Loading…
Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field
Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | F3D-7 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | F3D-1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Towers, E. Simonovich, J. A. Zastavker, Y. V. |
description | Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6142960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6142960</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6142960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1PwzAQxc2XRFq6I7F4Y0o4O47tjKhqoVIlBkBionKSczFqncg2A_99I1qm93t6d6fTI-SWQcEY1A_L1aLgwFghmeC1hDMyq5VmknEthFTsnGS8VCqXpfi4IJP_QFeXJANWQ15poa_JJMZvACi1VBn5fE0_HfoU7-mAocUhud5H2luavpCi3zqPGJzf0iH0FmMcY2p8R91-2LnWHMdtH6jzCQPGNMLfrnW4627IlTW7iLOTTsn7cvE2f87XL0-r-eM6d0xVKRdctoqXqJE3HVoUSjFhoank-L-sKi7QMAMGwaqRtWzLBmqJ1naya0Y3JXfHuw4RN0NwexN-N6eeygPiUFle</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-5848</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1612844685</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781612844688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-634X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844671</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781612844695</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844693</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1612844677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Engineering profession ; Expectancy Value Theory ; First-Year Program ; Interviews ; Knowledge engineering ; Laboratories ; Mathematics ; Physics ; Student Motivation ; Student Perceptions ; Writing</subject><ispartof>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F3D-1-F3D-7</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6142960$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Towers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonovich, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><title>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</title><addtitle>FIE</addtitle><description>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</description><subject>Engineering profession</subject><subject>Expectancy Value Theory</subject><subject>First-Year Program</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge engineering</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Student Perceptions</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0190-5848</issn><issn>2377-634X</issn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><isbn>9781612844671</isbn><isbn>9781612844695</isbn><isbn>1612844693</isbn><isbn>1612844677</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1PwzAQxc2XRFq6I7F4Y0o4O47tjKhqoVIlBkBionKSczFqncg2A_99I1qm93t6d6fTI-SWQcEY1A_L1aLgwFghmeC1hDMyq5VmknEthFTsnGS8VCqXpfi4IJP_QFeXJANWQ15poa_JJMZvACi1VBn5fE0_HfoU7-mAocUhud5H2luavpCi3zqPGJzf0iH0FmMcY2p8R91-2LnWHMdtH6jzCQPGNMLfrnW4627IlTW7iLOTTsn7cvE2f87XL0-r-eM6d0xVKRdctoqXqJE3HVoUSjFhoank-L-sKi7QMAMGwaqRtWzLBmqJ1naya0Y3JXfHuw4RN0NwexN-N6eeygPiUFle</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Towers, E.</creator><creator>Simonovich, J. A.</creator><creator>Zastavker, Y. V.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</title><author>Towers, E. ; Simonovich, J. A. ; Zastavker, Y. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Engineering profession</topic><topic>Expectancy Value Theory</topic><topic>First-Year Program</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge engineering</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Student Perceptions</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Towers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonovich, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zastavker, Y. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Towers, E.</au><au>Simonovich, J. A.</au><au>Zastavker, Y. V.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field</atitle><btitle>2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)</btitle><stitle>FIE</stitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><spage>F3D-1</spage><epage>F3D-7</epage><pages>F3D-1-F3D-7</pages><issn>0190-5848</issn><eissn>2377-634X</eissn><isbn>1612844685</isbn><isbn>9781612844688</isbn><eisbn>9781612844671</eisbn><eisbn>9781612844695</eisbn><eisbn>1612844693</eisbn><eisbn>1612844677</eisbn><abstract>Understanding personal learning goals and perceptions of engineering is critical in encouraging students' interest in the field. This work defines engineering in terms of the students' course-related learning outcomes (e.g., skills and knowledge) described in the latest version of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). We argue that aligning students' perceptions of course task value with the EC2000 should enhance students' perceptions of the engineering profession and increase their interest in the field overall. Using student interviews from a larger study of instructor and student experiences in three undergraduate engineering programs, this study is guided by the following questions: 1) What are students' perceptions of the skills required by the engineering profession? 2) How do these perceptions compare to the skill set defined by ABET EC2000? 3) How do these perceptions affect students' assessment of course value and interest in the relevant coursework? Two required introductory engineering courses, Physics Laboratory and Engineering Design, are investigated. The ensuing theoretical framework is placed in the broader context of Eccles and Wigfield's expectancy-value model, specifically focusing on utility value. Our findings indicate that students' perceptions of the skills and knowledge required in professional engineering diverge from those defined by ABET. This disparity is negatively correlated to the students' assessment of the required coursework utility value. The absence of perceived utility then contributes to the students' lack of interest in their courses.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-5848 |
ispartof | 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p.F3D-1-F3D-7 |
issn | 0190-5848 2377-634X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6142960 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | Engineering profession Expectancy Value Theory First-Year Program Interviews Knowledge engineering Laboratories Mathematics Physics Student Motivation Student Perceptions Writing |
title | Students' perceptions of the engineering profession and implications for interest in the field |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Students'%20perceptions%20of%20the%20engineering%20profession%20and%20implications%20for%20interest%20in%20the%20field&rft.btitle=2011%20Frontiers%20in%20Education%20Conference%20(FIE)&rft.au=Towers,%20E.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.spage=F3D-1&rft.epage=F3D-7&rft.pages=F3D-1-F3D-7&rft.issn=0190-5848&rft.eissn=2377-634X&rft.isbn=1612844685&rft.isbn_list=9781612844688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142960&rft.eisbn=9781612844671&rft.eisbn_list=9781612844695&rft.eisbn_list=1612844693&rft.eisbn_list=1612844677&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E6142960%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-426c723e8e2bdefe47714f0b5644665524ea1a0ae0f724e86c3b096effd6db6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6142960&rfr_iscdi=true |