Loading…

An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions

The work presented in this paper has been carried out in order to find means to improve the existing methods of board-level drop reliability assessment to better represent the use environment loading conditions of modern portable electronic devices. To provide goals and guidance for the development...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mattila, T. T., Vajavaara, L., Hokka, J., Hussa, E., Makela, M., Halkola, V.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1268
container_issue
container_start_page 1259
container_title
container_volume
creator Mattila, T. T.
Vajavaara, L.
Hokka, J.
Hussa, E.
Makela, M.
Halkola, V.
description The work presented in this paper has been carried out in order to find means to improve the existing methods of board-level drop reliability assessment to better represent the use environment loading conditions of modern portable electronic devices. To provide goals and guidance for the development work, eight commercially available smart phones from different manufacturers were evaluated for their free-fall drop response. The results show that the drop response can be divided conceptually into two parts: (i) forced bending/twisting of the component board at the moment of the impact, and (ii) subsequent (resonance) vibration of the component board. The strain magnitudes caused by the forced bending and twisting were much higher than those by the post impact vibrations. Furthermore, sharp strain peaks were often identified within a few milliseconds from the impacts. The results of the Finite Element simulations show that the distribution of strains on the component boards is highly nonuniform; The regions of high strain are localized because they are caused either by the forced bending (by surrounding covers and frames in part i) or by internal collisions between the component board and the surrounding mechanical structures (sharp strain peaks in part ii). The devices were characterized for maximum strain, average rate to maximum strain, vibration frequencies and maximum value of deceleration. The following goals were set for the development of a board-level drop test methodology: a test board that simulates the response of modern portable products should be able to produce board strain well above 3 500 μ ("micro-strain" = [10 -6 m/m]) and mean rate to maximum strain close to 7 s -1 . Reaching these objectives requires significant changes to the existing JESD22-B111 approach. An investigation on the effects of the shape of deceleration input pulse was carried out first, followed by modifications for the board support to further increase the maximum strain and the average strain-rate of the JESD22-B111 compliant printed wiring board. The support was modified by replacing the four point supports by line supports at both ends of the rectangular shaped board. This approach can achieve the maximum strains of 5 000 μ when coupled with the optimized deceleration input. In addition to the increased strain and strain-rate, dampening of the board vibration became more effective, which is also in a better agreement with the typical drop response of portable electronic
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ECTC.2013.6575736
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6575736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6575736</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6575736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-bdabd27ec6f0f72f2edaa70e572a3ef989cee47f368ff303c3d5e60ff7630f4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMlqwzAUVDdokuYDSi_6AadPepZkHYPpBoFe0nOQrSei4sRGdlLy93VpCj0NzAYzjN0LWAgB9vGpXJcLCQIXWhllUF-wqciNtSBRyks2kWhMpozUV2xuTfGnIVyzCShtM6UAb9m07z8BcgBRTJhf7rnrutS6esuHlletSz5r6EgN96nteKImuio2cThxOrrm4IbY7vlXHLY87sbgkTyv2zT6_imHnkZy7-MP1d-xm-CanuZnnLGP56d1-Zqt3l_eyuUqi8KoIau8q7w0VOsAwcggyTtngMZJDinYwtZEuQmoixAQsEavSEMIRiOEvMIZe_jtjUS06VLcuXTanN_CbwIyXSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Mattila, T. T. ; Vajavaara, L. ; Hokka, J. ; Hussa, E. ; Makela, M. ; Halkola, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattila, T. T. ; Vajavaara, L. ; Hokka, J. ; Hussa, E. ; Makela, M. ; Halkola, V.</creatorcontrib><description>The work presented in this paper has been carried out in order to find means to improve the existing methods of board-level drop reliability assessment to better represent the use environment loading conditions of modern portable electronic devices. To provide goals and guidance for the development work, eight commercially available smart phones from different manufacturers were evaluated for their free-fall drop response. The results show that the drop response can be divided conceptually into two parts: (i) forced bending/twisting of the component board at the moment of the impact, and (ii) subsequent (resonance) vibration of the component board. The strain magnitudes caused by the forced bending and twisting were much higher than those by the post impact vibrations. Furthermore, sharp strain peaks were often identified within a few milliseconds from the impacts. The results of the Finite Element simulations show that the distribution of strains on the component boards is highly nonuniform; The regions of high strain are localized because they are caused either by the forced bending (by surrounding covers and frames in part i) or by internal collisions between the component board and the surrounding mechanical structures (sharp strain peaks in part ii). The devices were characterized for maximum