai,%20I&rft.date=2011-05&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=617-621&rft.isbn=9781424491087&rft.isbn_list=1424491088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/SACI.2011.5873077&rft.eisbn=142449107X&rft.eisbn_list=9781424491070&rft.eisbn_list=1424491096&rft.eisbn_list=9781424491094&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E5873077%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i90t-8b7f297bc97754f98b2cd140ca21696755eed1586eb5e956ca898b070a14fdd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5873077&rfr_iscdi=true