Loading…

A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization

A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506
Main Authors: Quoc Duy Vo, De, Pradipta
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3
container_end_page 506
container_issue 1
container_start_page 491
container_title IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials
container_volume 18
creator Quoc Duy Vo
De, Pradipta
description A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_7131436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7131436</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1835574175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8LXrxszeRz91iLVaHSQyv0FtJsIlu2m5rsCvXXm1rx4GlgeN5h3geha8AjAFzeT-avi-WIYOAjwlghKDlBA0IlzSXjq1M0AM5pXki5OkcXMW4wZoSVeIDIOFv04dPuM--yad2-27ALddvlDzraKpv3XeV9yGbe6Kb-0l3t20t05nQT7dXvHKK36eNy8pzP5k8vk_EsN5QUXV6CAWvcWhJdaTAcRAHAKXFOaMtxWRUi7TQtsas4XxPQnK1BY0ucdtwYOkR3x7u74D96Gzu1raOxTaNb6_uooKCcSwaSJ_T2H7rxfWjTdwqkAIHL1DdR5EiZ4GMM1qlUdavDXgFWB43qR6M6aFS_GlPo5hiqrbV_AQkUGBX0GwKfbUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761609042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</creator><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><description>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-877X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-745X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Content Based Image Retrieval ; Database Search ; Devices ; Energy Efficiency ; Feature extraction ; Fingerprint recognition ; Fingerprinting ; Localization ; Mobile communication systems ; Mobile handsets ; Outdoor ; Outdoor Positioning ; Pattern Matching ; Position (location) ; Searching ; Sensors ; Signal based Positioning ; Signatures ; Smartphone Sensing ; Tutorials ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials, 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7131436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><title>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</title><addtitle>COMST</addtitle><description>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Content Based Image Retrieval</subject><subject>Database Search</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy Efficiency</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Fingerprint recognition</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Mobile handsets</subject><subject>Outdoor</subject><subject>Outdoor Positioning</subject><subject>Pattern Matching</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal based Positioning</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Smartphone Sensing</subject><subject>Tutorials</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1553-877X</issn><issn>2373-745X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8LXrxszeRz91iLVaHSQyv0FtJsIlu2m5rsCvXXm1rx4GlgeN5h3geha8AjAFzeT-avi-WIYOAjwlghKDlBA0IlzSXjq1M0AM5pXki5OkcXMW4wZoSVeIDIOFv04dPuM--yad2-27ALddvlDzraKpv3XeV9yGbe6Kb-0l3t20t05nQT7dXvHKK36eNy8pzP5k8vk_EsN5QUXV6CAWvcWhJdaTAcRAHAKXFOaMtxWRUi7TQtsas4XxPQnK1BY0ucdtwYOkR3x7u74D96Gzu1raOxTaNb6_uooKCcSwaSJ_T2H7rxfWjTdwqkAIHL1DdR5EiZ4GMM1qlUdavDXgFWB43qR6M6aFS_GlPo5hiqrbV_AQkUGBX0GwKfbUI</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Quoc Duy Vo</creator><creator>De, Pradipta</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><author>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Content Based Image Retrieval</topic><topic>Database Search</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy Efficiency</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Fingerprint recognition</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Mobile handsets</topic><topic>Outdoor</topic><topic>Outdoor Positioning</topic><topic>Pattern Matching</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal based Positioning</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Smartphone Sensing</topic><topic>Tutorials</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quoc Duy Vo</au><au>De, Pradipta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</atitle><jtitle>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</jtitle><stitle>COMST</stitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>491-506</pages><issn>1553-877X</issn><eissn>2373-745X</eissn><abstract>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-877X
ispartof IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials, 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506
issn 1553-877X
2373-745X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_7131436
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Accuracy
Content Based Image Retrieval
Database Search
Devices
Energy Efficiency
Feature extraction
Fingerprint recognition
Fingerprinting
Localization
Mobile communication systems
Mobile handsets
Outdoor
Outdoor Positioning
Pattern Matching
Position (location)
Searching
Sensors
Signal based Positioning
Signatures
Smartphone Sensing
Tutorials
Visualization
title A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20of%20Fingerprint-Based%20Outdoor%20Localization&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20Communications%20surveys%20and%20tutorials&rft.au=Quoc%20Duy%20Vo&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=491-506&rft.issn=1553-877X&rft.eissn=2373-745X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E1835574175%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761609042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7131436&rfr_iscdi=true