strain, average rate to maximum strain, vibration frequencies and maximum value of deceleration. The following goals were set for the development of a board-level drop test methodology: a test board that simulates the response of modern portable products should be able to produce board strain well above 3 500 μ ("micro-strain" = [10 -6 m/m]) and mean rate to maximum strain close to 7 s -1 . Reaching these objectives requires significant changes to the existing JESD22-B111 approach. An investigation on the effects of the shape of deceleration input pulse was carried out first, followed by modifications for the board support to further increase the maximum strain and the average strain-rate of the JESD22-B111 compliant printed wiring board. The support was modified by replacing the four point supports by line supports at both ends of the rectangular shaped board. This approach can achieve the maximum strains of 5 000 μ when coupled with the optimized deceleration input. In addition to the increased strain and strain-rate, dampening of the board vibration became more effective, which is also in a better agreement with the typical drop response of portable electronic products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0569-5503</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781479902330</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1479902330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-5726</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479902322</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479902323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ECTC.2013.6575736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Finite element analysis ; History ; Reliability ; Shape ; Strain ; Strain measurement ; Vibrations</subject><ispartof>2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2013, p.1259-1268</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6575736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54555,54920,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6575736$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattila, T. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vajavaara, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokka, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussa, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makela, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halkola, V.</creatorcontrib><title>An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions</title><title>2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference</title><addtitle>ECTC</addtitle><description>The work presented in this paper has been carried out in order to find means to improve the existing methods of board-level drop reliability assessment to better represent the use environment loading conditions of modern portable electronic devices. To provide goals and guidance for the development work, eight commercially available smart phones from different manufacturers were evaluated for their free-fall drop response. The results show that the drop response can be divided conceptually into two parts: (i) forced bending/twisting of the component board at the moment of the impact, and (ii) subsequent (resonance) vibration of the component board. The strain magnitudes caused by the forced bending and twisting were much higher than those by the post impact vibrations. Furthermore, sharp strain peaks were often identified within a few milliseconds from the impacts. The results of the Finite Element simulations show that the distribution of strains on the component boards is highly nonuniform; The regions of high strain are localized because they are caused either by the forced bending (by surrounding covers and frames in part i) or by internal collisions between the component board and the surrounding mechanical structures (sharp strain peaks in part ii). The devices were characterized for maximum strain, average rate to maximum strain, vibration frequencies and maximum value of deceleration. The following goals were set for the development of a board-level drop test methodology: a test board that simulates the response of modern portable products should be able to produce board strain well above 3 500 μ ("micro-strain" = [10 -6 m/m]) and mean rate to maximum strain close to 7 s -1 . Reaching these objectives requires significant changes to the existing JESD22-B111 approach. An investigation on the effects of the shape of deceleration input pulse was carried out first, followed by modifications for the board support to further increase the maximum strain and the average strain-rate of the JESD22-B111 compliant printed wiring board. The support was modified by replacing the four point supports by line supports at both ends of the rectangular shaped board. This approach can achieve the maximum strains of 5 000 μ when coupled with the optimized deceleration input. In addition to the increased strain and strain-rate, dampening of the board vibration became more effective, which is also in a better agreement with the typical drop response of portable electronic products.</description><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Strain measurement</subject><subject>Vibrations</subject><issn>0569-5503</issn><issn>2377-5726</issn><isbn>9781479902330</isbn><isbn>1479902330</isbn><isbn>1479902322</isbn><isbn>9781479902323</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMlqwzAUVDdokuYDSi_6AadPepZkHYPpBoFe0nOQrSei4sRGdlLy93VpCj0NzAYzjN0LWAgB9vGpXJcLCQIXWhllUF-wqciNtSBRyks2kWhMpozUV2xuTfGnIVyzCShtM6UAb9m07z8BcgBRTJhf7rnrutS6esuHlletSz5r6EgN96nteKImuio2cThxOrrm4IbY7vlXHLY87sbgkTyv2zT6_imHnkZy7-MP1d-xm-CanuZnnLGP56d1-Zqt3l_eyuUqi8KoIau8q7w0VOsAwcggyTtngMZJDinYwtZEuQmoixAQsEavSEMIRiOEvMIZe_jtjUS06VLcuXTanN_CbwIyXSE</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Mattila, T. T.