Loading…

Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field

Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Towers, E., Simonovich, J. A., Zastavker, Y. V.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page F3D-7
container_issue
container_start_page F3D-1
container_title
container_volume
creator Towers, E.
Simonovich, J. A.
Zastavker, Y. V.
description Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6142960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6142960</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6142960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1PwzAQxc2XRFq6I7F4Y0o4O47tjKhqoVIlBkBionKSczFqncg2A_99I1qm93t6d6fTI-SWQcEY1A_L1aLgwFghmeC1hDMyq5VmknEthFTsnGS8VCqXpfi4IJP_QFeXJANWQ15poa_JJMZvACi1VBn5fE0_HfoU7-mAocUhud5H2luavpCi3zqPGJzf0iH0FmMcY2p8R91-2LnWHMdtH6jzCQPGNMLfrnW4627IlTW7iLOTTsn7cvE2f87XL0-r-eM6d0xVKRdctoqXqJE3HVoUSjFhoank-L-sKi7QMAMGwaqRtWzLBmqJ1naya0Y3JXfHuw4RN0NwexN-N6eeygPiUFle</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-5848</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1612844685</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781612844688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-634X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844671</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844695</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844693</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Engineering profession ; Expectancy Value Theory ; First-Year Program ; Interviews ; Knowledge engineering ; Laboratories ; Mathematics ; Physics ; Student Motivation ; Student Perceptions ; Writing</subject><ispartof>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F3D-1-F3D-7</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142960$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonovich, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><title>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</title><addtitle>FIE</addtitle><description>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</description><subject>Engineering profession</subject><subject>Expectancy Value Theory</subject><subject>First-Year Program</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge engineering</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Perceptions</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0190-5848</issn><issn>2377-634X</issn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><isbn>9781612844671</isbn><isbn>9781612844695</isbn><isbn>1612844693</isbn><isbn>1612844677</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1PwzAQxc2XRFq6I7F4Y0o4O47tjKhqoVIlBkBionKSczFqncg2A_99I1qm93t6d6fTI-SWQcEY1A_L1aLgwFghmeC1hDMyq5VmknEthFTsnGS8VCqXpfi4IJP_QFeXJANWQ15poa_JJMZvACi1VBn5fE0_HfoU7-mAocUhud5H2luavpCi3zqPGJzf0iH0FmMcY2p8R91-2LnWHMdtH6jzCQPGNMLfrnW4627IlTW7iLOTTsn7cvE2f87XL0-r-eM6d0xVKRdctoqXqJE3HVoUSjFhoank-L-sKi7QMAMGwaqRtWzLBmqJ1naya0Y3JXfHuw4RN0NwexN-N6eeygPiUFle</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Towers, E.</creator><creator>Simonovich, J. A.</creator><creator>Zastavker, Y. V.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><author>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Engineering profession</topic><topic>Expectancy Value Theory</topic><topic>First-Year Program</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge engineering</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Perceptions</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonovich, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towers, E.</au><au>Simonovich, J. A.</au><au>Zastavker, Y. V.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</atitle><btitle>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</btitle><stitle>FIE</stitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>F3D-1</spage><epage>F3D-7</epage><pages>F3D-1-F3D-7</pages><issn>0190-5848</issn><eissn>2377-634X</eissn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><eisbn>9781612844671</eisbn><eisbn>9781612844695</eisbn><eisbn>1612844693</eisbn><eisbn>1612844677</eisbn><abstract>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0190-5848
ispartof 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F3D-1-F3D-7
issn 0190-5848
2377-634X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6142960
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Engineering profession
Expectancy Value Theory
First-Year Program
Interviews
Knowledge engineering
Laboratories
Mathematics
Physics
Student Motivation
Student Perceptions
Writing
title Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Students'%20perceptions%20of%20the%20engineering%20profession%20and%20implications%20for%20interest%20in%20the%20field&rft.btitle=2011%20Frontiers%20in%20Education%20Conference%20(FIE)&rft.au=Towers,%20E.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.spage=F3D-1&rft.epage=F3D-7&rft.pages=F3D-1-F3D-7&rft.issn=0190-5848&rft.eissn=2377-634X&rft.isbn=1612844685&rft.isbn_list=9781612844688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960&rft.eisbn=9781612844671&rft.eisbn_list=9781612844695&rft.eisbn_list=1612844693&rft.eisbn_list=1612844677&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E6142960%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6142960&rfr_iscdi=true