Loading…
A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization
A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accura...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3 |
container_end_page | 506 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 491 |
container_title | IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Quoc Duy Vo De, Pradipta |
description | A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_7131436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7131436</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1835574175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8LXrxszeRz91iLVaHSQyv0FtJsIlu2m5rsCvXXm1rx4GlgeN5h3geha8AjAFzeT-avi-WIYOAjwlghKDlBA0IlzSXjq1M0AM5pXki5OkcXMW4wZoSVeIDIOFv04dPuM--yad2-27ALddvlDzraKpv3XeV9yGbe6Kb-0l3t20t05nQT7dXvHKK36eNy8pzP5k8vk_EsN5QUXV6CAWvcWhJdaTAcRAHAKXFOaMtxWRUi7TQtsas4XxPQnK1BY0ucdtwYOkR3x7u74D96Gzu1raOxTaNb6_uooKCcSwaSJ_T2H7rxfWjTdwqkAIHL1DdR5EiZ4GMM1qlUdavDXgFWB43qR6M6aFS_GlPo5hiqrbV_AQkUGBX0GwKfbUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761609042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</creator><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><description>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-877X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-745X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Content Based Image Retrieval ; Database Search ; Devices ; Energy Efficiency ; Feature extraction ; Fingerprint recognition ; Fingerprinting ; Localization ; Mobile communication systems ; Mobile handsets ; Outdoor ; Outdoor Positioning ; Pattern Matching ; Position (location) ; Searching ; Sensors ; Signal based Positioning ; Signatures ; Smartphone Sensing ; Tutorials ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials, 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7131436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><title>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</title><addtitle>COMST</addtitle><description>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Content Based Image Retrieval</subject><subject>Database Search</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy Efficiency</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Fingerprint recognition</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Mobile communication systems</subject><subject>Mobile handsets</subject><subject>Outdoor</subject><subject>Outdoor Positioning</subject><subject>Pattern Matching</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal based Positioning</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Smartphone Sensing</subject><subject>Tutorials</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1553-877X</issn><issn>2373-745X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QC8LXrxszeRz91iLVaHSQyv0FtJsIlu2m5rsCvXXm1rx4GlgeN5h3geha8AjAFzeT-avi-WIYOAjwlghKDlBA0IlzSXjq1M0AM5pXki5OkcXMW4wZoSVeIDIOFv04dPuM--yad2-27ALddvlDzraKpv3XeV9yGbe6Kb-0l3t20t05nQT7dXvHKK36eNy8pzP5k8vk_EsN5QUXV6CAWvcWhJdaTAcRAHAKXFOaMtxWRUi7TQtsas4XxPQnK1BY0ucdtwYOkR3x7u74D96Gzu1raOxTaNb6_uooKCcSwaSJ_T2H7rxfWjTdwqkAIHL1DdR5EiZ4GMM1qlUdavDXgFWB43qR6M6aFS_GlPo5hiqrbV_AQkUGBX0GwKfbUI</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Quoc Duy Vo</creator><creator>De, Pradipta</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</title><author>Quoc Duy Vo ; De, Pradipta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Content Based Image Retrieval</topic><topic>Database Search</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy Efficiency</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Fingerprint recognition</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Mobile communication systems</topic><topic>Mobile handsets</topic><topic>Outdoor</topic><topic>Outdoor Positioning</topic><topic>Pattern Matching</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal based Positioning</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Smartphone Sensing</topic><topic>Tutorials</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quoc Duy Vo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Pradipta</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quoc Duy Vo</au><au>De, Pradipta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization</atitle><jtitle>IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials</jtitle><stitle>COMST</stitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>491-506</pages><issn>1553-877X</issn><eissn>2373-745X</eissn><abstract>A growing number of sensors on smart mobile devices has led to rapid development of various mobile applications using location-based or context-aware services. Typically, outdoor localization techniques have relied on GPS or on cellular infrastructure support. While GPS gives high positioning accuracy, it can quickly deplete the battery on the device. On the other hand, base station based localization has low accuracy. In search of alternative techniques for outdoor localization, several approaches have explored the use of data gathered from other available sensors, like accelerometer, microphone, compass, and even daily patterns of usage, to identify unique signatures that can locate a device. Signatures, or fingerprints of an area, are hidden cues existing around a user's environment. However, under different operating scenarios, fingerprint-based localization techniques have variable performance in terms of accuracy, latency of detection, battery usage. The main contribution of this survey is to present a classification of existing fingerprint-based localization approaches which intelligently sense and match different clues from the environment for location identification. We describe how each fingerprinting technique works, followed by a review of the merits and demerits of the systems built based on these techniques. We conclude by identifying several improvements and application domain for fingerprinting based localization.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-877X |
ispartof | IEEE Communications surveys and tutorials, 2016, Vol.18 (1), p.491-506 |
issn | 1553-877X 2373-745X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_7131436 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Content Based Image Retrieval Database Search Devices Energy Efficiency Feature extraction Fingerprint recognition Fingerprinting Localization Mobile communication systems Mobile handsets Outdoor Outdoor Positioning Pattern Matching Position (location) Searching Sensors Signal based Positioning Signatures Smartphone Sensing Tutorials Visualization |
title | A Survey of Fingerprint-Based Outdoor Localization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20of%20Fingerprint-Based%20Outdoor%20Localization&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20Communications%20surveys%20and%20tutorials&rft.au=Quoc%20Duy%20Vo&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=491-506&rft.issn=1553-877X&rft.eissn=2373-745X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/COMST.2015.2448632&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E1835574175%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-91c1ecfb72ada1c516811532ff6ae509d86516a390fd55b21a54b1a0e2faf5cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761609042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7131436&rfr_iscdi=true |