</creator><creator>Vajavaara, L.</creator><creator>Hokka, J.</creator><creator>Hussa, E.</creator><creator>Makela, M.</creator><creator>Halkola, V.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions</title><author>Mattila, T. T. ; Vajavaara, L. ; Hokka, J. ; Hussa, E. ; Makela, M. ; Halkola, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-bdabd27ec6f0f72f2edaa70e572a3ef989cee47f368ff303c3d5e60ff7630f4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Strain measurement</topic><topic>Vibrations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattila, T. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vajavaara, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokka, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussa, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makela, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halkola, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattila, T. T.</au><au>Vajavaara, L.</au><au>Hokka, J.</au><au>Hussa, E.</au><au>Makela, M.</au><au>Halkola, V.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions</atitle><btitle>2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference</btitle><stitle>ECTC</stitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>1259</spage><epage>1268</epage><pages>1259-1268</pages><issn>0569-5503</issn><eissn>2377-5726</eissn><isbn>9781479902330</isbn><isbn>1479902330</isbn><eisbn>1479902322</eisbn><eisbn>9781479902323</eisbn><abstract>The work presented in this paper has been carried out in order to find means to improve the existing methods of board-level drop reliability assessment to better represent the use environment loading conditions of modern portable electronic devices. To provide goals and guidance for the development work, eight commercially available smart phones from different manufacturers were evaluated for their free-fall drop response. The results show that the drop response can be divided conceptually into two parts: (i) forced bending/twisting of the component board at the moment of the impact, and (ii) subsequent (resonance) vibration of the component board. The strain magnitudes caused by the forced bending and twisting were much higher than those by the post impact vibrations. Furthermore, sharp strain peaks were often identified within a few milliseconds from the impacts. The results of the Finite Element simulations show that the distribution of strains on the component boards is highly nonuniform; The regions of high strain are localized because they are caused either by the forced bending (by surrounding covers and frames in part i) or by internal collisions between the component board and the surrounding mechanical structures (sharp strain peaks in part ii). The devices were characterized for maximum strain, average rate to maximum strain, vibration frequencies and maximum value of deceleration. The following goals were set for the development of a board-level drop test methodology: a test board that simulates the response of modern portable products should be able to produce board strain well above 3 500 μ ("micro-strain" = [10 -6 m/m]) and mean rate to maximum strain close to 7 s -1 . Reaching these objectives requires significant changes to the existing JESD22-B111 approach. An investigation on the effects of the shape of deceleration input pulse was carried out first, followed by modifications for the board support to further increase the maximum strain and the average strain-rate of the JESD22-B111 compliant printed wiring board. The support was modified by replacing the four point supports by line supports at both ends of the rectangular shaped board. This approach can achieve the maximum strains of 5 000 μ when coupled with the optimized deceleration input. In addition to the increased strain and strain-rate, dampening of the board vibration became more effective, which is also in a better agreement with the typical drop response of portable electronic products.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ECTC.2013.6575736</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0569-5503
ispartof 2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2013, p.1259-1268
issn 0569-5503
2377-5726
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6575736
source IEEE Xplore All Conference Series
subjects Finite element analysis
History
Reliability
Shape
Strain
Strain measurement
Vibrations
title An approach to board-level drop reliability evaluation with improved correlation with use conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=An%20approach%20to%20board-level%20drop%20reliability%20evaluation%20with%20improved%20correlation%20with%20use%20conditions&rft.btitle=2013%20IEEE%2063rd%20Electronic%20Components%20and%20Technology%20Conference&rft.au=Mattila,%20T.%20T.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1268&rft.pages=1259-1268&rft.issn=0569-5503&rft.eissn=2377-5726&rft.isbn=9781479902330&rft.isbn_list=1479902330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ECTC.2013.6575736&rft.eisbn=1479902322&rft.eisbn_list=9781479902323&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E6575736%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-bdabd27ec6f0f72f2edaa70e572a3ef989cee47f368ff303c3d5e60ff7630f4b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6575736&rfr_iscdi=true