Loading…

Automatic Extraction of Pipeline Parallelism for Embedded Software Using Linear Programming

The complexity and performance requirements of embedded software are continuously increasing, making Multiprocessor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) architectures more and more important in the domain of embedded and cyber-physical systems. Using multiple cores in a single system reduces problems concerning e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cordes, D., Heinig, A., Marwedel, P., Mallik, A.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The complexity and performance requirements of embedded software are continuously increasing, making Multiprocessor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) architectures more and more important in the domain of embedded and cyber-physical systems. Using multiple cores in a single system reduces problems concerning energy consumption, heat dissipation, and increases performance. Nevertheless, these benefits do not come for free. Porting existing, mostly sequential, applications to MPSoCs requires extracting efficient parallelism to utilize all available cores. Many embedded applications, like network services and multimedia tasks for voice-, image- and video processing, are operating on data streams and thus have a streaming-based structure. Despite the abundance of parallelism in streaming applications, it is a non-trivial task to split and efficiently map sequential applications to MPSoCs. Therefore, we present an algorithm which automatically extracts pipeline parallelism from sequential ANSI-C applications. The presented tool employs an integer linear programming (ILP) based approach enriched with an adequate cost model to automatically control the granularity of the parallelization. By applying our tool to real-life applications, it can be shown that our approach is able to speed up applications by a factor of up to 3.9x on a four-core MPSoC architecture, compared to a sequential execution.
ISSN:1521-9097
2690-5965
DOI:10.1109/ICPADS.2011.31