Update to who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996-2013)

• Main Authors: Boettger, Ryan K., Friess, Erin, Carliner, Saul
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academe-industry relationships; content analysis; Education; Industries; Organizations; peer-reviewed literature; professional literature; Publishing; Rhetoric
• ISSN: 2158-091X
• DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235812

Academe-industry relations are an ongoing topic in the conversation on technical communication. Key issues in the conversation include alignment between academic curricula and industry needs, the effectiveness of the preparation provided by academic programs, and the alignment of interests between the two groups. However, no study has attempted to empirically assess the extent of the academic and industry alignment empirically. This paper provides updated results from our ongoing exploration of this issue. It is guided by the following questions: (1) What content areas are covered by both peer-reviewed and trade publications?, (2) What content areas are unique to each type of publication?, and (3) Who is the intended audience of the content? To assess this alignment, we coded for three major content areas in a random sample of 986 articles published between 1996 and 2013 in four leading peer-reviewed journals (IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Technical Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly) and one publication for practicing technical communicators (Intercom).