Loading…
Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme
SoftCast-based linear video coding and transmission (LVCT) schemes have been proposed as a promising alternative to traditional video coding and transmission schemes in wireless environments. Currently, the performance of LVCT schemes is evaluated by means of traditional objective scores such as PSN...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 99 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Trioux, Anthony Valenzise, Giuseppe Cagnazzo, Marco Kieffer, Michel Coudoux, Francois-Xavier Corlay, Patrick Gharbi, Mohamed |
description | SoftCast-based linear video coding and transmission (LVCT) schemes have been proposed as a promising alternative to traditional video coding and transmission schemes in wireless environments. Currently, the performance of LVCT schemes is evaluated by means of traditional objective scores such as PSNR or SSIM. Nevertheless, since the compression is performed in a very different way from traditional coding schemes such as HEVC, visual artifacts are also quite different and deserve to be subjectively assessed. In this paper, we propose a subjective quality assessment of SoftCast, pioneer and standard of the LVCT schemes. This study aims to better understand the trade-offs between the LVCT parameters that can be tuned to improve the quality. These parameters, including different GoP-sizes, Compression Ratios (CR) and Channel Signal-to-Noise Ratio (CSNR), are used to generate a dataset of 85 videos. A Double Stimulus Impairment Scale (DSIS) test is performed on the received videos to assess the perceived quality. Results show that the key characteristic of SoftCast, the linear relation between CSNR and PSNR, is also observed with the Mean-Opinion Scores (MOS), except at high CSNR where the quality saturates. In addition, Bjøntegaard model is used to quantify the trade-offs between CR, GoP-size and CSNR, depending on the intended application. Finally, the performance of objective metrics compared to the obtained MOS is evaluated. Results show that Multi-Scale SSIM (MS-SSIM), SSIM and Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) metrics offer the best correlation with the MOS values. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/VCIP49819.2020.9301778 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_CHZPO</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9301778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9301778</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>9301778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h285t-b6ae6c765ba6f57f0934191fe80fdb55139472a5935b86fd9bde38a380c5acd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtqAjEYRtNCodb6BIWSFxiby-S2lKEXQbBl1K0kkz9MxJkpk1jw7StUuvo4m8PhQ-iZkjmlxLzsquVnaTQ1c0YYmRtOqFL6Bj1QxTTVRGp5iyZMlqwwXKh7NEvpQAhhgnJm9ARt65M7QJPjD2Dbe7z-p6-TPcZ8xouUIKUO-oyHgHMLuB5CrmzKeBc9DHgz2j51MaU49LhuWujgEd0Fe0wwu-4Ubd9eN9VHsVq_L6vFqmiZFrlw0oJslBTOyiBUIIaX1NAAmgTvxKXRlIpZcUl3WgZvnAeuLdekEbbxkk_R0583AsD-e4ydHc_76wv8F6ljUrM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme</title><source>IEEE Xplore All Conference Series</source><creator>Trioux, Anthony ; Valenzise, Giuseppe ; Cagnazzo, Marco ; Kieffer, Michel ; Coudoux, Francois-Xavier ; Corlay, Patrick ; Gharbi, Mohamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Trioux, Anthony ; Valenzise, Giuseppe ; Cagnazzo, Marco ; Kieffer, Michel ; Coudoux, Francois-Xavier ; Corlay, Patrick ; Gharbi, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><description>SoftCast-based linear video coding and transmission (LVCT) schemes have been proposed as a promising alternative to traditional video coding and transmission schemes in wireless environments. Currently, the performance of LVCT schemes is evaluated by means of traditional objective scores such as PSNR or SSIM. Nevertheless, since the compression is performed in a very different way from traditional coding schemes such as HEVC, visual artifacts are also quite different and deserve to be subjectively assessed. In this paper, we propose a subjective quality assessment of SoftCast, pioneer and standard of the LVCT schemes. This study aims to better understand the trade-offs between the LVCT parameters that can be tuned to improve the quality. These parameters, including different GoP-sizes, Compression Ratios (CR) and Channel Signal-to-Noise Ratio (CSNR), are used to generate a dataset of 85 videos. A Double Stimulus Impairment Scale (DSIS) test is performed on the received videos to assess the perceived quality. Results show that the key characteristic of SoftCast, the linear relation between CSNR and PSNR, is also observed with the Mean-Opinion Scores (MOS), except at high CSNR where the quality saturates. In addition, Bjøntegaard model is used to quantify the trade-offs between CR, GoP-size and CSNR, depending on the intended application. Finally, the performance of objective metrics compared to the obtained MOS is evaluated. Results show that Multi-Scale SSIM (MS-SSIM), SSIM and Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) metrics offer the best correlation with the MOS values.