Loading…
Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives
This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit lay...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on power electronics 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3 |
container_end_page | 1767 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1757 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power electronics |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Gong, Xun Ferreira, Jan Abraham |
description | This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6547771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6547771</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3107971691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QLwJiJedOflom0tX55xsKK73JU1TyNiamXSC_97UDa8Oh_O874EHoVsgEwAiH8uP2XJCCbAJpRkwAmdoBJJDQoBk52hE8lwkuZTsEl2FsCEEuCAwQmXhdnvlbXAdVl2DP01z0L2Nm2tx4bphMw2erRbYdnhtC_z2Miv_0LXFi_m0TKYqRGLleufxs7ffJlyji1Ztg7k5zTEqY6h4TZbv80XxtEw0y2Wf0AakqTWjjBrR8ForJSEHmmapUilr0lxI1YLmkaqFYLUyglCdAck51zUbo_tj7d67r4MJfbVxB9_FjxVwztOUSiCRgiOlvQvBm7bae7tT_qcCUg3uqsFdNbirTu5i5uHUrIJW29arTtvwH6Q5J5yAiNzdkbPGmP9zKniWxaJfVaN0mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444662910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creator><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Circuits ; Comparative analysis ; Electric noise ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Electrical machines ; Electromagnetic compatibility ; Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) ; Electromagnetic interference ; electromagnetic interference (EMI) ; Electronics ; Exact sciences and technology ; filter ; Information, signal and communications theory ; insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) ; Insulated gate bipolar transistors ; Inverters ; JFETs ; Logic gates ; motor drive ; Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors ; Regulation and control ; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices ; Silicon carbide ; silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) ; Switches ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transistors</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6547771$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28404015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><title>IEEE transactions on power electronics</title><addtitle>TPEL</addtitle><description>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Electric noise</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrical machines</subject><subject>Electromagnetic compatibility</subject><subject>Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)</subject><subject>Electromagnetic interference</subject><subject>electromagnetic interference (EMI)</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>filter</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)</subject><subject>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</subject><subject>Inverters</subject><subject>JFETs</subject><subject>Logic gates</subject><subject>motor drive</subject><subject>Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors</subject><subject>Regulation and control</subject><subject>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><subject>Silicon carbide</subject><subject>silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET)</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><issn>0885-8993</issn><issn>1941-0107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QLwJiJedOflom0tX55xsKK73JU1TyNiamXSC_97UDa8Oh_O874EHoVsgEwAiH8uP2XJCCbAJpRkwAmdoBJJDQoBk52hE8lwkuZTsEl2FsCEEuCAwQmXhdnvlbXAdVl2DP01z0L2Nm2tx4bphMw2erRbYdnhtC_z2Miv_0LXFi_m0TKYqRGLleufxs7ffJlyji1Ztg7k5zTEqY6h4TZbv80XxtEw0y2Wf0AakqTWjjBrR8ForJSEHmmapUilr0lxI1YLmkaqFYLUyglCdAck51zUbo_tj7d67r4MJfbVxB9_FjxVwztOUSiCRgiOlvQvBm7bae7tT_qcCUg3uqsFdNbirTu5i5uHUrIJW29arTtvwH6Q5J5yAiNzdkbPGmP9zKniWxaJfVaN0mw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Gong, Xun</creator><creator>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><author>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Electric noise</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrical machines</topic><topic>Electromagnetic compatibility</topic><topic>Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)</topic><topic>Electromagnetic interference</topic><topic>electromagnetic interference (EMI)</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>filter</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)</topic><topic>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</topic><topic>Inverters</topic><topic>JFETs</topic><topic>Logic gates</topic><topic>motor drive</topic><topic>Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors</topic><topic>Regulation and control</topic><topic>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</topic><topic>Silicon carbide</topic><topic>silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET)</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gong, Xun</au><au>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle><stitle>TPEL</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1757</spage><epage>1767</epage><pages>1757-1767</pages><issn>0885-8993</issn><eissn>1941-0107</eissn><coden>ITPEE8</coden><abstract>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8993 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767 |
issn | 0885-8993 1941-0107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6547771 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Applied sciences Circuits Comparative analysis Electric noise Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering Electrical machines Electromagnetic compatibility Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Electromagnetic interference electromagnetic interference (EMI) Electronics Exact sciences and technology filter Information, signal and communications theory insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) Insulated gate bipolar transistors Inverters JFETs Logic gates motor drive Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors Regulation and control Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices Silicon carbide silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) Switches Telecommunications and information theory Transistors |
title | Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20Reduction%20of%20Conducted%20EMI%20in%20SiC%20JFET%20and%20Si%20IGBT-Based%20Motor%20Drives&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20electronics&rft.au=Gong,%20Xun&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1757&rft.epage=1767&rft.pages=1757-1767&rft.issn=0885-8993&rft.eissn=1941-0107&rft.coden=ITPEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E3107971691%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444662910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6547771&rfr_iscdi=true |