Loading…

Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile

H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 "High 422" profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruiz, Damian, Sladojevic, Srdjan, Culibrk, Dubravko, Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 122
container_issue
container_start_page 119
container_title
container_volume 1
creator Ruiz, Damian
Sladojevic, Srdjan
Culibrk, Dubravko
Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo
description H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 "High 422" profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6704904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6704904</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6704904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8b07d72d708c049c260203de48a57f7232f63c97daf27795fc5b25d31e184c433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AYhFdEUGt-QS_7A0x89yN5d49SqhEDHlovXkqyH7jSNGE3Cv57Y9vTzMPAwAwhSwYFY6Aftutm87opODBRVAhSg7wgt0yi1qAB9CXJNKoTK63VNclS-gIAhlgKWd2Qj9XQj20MaTjQwVMzU3QphRlHF_0Q-_Zg3H_EIO_CRH9SQdXRWTdOn_f0-2BdpHXBK0nrIDmnYxx82Ls7cuXbfXLZWRfk_Wm9XdV58_b8snps8sCwnHLVAVrkFkGZeYHhFXAQ1knVluiRC-4rYTTa1nNEXXpTdry0gjmmpJFCLMjy1Bucc7sxhr6Nv7vzHeIPK35ROg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Ruiz, Damian ; Sladojevic, Srdjan ; Culibrk, Dubravko ; Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Damian ; Sladojevic, Srdjan ; Culibrk, Dubravko ; Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><description>H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 "High 422" profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781479908998</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1479908991</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479909009</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479909025</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479909025</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479909001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>banding artifacts ; Bit rate ; bit-depth ; contouring ; Encoding ; Fidelity Range Extensions ; H.264 ; High 422 Profile ; Internal Bit Depth Increase ; PSNR ; Transform coding ; Video coding</subject><ispartof>2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013, Vol.1, p.119-122</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6704904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6704904$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sladojevic, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culibrk, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile</title><title>2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS)</title><addtitle>TELSKS</addtitle><description>H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 "High 422" profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.</description><subject>banding artifacts</subject><subject>Bit rate</subject><subject>bit-depth</subject><subject>contouring</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Fidelity Range Extensions</subject><subject>H.264</subject><subject>High 422 Profile</subject><subject>Internal Bit Depth Increase</subject><subject>PSNR</subject><subject>Transform coding</subject><subject>Video coding</subject><isbn>9781479908998</isbn><isbn>1479908991</isbn><isbn>1479909009</isbn><isbn>9781479909025</isbn><isbn>1479909025</isbn><isbn>9781479909001</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AYhFdEUGt-QS_7A0x89yN5d49SqhEDHlovXkqyH7jSNGE3Cv57Y9vTzMPAwAwhSwYFY6Aftutm87opODBRVAhSg7wgt0yi1qAB9CXJNKoTK63VNclS-gIAhlgKWd2Qj9XQj20MaTjQwVMzU3QphRlHF_0Q-_Zg3H_EIO_CRH9SQdXRWTdOn_f0-2BdpHXBK0nrIDmnYxx82Ls7cuXbfXLZWRfk_Wm9XdV58_b8snps8sCwnHLVAVrkFkGZeYHhFXAQ1knVluiRC-4rYTTa1nNEXXpTdry0gjmmpJFCLMjy1Bucc7sxhr6Nv7vzHeIPK35ROg</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Ruiz, Damian</creator><creator>Sladojevic, Srdjan</creator><creator>Culibrk, Dubravko</creator><creator>Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile</title><author>Ruiz, Damian ; Sladojevic, Srdjan ; Culibrk, Dubravko ; Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8b07d72d708c049c260203de48a57f7232f63c97daf27795fc5b25d31e184c433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>banding artifacts</topic><topic>Bit rate</topic><topic>bit-depth</topic><topic>contouring</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Fidelity Range Extensions</topic><topic>H.264</topic><topic>High 422 Profile</topic><topic>Internal Bit Depth Increase</topic><topic>PSNR</topic><topic>Transform coding</topic><topic>Video coding</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sladojevic, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culibrk, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruiz, Damian</au><au>Sladojevic, Srdjan</au><au>Culibrk, Dubravko</au><au>Fernandez-Escribano, Gerardo</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile</atitle><btitle>2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS)</btitle><stitle>TELSKS</stitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>119</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>119-122</pages><isbn>9781479908998</isbn><isbn>1479908991</isbn><eisbn>1479909009</eisbn><eisbn>9781479909025</eisbn><eisbn>1479909025</eisbn><eisbn>9781479909001</eisbn><abstract>H.264 is one of the first video coding standard incorporating coding formats with a bit-depth of above 8 bits. This paper presents the results of compression comparison tests for the H.264 "High 422" profile, between 10-bit and 8-bit sample depths. The simulations were run on five 720p and 1080i high definition sequences. PSNR and SSIM metrics were used to evaluate the objective quality performance of both bit-depths, and with the aim of enabling a fair comparison, both metrics were computed with 10-bit precision, up-scaling the 8-bit decoded sequences to 10-bits. Some works have been published in this field based on the evaluation of commercial 10-bit H.264 implementations. In this work, we carry out a neutral evaluation of H.264 standard performance using the official H.264 Reference Software. Unlike the expected 10-bit coding gains, the results show unnoticeable differences between both sample depths in terms of objective quality, lower 0.1dB for PSNR and 0.002 for SSIM, with a 5% bit rate saving that can be achieved for the luminance component, especially for the 720p format, and negligible quality improvement for U and V chroma components.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9781479908998
ispartof 2013 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013, Vol.1, p.119-122
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6704904
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects banding artifacts
Bit rate
bit-depth
contouring
Encoding
Fidelity Range Extensions
H.264
High 422 Profile
Internal Bit Depth Increase
PSNR
Transform coding
Video coding
title Comparison of compression performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit depth, under H.264 Hi422 profile
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20compression%20performance%20of%2010-bit%20vs.%208-bit%20depth,%20under%20H.264%20Hi422%20profile&rft.btitle=2013%2011th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Telecommunications%20in%20Modern%20Satellite,%20Cable%20and%20Broadcasting%20Services%20(TELSIKS)&rft.au=Ruiz,%20Damian&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=119-122&rft.isbn=9781479908998&rft.isbn_list=1479908991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TELSKS.2013.6704904&rft.eisbn=1479909009&rft.eisbn_list=9781479909025&rft.eisbn_list=1479909025&rft.eisbn_list=9781479909001&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6704904%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-8b07d72d708c049c260203de48a57f7232f63c97daf27795fc5b25d31e184c433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6704904&rfr_iscdi=true