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2642-9357</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1728180686</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781728180687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/VCIP49819.2020.9301778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Joint Source-Channel Coding ; Linear Video Coding ; Metadata ; Observers ; Quality assessment ; Snow ; SoftCast ; Subjective Quality Assessment ; Transforms ; Transmitters ; Visual Artifacts ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2020, p.96-99</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9301778$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27925,54555,54932</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9301778$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trioux, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenzise, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieffer, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudoux, Francois-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corlay, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharbi, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><title>Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme</title><title>2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)</title><addtitle>VCIP</addtitle><description>SoftCast-based linear video coding and transmission (LVCT) schemes have been proposed as a promising alternative to traditional video coding and transmission schemes in wireless environments. Currently, the performance of LVCT schemes is evaluated by means of traditional objective scores such as PSNR or SSIM. Nevertheless, since the compression is performed in a very different way from traditional coding schemes such as HEVC, visual artifacts are also quite different and deserve to be subjectively assessed. In this paper, we propose a subjective quality assessment of SoftCast, pioneer and standard of the LVCT schemes. This study aims to better understand the trade-offs between the LVCT parameters that can be tuned to improve the quality. These parameters, including different GoP-sizes, Compression Ratios (CR) and Channel Signal-to-Noise Ratio (CSNR), are used to generate a dataset of 85 videos. A Double Stimulus Impairment Scale (DSIS) test is performed on the received videos to assess the perceived quality. Results show that the key characteristic of SoftCast, the linear relation between CSNR and PSNR, is also observed with the Mean-Opinion Scores (MOS), except at high CSNR where the quality saturates. In addition, Bjøntegaard model is used to quantify the trade-offs between CR, GoP-size and CSNR, depending on the intended application. Finally, the performance of objective metrics compared to the obtained MOS is evaluated. Results show that Multi-Scale SSIM (MS-SSIM), SSIM and Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) metrics offer the best correlation with the MOS values.</description><subject>Joint Source-Channel Coding</subject><subject>Linear Video Coding</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>SoftCast</subject><subject>Subjective Quality Assessment</subject><subject>Transforms</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>Visual Artifacts</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>2642-9357</issn><isbn>1728180686</isbn><isbn>9781728180687</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtqAjEYRtNCodb6BIWSFxiby-S2lKEXQbBl1K0kkz9MxJkpk1jw7StUuvo4m8PhQ-iZkjmlxLzsquVnaTQ1c0YYmRtOqFL6Bj1QxTTVRGp5iyZMlqwwXKh7NEvpQAhhgnJm9ARt65M7QJPjD2Dbe7z-p6-TPcZ8xouUIKUO-oyHgHMLuB5CrmzKeBc9DHgz2j51MaU49LhuWujgEd0Fe0wwu-4Ubd9eN9VHsVq_L6vFqmiZFrlw0oJslBTOyiBUIIaX1NAAmgTvxKXRlIpZcUl3WgZvnAeuLdekEbbxkk_R0583AsD-e4ydHc_76wv8F6ljUrM</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Trioux, Anthony</creator><creator>Valenzise, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Cagnazzo, Marco</creator><creator>Kieffer, Michel</creator><creator>Coudoux, Francois-Xavier</creator><creator>Corlay, Patrick</creator><creator>Gharbi, Mohamed</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme</title><author>Trioux, Anthony ; Valenzise, Giuseppe ; Cagnazzo, Marco ; Kieffer, Michel ; Coudoux, Francois-Xavier ; Corlay, Patrick ; Gharbi, Mohamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h285t-b6ae6c765ba6f57f0934191fe80fdb55139472a5935b86fd9bde38a380c5acd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Joint Source-Channel Coding</topic><topic>Linear Video Coding</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>SoftCast</topic><topic>Subjective Quality Assessment</topic><topic>Transforms</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>Visual Artifacts</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trioux, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenzise, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnazzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieffer, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coudoux, Francois-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corlay, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharbi, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trioux, Anthony</au><au>Valenzise, Giuseppe</au><au>Cagnazzo, Marco</au><au>Kieffer, Michel</au><au>Coudoux, Francois-Xavier</au><au>Corlay, Patrick</au><au>Gharbi, Mohamed</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme</atitle><btitle>2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP)</btitle><stitle>VCIP</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><spage>96</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>96-99</pages><eissn>2642-9357</eissn><eisbn>1728180686</eisbn><eisbn>9781728180687</eisbn><abstract>SoftCast-based linear video coding and transmission (LVCT) schemes have been proposed as a promising alternative to traditional video coding and transmission schemes in wireless environments. Currently, the performance of LVCT schemes is evaluated by means of traditional objective scores such as PSNR or SSIM. Nevertheless, since the compression is performed in a very different way from traditional coding schemes such as HEVC, visual artifacts are also quite different and deserve to be subjectively assessed. In this paper, we propose a subjective quality assessment of SoftCast, pioneer and standard of the LVCT schemes. This study aims to better understand the trade-offs between the LVCT parameters that can be tuned to improve the quality. These parameters, including different GoP-sizes, Compression Ratios (CR) and Channel Signal-to-Noise Ratio (CSNR), are used to generate a dataset of 85 videos. A Double Stimulus Impairment Scale (DSIS) test is performed on the received videos to assess the perceived quality. Results show that the key characteristic of SoftCast, the linear relation between CSNR and PSNR, is also observed with the Mean-Opinion Scores (MOS), except at high CSNR where the quality saturates. In addition, Bjøntegaard model is used to quantify the trade-offs between CR, GoP-size and CSNR, depending on the intended application. Finally, the performance of objective metrics compared to the obtained MOS is evaluated. Results show that Multi-Scale SSIM (MS-SSIM), SSIM and Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) metrics offer the best correlation with the MOS values.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/VCIP49819.2020.9301778</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | EISSN: 2642-9357 |
ispartof | 2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2020, p.96-99 |
issn | 2642-9357 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_9301778 |
source | IEEE Xplore All Conference Series |
subjects | Joint Source-Channel Coding Linear Video Coding Metadata Observers Quality assessment Snow SoftCast Subjective Quality Assessment Transforms Transmitters Visual Artifacts Visualization |
title | Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of the SoftCast Video Transmission Scheme |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_CHZPO&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Subjective%20and%20Objective%20Quality%20Assessment%20of%20the%20SoftCast%20Video%20Transmission%20Scheme&rft.btitle=2020%20IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Visual%20Communications%20and%20Image%20Processing%20(VCIP)&rft.au=Trioux,%20Anthony&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=96-99&rft.eissn=2642-9357&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/VCIP49819.2020.9301778&rft.eisbn=1728180686&rft.eisbn_list=9781728180687&rft_dat=%3Cieee_CHZPO%3E9301778%3C/ieee_CHZPO%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h285t-b6ae6c765ba6f57f0934191fe80fdb55139472a5935b86fd9bde38a380c5acd63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9301778&rfr_iscdi=true |