Loading…

Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives

This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit lay...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on power electronics 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767
Main Authors: Gong, Xun, Ferreira, Jan Abraham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3
container_end_page 1767
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1757
container_title IEEE transactions on power electronics
container_volume 29
creator Gong, Xun
Ferreira, Jan Abraham
description This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6547771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6547771</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3107971691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QLwJiJedOflom0tX55xsKK73JU1TyNiamXSC_97UDa8Oh_O874EHoVsgEwAiH8uP2XJCCbAJpRkwAmdoBJJDQoBk52hE8lwkuZTsEl2FsCEEuCAwQmXhdnvlbXAdVl2DP01z0L2Nm2tx4bphMw2erRbYdnhtC_z2Miv_0LXFi_m0TKYqRGLleufxs7ffJlyji1Ztg7k5zTEqY6h4TZbv80XxtEw0y2Wf0AakqTWjjBrR8ForJSEHmmapUilr0lxI1YLmkaqFYLUyglCdAck51zUbo_tj7d67r4MJfbVxB9_FjxVwztOUSiCRgiOlvQvBm7bae7tT_qcCUg3uqsFdNbirTu5i5uHUrIJW29arTtvwH6Q5J5yAiNzdkbPGmP9zKniWxaJfVaN0mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444662910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creator><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><description>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Circuits ; Comparative analysis ; Electric noise ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Electrical machines ; Electromagnetic compatibility ; Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) ; Electromagnetic interference ; electromagnetic interference (EMI) ; Electronics ; Exact sciences and technology ; filter ; Information, signal and communications theory ; insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) ; Insulated gate bipolar transistors ; Inverters ; JFETs ; Logic gates ; motor drive ; Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors ; Regulation and control ; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices ; Silicon carbide ; silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) ; Switches ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Transistors</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6547771$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28404015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><title>IEEE transactions on power electronics</title><addtitle>TPEL</addtitle><description>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Electric noise</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrical machines</subject><subject>Electromagnetic compatibility</subject><subject>Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)</subject><subject>Electromagnetic interference</subject><subject>electromagnetic interference (EMI)</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>filter</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)</subject><subject>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</subject><subject>Inverters</subject><subject>JFETs</subject><subject>Logic gates</subject><subject>motor drive</subject><subject>Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors</subject><subject>Regulation and control</subject><subject>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><subject>Silicon carbide</subject><subject>silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET)</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><issn>0885-8993</issn><issn>1941-0107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QLwJiJedOflom0tX55xsKK73JU1TyNiamXSC_97UDa8Oh_O874EHoVsgEwAiH8uP2XJCCbAJpRkwAmdoBJJDQoBk52hE8lwkuZTsEl2FsCEEuCAwQmXhdnvlbXAdVl2DP01z0L2Nm2tx4bphMw2erRbYdnhtC_z2Miv_0LXFi_m0TKYqRGLleufxs7ffJlyji1Ztg7k5zTEqY6h4TZbv80XxtEw0y2Wf0AakqTWjjBrR8ForJSEHmmapUilr0lxI1YLmkaqFYLUyglCdAck51zUbo_tj7d67r4MJfbVxB9_FjxVwztOUSiCRgiOlvQvBm7bae7tT_qcCUg3uqsFdNbirTu5i5uHUrIJW29arTtvwH6Q5J5yAiNzdkbPGmP9zKniWxaJfVaN0mw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Gong, Xun</creator><creator>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</title><author>Gong, Xun ; Ferreira, Jan Abraham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Electric noise</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrical machines</topic><topic>Electromagnetic compatibility</topic><topic>Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)</topic><topic>Electromagnetic interference</topic><topic>electromagnetic interference (EMI)</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>filter</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)</topic><topic>Insulated gate bipolar transistors</topic><topic>Inverters</topic><topic>JFETs</topic><topic>Logic gates</topic><topic>motor drive</topic><topic>Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors</topic><topic>Regulation and control</topic><topic>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</topic><topic>Silicon carbide</topic><topic>silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET)</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gong, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gong, Xun</au><au>Ferreira, Jan Abraham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle><stitle>TPEL</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1757</spage><epage>1767</epage><pages>1757-1767</pages><issn>0885-8993</issn><eissn>1941-0107</eissn><coden>ITPEE8</coden><abstract>This paper compares the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) in Si insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET) based motor drives. Two inverters, with the SiC and Si transistors, respectively, are built using the same circuit layout and investigated accordingly. Their conducted EMI levels are compared under the conditions of without filter and with traditional common mode (CM) filters. Reasons of the exhibited different noise emissions are analyzed. To verify the discussions, two inverters are tested in the CM. This allows for the identification and analysis of their maximized CM and differential mode (DM) wave shapes. It is shown that the excited parasitic oscillations during the switching transients are magnified more in the SiC JFET inverter, which is the main cause of the noise difference. Lastly, improved filtering solutions are proposed, which effectively suppressed the increased high-frequency noise due to the faster SiC switching speed.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8993
ispartof IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2014-04, Vol.29 (4), p.1757-1767
issn 0885-8993
1941-0107
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6547771
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Applied sciences
Circuits
Comparative analysis
Electric noise
Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering
Electrical machines
Electromagnetic compatibility
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Electromagnetic interference
electromagnetic interference (EMI)
Electronics
Exact sciences and technology
filter
Information, signal and communications theory
insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)
Insulated gate bipolar transistors
Inverters
JFETs
Logic gates
motor drive
Other multijunction devices. Power transistors. Thyristors
Regulation and control
Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices
Silicon carbide
silicon carbide (SiC) junction field-effect transistor (JFET)
Switches
Telecommunications and information theory
Transistors
title Comparison and Reduction of Conducted EMI in SiC JFET and Si IGBT-Based Motor Drives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20Reduction%20of%20Conducted%20EMI%20in%20SiC%20JFET%20and%20Si%20IGBT-Based%20Motor%20Drives&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20electronics&rft.au=Gong,%20Xun&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1757&rft.epage=1767&rft.pages=1757-1767&rft.issn=0885-8993&rft.eissn=1941-0107&rft.coden=ITPEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2271301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E3107971691%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-2d19ebc3232e5d4bcaa91812676aa63d6859af1c49ebb553bae502c710844cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444662910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6547771&rfr_iscdi=true